New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ireland

    Default [4e] Possible skill houserule?

    I'm trying to get some of my players here to try a 4th edition game just to see what it's like. One of their complaints is that they don't like the generalised skill system and preferred older ways. As a fix I'm thinking of using 2e Non-Weapon Proficiencies and giving each class their trained skills number + int mod NWP slots. My players like the NWP system and I can't see any real conflicts in rules by using it.
    Does this sound good?
    Dub Club in the Playground
    I need a new signature.

  2. - Top - End - #2

    Default Re: [4e] Possible skill houserule?

    Well, uh, you're going to lose the whole skill challenge mechanic.

    What exactly is gained by using NWPs? What does it add to the game?

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [4e] Possible skill houserule?

    I think he's keeping the same skill challenges. But with this mod players can know a number of outside the box "flavor only" skills equal to their int mod along with the normal amount of skills. I could go for that.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Knaight's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2008

    Default Re: [4e] Possible skill houserule?

    The players are willing to try the rest of the game. Alternately there is a system I've been developing for a while. Works with 3.5 too.

    Basically you totally divorce skills from class. Then you pick whatever skills you want. Count them, then divide that number by 4. That second number is how many points you get per level(double at first level). Points are then spent in the skills, as many as you want per skill. Buying 1 rank costs 1 point, the second rank costs 2, the third rank 3, etc. Multiply that by 5, then add int he attribute modifier. It sounds complicated, but its really simple. So lets say these are the skills:
    Combat:
    Covert:
    Athletic:
    Magic:
    Professional:
    Craft:

    And lets say 2 points per level. At level 1:
    Combat: 2
    Covert:
    Athletic: 1
    Magic:
    Professional:
    Craft:

    At level 30(62 points):
    Combat: 6(21 points)
    Covert: 4(10 points)
    Athletic: 3(6 points)
    Magic: 5(15 points)
    Professional:4(10 points)
    Craft:4(10 points)

    Granted, you would typically have way more skills and points, but its still far fewer to deal with than standard third edition, and easier to deal with. You could also let the players determine what skills they want to take, then use this.
    I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.

    I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that.
    -- ChubbyRain

    Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Oracle_Hunter's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [4e] Possible skill houserule?

    Nah, this is great. It doesn't use up any of their useful skill slots, and are so rarely used that they shouldn't impact any given adventure.

    If you got to sugar-coat the pill, go for it. I'm curious though: do your players find much use for Forestry or Pottery in your campaigns?

    EDIT:
    I meant the OP's system. No need to make things more complicated for a sideshow like NWPs.
    Last edited by Oracle_Hunter; 2008-08-11 at 07:23 PM.
    Lead Designer for Oracle Hunter Games
    Today a Blog, Tomorrow a Business!


    ~ Awesome Avatar by the phantastic Phase ~
    Spoiler
    Show

    Elflad

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •