Results 1 to 25 of 25
Thread: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
-
2008-08-17, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- New Hampshire, USA
- Gender
[3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I love the quarterstaff. I’ve always considered it one of the iconic weapons in the fantasy genre. The simplicity, clean design and availability make it attractive. So cheap to make it’s basically free. Used by commoners, holy men and fighting monks in both Eastern and Western traditions. But my favorite staff welding character would have to be the Monkey King. Chaos incarnate with a staff in his hands.
Sadly I haven’t ever really seen the staff used effectively in a fantasy role-playing game. I would like to change that. Here-in I offer my take on the quarterstaff. It will be presented firstly as a Simple weapon. I shall than build on its usefulness and martial might as both a Martial and Exotic weapon.
As it stands now a quarterstaff has the following 3.5 statistics:
Simple weapon. Quarterstaff: No cost, 1d4/1d4 (Small), 1d6/1d6 (Medium) ×2, No range increment, 4 lb., Bludgeoning damage. It is a double weapon.
My version:
Simple weapon. Quarterstaff: No cost, 1d6 (Small), 1d8 (Medium) ×2, No range increment, 4 lb., Bludgeoning damage. It is a two-handed weapon. It grants a +2 equipment bonus to Balance and Jump skill checks.
Martial weapon. Quarterstaff: No cost, 1d6 (Small), 1d8 (Medium) ×2, No range increment, 4 lb., Bludgeoning damage. It is a two-handed weapon.
In the hands of a character trained in all martial weapons, has the feat Martial Weapon (Quarterstaff) or is a Monk it receives the following changes: The +2 equipment bonus to Balance and Jump skill checks is increased to a +4 bonus. The quarterstaff has reach, so you can strike opponents 10 feet away with it. In addition, unlike most other weapons with reach, it can be used against an adjacent foe.
Exotic weapon. Quarterstaff: No cost, 1d6/1d6 (Small), 1d8/1d8 (Medium) ×2, No range increment, 4 lb., Bludgeoning damage. It is a two-handed weapon.
In the hands of a character with the feat Exotic Weapon (Quarterstaff) or is a Monk it receives the following changes: The +4 equipment bonus to Balance and Jump skill checks is increased to a +6 bonus. The quarterstaff has reach, so you can strike opponents 10 feet away with it. In addition, unlike most other weapons with reach, it can be used against an adjacent foe.
A quarterstaff is a double weapon. You can fight with it as if fighting with two weapons, but if you do; you incur all the normal attack penalties associated with fighting with two weapons, just as if you were using a one-handed weapon and a light weapon. A creature wielding a quarterstaff in one hand can’t use it as a double weapon—only one end of the weapon can be used in any given round.
Under all circumstances the quarterstaff is a special monk weapon. This designation gives a monk wielding a quarterstaff special options.
-
2008-08-17, 01:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Piercing the heavens!
- Gender
-
2008-08-17, 08:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Sunburnt Oz
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Nice, I may just uhh... Liberate, that for my campaign.
-
2008-08-17, 08:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I may utilize this as well.
-
2008-08-17, 09:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Happy Valley
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I like it as well. Just make sure you add the clause that if using it as a double weapon, you don't have reach with it. Something like "if you use the quarterstaff as a double weapon, it is not considered to have reach until the start of your next turn". At least, that makes sense to me. I think that's what happens with the spiked chain, too, if you take that PrC that lets you use it as a double weapon.
This sounds to me like something that could be done to a lot of weapons. It gets different bonuses and uses the more trained you are with it. It'd take a lot of work to hammer out though, and I at least don't have time.Spending most of my time on another forum.
Awesome Daemonhost avatar by Fin.
-
2008-08-17, 09:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- London, England.
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I'm the author of the Alex Verus series of urban fantasy novels. Fated is the first, and the final book in the series, Risen, is out as of December 2021. For updates, check my blog!
-
2008-08-17, 10:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
2nd edition did some marvelous things with a quarterstaff. If you had a quarterstaff specialist with Two-Handed Style, you had a weapon faster than a dagger (Speed Factor 1 as opposed to 2), that hit as hard a short sword.
For bonuses to skills like balance, etc, I would consider the quarterstaff an appropriate tool for adding +2, provided you were trained in the skill.The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2008-08-17, 10:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Take the example of a good oak whacking stick. It takes me, a Boy Scout with no particular talent, about an hour to find a straight healthy young tree, fell it, cut it to size, and trim off the little burrs. And then significant time to dry out. I would want to cap the ends with metal so that it lasts longer, too.
An excellent bo staff takes a lot of time to make, by people with lots more skill than me.
I suggest the following change to the stats of the original post : the martial and exotic versions are masterwork weapons. The stats you've made are all appropriate for the weapon, IMO, but beyond the scope of 3.5 rules. Hooray for homebrew.
I would leave the standard quarterstaff as it is. As a DM, I would occasionally break the darn things because they're just sticks.
-
2008-08-17, 11:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Vancouver WA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
There was also a prestige class put out called the knight of staves from the master of arms series (basically cool prestige classes based on under/suboptimal weapons to make them cool again). It did some of the things your looking for.
Also My DM let me get away with having an "iron shod" staff that updated the damage to 1d8. It cost a bit then... like 30gp but was worth it.
Also Also the Feather staff and Long staff (both count as quarter staves) from the complete adventurer and rogue I think are also cool upgrades.
Also I suggest you look into spells that can be enchanted on staves for true powergaming... Entangling staff and Spikes along with shillelagh (sp?) are a good ways to take that stick you just picked up and start wronging people. (it helps to have a druid in the party).
