Results 1 to 30 of 37
Thread: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
-
2008-07-22, 03:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- NYC
[4e] Stunlocking Fix?
I've noticed that it's been suggested that the best tactic for dealing with most Elites and especially Solos is to stunlock them and kill them without them being able to do anything back to you.
Here is a suggested fix for that eventuality: Remove Stunned as a condition and replace it with something else (in other words, just change what being Stunned means).
One simple solution is to take two of the other conditions and combine them; Dazed + Prone might work pretty well.
Any other suggestions or comments?Last edited by JaxGaret; 2008-07-22 at 03:54 AM.
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
2008-07-22, 04:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
That would devalue Stunning powers.
You could give solos a bonus to saving throws, or make them dazed with penalties instead of stunned. Elites are fine, I think.
-
2008-07-22, 06:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- The sunny South
- Gender
-
2008-07-22, 06:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
-
2008-07-22, 08:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
-
2008-07-22, 08:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- NYC
-
2008-07-22, 08:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- NYC
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
You are correct, of course.
Originally Posted by RL
Another one that I just thought of this morning is to make the Stunned condition the only condition one saves against at the beginning of their turn, instead of at the end; this would also devalue Stunning in general, however.You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
2008-07-22, 10:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Stunlock is only a problem when you have lvl 30 demigods. Stunning is fine. It's Divine Miracle which needs to be fixed.
Avatar by Aedilred
GitP Blood Bowl Manager Cup Record
Styx Rivermen, Feets Reloaded, and Selene's Seductive Strut
Record: 42-17-13
3-time Division Champ, Cup Champion
-
2008-07-22, 11:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
And heaven forbid that a level 30 character actually be able to do something amazing!
Man, during the forum outage, I started reading the WotC forums... what a bunch of wackos! It seems like nobody builds a character at less than level 30, and crows about how a single, once-per-day combo (only available at level 30) somehow breaks the game.
JeezLead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 11:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Stop. Just Stop. The "It's Ok because it's level 30 argument is BS and you know it. Divine Miracle, which has no upper limit (*the root of the problem), blows away every other lvl 30 power. Just because it's level 30 doesn't mean it's not Broken.
I'm sure you were fine with Celerity+timestop+dimlock+forcecage+cloudkill because "a character that level should be able to do something amazing".
Seriously, don't even bother.
Edit: Added in Dimensional Lock...I had forgotten it.Last edited by Crow; 2008-07-22 at 02:56 PM.
Avatar by Aedilred
GitP Blood Bowl Manager Cup Record
Styx Rivermen, Feets Reloaded, and Selene's Seductive Strut
Record: 42-17-13
3-time Division Champ, Cup Champion
-
2008-07-22, 11:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
/thread-derail
Ok, hilarious and I'm sure it'll irk alot of people off but, I was positive he was talking about World of Warcraft until he started talking about Dazed and Prone, almost all of the terms before that being completely interchangable between the two games.
You may now resume your regularly scheduled discussion.
-
2008-07-22, 11:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
It's a broken combo, yes. It's also a minor issue. Celerity/timestop/forcecage/cloudkill was similarly a minor issue. (Most of the stuff you fought at that level was too big to fit in the forcecage, able to teleport out, or just plain immune to poison. Wizards were broken in 3.X not because of that combo but because they could use spells to bypass everything that normal characters had to struggle through, including monster hit points.)
-
2008-07-22, 11:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 12:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
It's a "minor" issue in that it won't come up that often, but by this reasoning 9th-level spells were a minor issue.
It stops being a minor issue for anyone who actually intends to play at level 30, because it makes demigods (a) disproportionately powerful and (b) so vastly better a choice than the other Epic Destinies everyone who remotely cares about that will pick it.
-
2008-07-22, 12:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
That's true... but do many people just roll up level 30 characters all the time? I mean, I've never done it, and it seems kind of silly to ignore the other 29/30ths of the game.
Also, this is actually less of an issue than 9th level spells since 9th level spells were around for at least 4 levels and could be accessed earlier through scrolls. Here, it is literally a problem for the last level supported in the game.
And, as has been noted in the WotC forums, Demigod is actually sub-par for levels 20-29 compared to the other epic destinies. Or at least on par.
Making mountains out of molehills is how I see it, but maybe other people just play much differently than I?Last edited by Oracle_Hunter; 2008-07-22 at 12:08 PM.
Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 12:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
It's a clear balance issue. It's not important until level 30, but at level 30 it's overwhelmingly important because it fundamentally changes how the game plays.
