Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
2008-05-17, 01:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
So. I noticed this while screwing around with dread necro the other day. (as my previous post might have implied, thanks to all that replied on that one btw.)
The following quote was taken from realms help
As long as you have a necromancy spell of 3rd level or higher available to cast, any living creature you hit with a melee touch attack becomes sickened for a number of rounds equal to the level of the highest-level necromancy spell you have available to cast. The subject can reduce this duration to 1 round with a successful Fortitude save
Since I don't have ready access to complete mage, I'm not sure if it's an accurate description of the ability or not. As it reads right now, This ability functions every time you make a melee touch attack against a living foe, regardless of what sort of touch attack it is. Trip attempt? sickenend. melee touch spell? sickened. I'm not sure that's what wizards had in mind when they wrote this ability up. I sort of hope not.
So, those in the know, (or have Cmage handy) Is this an accurate representation of the original wording? has there been some errata added somewhere to clarify this? Am I just blowing smoke out of my rear?
-
2008-05-17, 01:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Ireland
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
Is that from a feat or a class ability?
EDIT: realised after posting that it was a feat, my bad.Last edited by Jimp; 2008-05-17 at 01:52 PM.
Dub Club in the Playground
I need a new signature.
-
2008-05-17, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington State
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
I believe they meant for it to be an action that you take independently, like, "I use my sickening grasp on the paladin," not, "I hit with my inflict serious wounds spell on the paladin, is he sickened now, teehee?"
-
2008-05-17, 02:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
Take a look at the sickened condition. Sickened. The sickened condition isn't terribly debilitating. You have to make a melee touch attack, which means getting next to them. They get a fort save to reduce the duration to one round. Overall I wouldn't put it at overpowered, but if you're in a group that doesn't optimize much it may seem that way.
-
2008-05-17, 02:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
I believe they meant for it to be an action that you take independently, like, "I use my sickening grasp on the paladin," not, "I hit with my inflict serious wounds spell on the paladin, is he sickened now, teehee?"
Take a look at the sickened condition. Sickened. The sickened condition isn't terribly debilitating. You have to make a melee touch attack, which means getting next to them. They get a fort save to reduce the duration to one round. Overall I wouldn't put it at overpowered, but if you're in a group that doesn't optimize much it may seem that way.
-
2008-05-17, 02:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Ireland
-
2008-05-17, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Orlando, FL
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
That's actually the full description straight out of CMage.
-
2008-05-17, 03:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Montréal
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
Actually, as a Reserve feat, it's an SLA, so you have to actually use the standard action for it.
-
2008-05-18, 01:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
more stuff taken from realms help.
Each reserve feat's primary benefit is a supernatural ability usable at will. Unless stated otherwise, it requires a standard action to activate and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.
Now. it is very easily be argued that the quote below does actual state otherwise. It specifically states that any creature you hit with an MTA is sickened, not that you may use an MTA to sicken a creature. If it were worded in the latter fashion, there could be no dispute.
any living creature you hit with a melee touch attack becomes sickened for a number of rounds equal to the level of the highest-level necromancy spell you have available to cast.
As long as you have a sonic spell of 3rd level or higher available to cast, you can deliver a melee touch attack as a standard action.
As long as you have an abjuration spell of 5th level or higher available to cast, you can make another creature's spellcasting harmful to itself. Use of this feat requires a melee touch attack that does not provoke attacks of opportunity. As a standard action, with a successful touch you can infuse another creature with baneful magic for a number of rounds equal to the level of the highest-level abjuration spell you have available. A successful Will save reduces this duration to 1 round.
-
2008-05-18, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- IPR Violation
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
For it to be stated otherwise they would have to specify what action would be required if not a standard action.
The other reserve feats delivered via MTA are very carefully worded to indicate exactly how they are executed. Why is Sickening Grasp an exception?
However, hopefully this thread, with your quote, has now helped inform others that if no other action is listed it requires a standard action.
-
2008-05-18, 01:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: today's stupid question: Sickening Grasp? broken or not
Who'd take a feat that lets you sicken creatures with a touch, anyway? Abolish bathing for a year and go on a strict diet of old cheese and garlic and you achieve the same result.