Also what do you guys think of different stats for the "Monks Spade" basically a quarter staff with crossier or jangly spikey bits to add a bit of weight (and make the all important "ching... ching" sound as you walk). It's still a staff, often used by japenese/chinese monks if my history is correct?)
For reference they had one as a staff in Jade Empire that looked wicked...
Anyway just some random thoughts on staves from someone who did use them to good effect in 3.5.
-
2008-08-17, 11:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
As for not finding rules which handled them well one of the Fudge weapon chapters has it as one of the better weapons. High damage, parry bonus, reach, speed. If I remember correctly. That and theres the sheer versatility of it. Oh and I would change it to something like this by default.
Quarterstaff 1d6/1d6 or 1d8, reach(can hit adjacent enemies)
Quarterstaff Mastery
+2 to balance when using a quarterstaff
+4 to jump when using a quarterstaff
+4 to trip attempts when using a quarterstaff or other polearm.I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2008-08-17, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Newcastle, Australia
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I think our DM has added a bonus to THACO when being a specialist with a Staff in our game in addition to those things
I like to re flavor the great club into a War staff (Derived from the Diablo II: Diablerie)
Tho it still puzzles me why a large lump of wood is a martial weapon and a Small lump of wood is a simple weaponLast edited by Leon; 2008-08-17 at 12:13 PM.
Thankyou to NEOPhyte for the Techpriest Engiseer
Spoiler
Current PC's
Ravia Del'Karro (Magos Biologis Errant)
Katarina (Ordo Malleus Interrogator)
Emberly (Fire Elemental former Chef)
Peril Planet
-
2008-08-17, 12:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Try using them both. Although the quarterstaff is simple by default. Of course, where the developers really screwed up was making the sling a simple weapon. Those things are harder to use than a bow.
I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2008-08-17, 12:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Happy Valley
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
The 'Simple/Martial' weapon categories are stupid to begin with. Having learned to use a sword, I can tell you it doesn't have anything to do with effectively using a halberd, yet for the same feat I get proficiency with both, as well as maces, bows, and other extremely varied weapons. Seriously, flails? Using a flail is a frickin' pain. My sword training is exactly no benefit with a flail. Slings are another good example, I've never been able to work the things, even though I'm good with a sword and competent with a bow. The feat Martial WP, and even Simple WP, should realistically take months of steady training to make you competent with that many very different weapons. I always use a homebrewed weapon proficiency system, and when using d20 I don't charge a feat for it, you get far too few of those for a weapon proficiency to be worth it.
Last edited by Prophaniti; 2008-08-17 at 12:26 PM.
Spending most of my time on another forum.
Awesome Daemonhost avatar by Fin.
-
2008-08-17, 12:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I like the idea, but I'd leave the damage where it is, at 1d4 small/1d6 medium. Yes, the quarterstaff is a very versatile weapon (I'm proficient with it myself, and can see how you would do all of the things you're describing with it), but there's still a reason most fighting folks use swords instead.
I'd also swap the double-weapon status with reach (i.e., make it count as a double weapon at Martial, and as a reach weapon at Exotic): It's easier to fight with both ends of a staff than it is to hold it by one end and reach out to strike with the other.
I like to re flavor the great club into a War staff (Derived from the Diablo II: Diablerie)
EDIT:
The 'Simple/Martial' weapon categories are stupid to begin with. Having learned to use a sword, I can tell you it doesn't have anything to do with effectively using a halberd, yet for the same feat I get proficiency with both, as well as maces, bows, and other extremely varied weapons.Last edited by Chronos; 2008-08-17 at 12:31 PM.
Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2008-08-17, 12:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2008-08-17, 12:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
There is some overlap. That said, the categories are a bit off. I can use a rapier, smallsword, and staff decently. On the other hand I'm not going to hit anything with a bow beyond 20 yards, and I can't fire with any speed. I'm worse with a sling(that said the sling is by far the harder weapon. I don't know what Wotc was smoking, but they had a bonfire in the central building when they came up with that. A crossbow is point and click. A bow is point, hold arrow in place, release properly while holding the bow. A sling is swing once, either overhand(this has the best distance, and the most power, that said its also the hardest to aim with) side hand, or underhand(by far the most accurate). For exceptionally long slings you might swing it over your head, but thats usually not a good idea.
I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2008-08-17, 12:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
I'd allow the quarterstaff to deal nonlethal damage (martial) and give +2 on trip attempts (exotic).
-
2008-08-17, 04:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2008-08-17, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
There's a thread over on Wizards that rated all weapons on a percentile system, with set markers for whether it should be Simple, Martial, or Exotic. If someone still has a link, that could be a big help here.
[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2008-08-17, 05:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Martial or not, I really don't think it's really resonable to give quarterstaff tripping.
Surely, it's well designed to hit someone in the leg, but which weapons aren't? After taking a hit with the sword to the leg, you can also be tripped, beacuse your leg can be off in the first place.
If axes don't have tripping quality, quarterstaff also shouldn't.Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2008-08-17, 08:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2008-08-17, 09:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
A quarterstaff gives you more leverage and a better angle than quite a few weapons. That said most polearms would be pretty good if you wanted to trip someone. A halberd for example is very easy.
I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2008-08-17, 09:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2008-08-17, 10:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Exactly, because of how well suited the halberd is to tripping.
I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2008-08-18, 07:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Newcastle, Australia
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Quarterstaff Rethought
Thankyou to NEOPhyte for the Techpriest Engiseer
Spoiler
Current PC's
Ravia Del'Karro (Magos Biologis Errant)
Katarina (Ordo Malleus Interrogator)
Emberly (Fire Elemental former Chef)
Peril Planet