I don't see how squabbling over just how minor or major a deal that is will help. I'm not sure why you'd object to someone fixing it just because it doesn't come up for you.
-
2008-07-22, 12:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Oh, I'm not objecting to them fixing it, but I am objecting to the sound and fury that it engenders.
Stunlocks, Orb Wizards, Seal of Binding + Divine Regeneration... heck, at least Blade Cascade showed up at level 15. There wasn't this much angst over Diplomancy in 3e, and that was a problem from level 2!Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
I'll look up the specific issues here, but I noted someone saying there was a problem with an infinite loop.
Whatever it is, and again I'll look it up later, just put a cap on it. A la Blade Cascade.Gnoll Paladin with Zanbatou Avatar by Oregano.
Homebrews:
Originally Posted by ExHunterEmerald
-
2008-07-22, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
-
2008-07-22, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
I agree that there is a problem, especially considering that this exploit targets solos and elites, which means it's very likely to be useful in the climactic battle of the campaign. And I have no objections to somebody fixing it. But I think it's silly to implement the fix by changing fundamental rules of the game (solo and elite saving throws, the nature of stun, and so forth) to address a problem created by one single power.
In 3.X, candles of invocation were broken as hell, because they let you summon CR 20+ monsters at a relatively low level. To fix this, would you rewrite every high-level monster so that it would be balanced when summoned by the candle? Or would you just ban the freakin' candle?
Divine Miracle is the problem here, so fix Divine Miracle. It might be as simple as saying you're not allowed to regain the same encounter power twice in a row.Last edited by Dausuul; 2008-07-22 at 12:20 PM.
-
2008-07-22, 12:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Divine Miracle is one problem; the effectiveness of stunning against solos is another. A wizard with an orb of inevitable continuance and his own Orb can throw out at least two 2-round stuns in a row every encounter. Add in a Warlock, more stuff for the wizard, one of the other party members, and we're talking about, what, potentially 8 rounds? That's a long time for solo monsters not to do anything. Of course, boosting saves vs. stun wouldn't help, here.
Also, letting people switch back and forth between two potent encounter powers wouldn't make Divine Miracle that much more tolerable.
-
2008-07-22, 12:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- A Tavern, DUH!
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Yes, I also find it kind of odd that people seem to be fretting so much over a power you will see for maybe 3.33 % of your adventurer careeer if even that, unless you are running a level 30 campain or something.
Also, would a fair enough fix be to just only allow power recharge, with a recharge roll? Like monsters? Ok, so it'd be like "Oh noes, I'm all out of E powers, now I need to roll a 4-6 to get one back." Or maybe just make the power recieved random. Thus you can avoid things like stun AoE's being used every round.
-
2008-07-22, 12:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
But will they hit? That's the key question. Solos tend to have fairly solid defenses, especially solos that are higher-level than the party. (Also, the orb of inevitable continuance is only usable once per day, not once per encounter.)
Fair enough. Then perhaps Myatar's solution of randomizing the power you get back is a better fix.Last edited by Dausuul; 2008-07-22 at 12:38 PM.
-
2008-07-22, 12:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Enterprise, Alabama
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
-
2008-07-22, 12:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
This runs into the infinite rerolls problem. I'd say, as a houserule, to invoke the 40K rule of "no rerolls for rerolls" and be done with it. It certainly doesn't make having tons of rerolls less good, but it limits the probability of doing ridiculous things like the original Orcusslayer and the new Infinite Damage Build.
Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 12:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- The Rhine
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
In epic, you can use three different Orbs of Inevitable Continuance over two encounters, if you're not using other items. After the second you get to use them again.
They'll definitely hit if there's a Tactical Warlord in the party (the size of the Tactical Warlord's bonuses compared to the other leaders is a bigger and less simple issue than Divine Miracle), and are fairly likely to hit if a different Leader is particularly cooperative.
Fair enough. Then perhaps Myatar's solution of randomizing the power you get back is a better fix.
-
2008-07-22, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 01:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- A Tavern, DUH!
- Gender
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
But you gain an extra item use after every two encounters, just like with action points. But still, you cannot ever use the daily power a single item possesses more than once per day, unless its an artifact. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you guys are discussing.
Last edited by Myatar_Panwar; 2008-07-22 at 01:00 PM.
-
2008-07-22, 01:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Gender
Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter GamesToday a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!
~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~Spoiler
Elflad
-
2008-07-22, 02:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
Re: [4e] Stunlocking Fix?
Divine Miracle simply recharging all encounter powers when empty would do a good job of preventing stunlock abuse.
You 1 item daily power per milestone on top of the regular amount.