Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: Reading to Posting Ratio
-
2003-10-07, 04:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Reading to Posting Ratio
So, I notice a lot more people stopping by this board and reading than start new topics or post. Just out of curiosity, what sort of topics or whatever would encourage more posting, do you think?
-
2003-10-07, 04:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
I thing we either agree too much with each other and therefore don't get a good debate going or most of us just don't like debating and those that do agree with each other and then don't get a good debate going.
I have absolutely no clue how to remedy this.
-
2003-10-07, 05:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- My Cave, Atlanta, GA
- Gender
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
It might just be the way that people read threads.
I tend to read a thread, but will not post if my viewpoint has been expressed or if I have nothing to add to a debate. I will continue to check on the thread throughout its life, thus increasing the "read times" but not adding much to the "posts."
As to posting Hot Topics for sparking discussions . . .
I haven't a clue.Let the Yaggle Gakkle-ing begin.
Beware! Beware!
All children of the 'ground
-
2003-10-07, 05:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
I think you have it with the agreeing, TKD...the population is not large enough for lots of different POV's. Looks like I'm going to have to start trolling my own message board. ::)
Any other thoughts?
-
2003-10-07, 05:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- New York City
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Invite members to post open posts on a specific topic. Sorta like guest speakers. Folks can turn you down, if they wanna, but perhaps you can get things going.
Funny gaming story threads are always fun ("Ninja!"). Or "what's the worst game/player/dm you've ever experienced?" could lead to some entertainment. That sort of thing.
-
2003-10-07, 05:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
I know I got a guy in my group to check out the site, but now I just need to get him on the boards. Maybe an XP bonus or something. :-/
-
2003-10-07, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Story thread are okay Ray, but they don't really generate post count and active discussion.
What we need is a good old fashion disagreement on something. The last one we had was about a campaign that a majority of people on the boards didn't play in so they couldn't participate. We need something similar, but in regards to open topic like the rules (it helps when there is more than one objective interpretation.)
-
2003-10-07, 05:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
True. Maybe we're all just too rational to get impassioned about these disagreements...
At any rate, I just stole a new message board game from the CoF that is lots of fun. You should go try it out in Friendly Banter.
-
2003-10-07, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Originally Posted by RawBearNYC
-
2003-10-07, 05:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- New York City
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
hey, i started a thread today, get off my back, Giant :P
-
2003-10-07, 05:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Well I for one am not shy when it comes to starting new topics. ;D
But sometimes I read posts and don't reply and it's simply a matter of time. Sometimes I have 10 minutes to read the new posts....but I don't have the 30 minutes it takes to reply to them.
-
2003-10-07, 06:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- New York City
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
And yet you still have 316 posts :o
-
2003-10-07, 07:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Rawbear cracks me up!
I think maybe people just like to read through the posts simply because they're at work or something. Also I think people on these boards are quite articulate so after I've read through them, I wouldn't want to post babble. I'm still new to this....We don\'t have to kill them, just hurt them really really badly....
-
2003-10-08, 10:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- New York City
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Babble to us, Nappy, we like it!
-
2003-10-08, 01:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Originally Posted by RawBearNYC
-
2003-10-11, 12:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Eastern Massachusetts
Re: Reading to Posting Ratio
Originally Posted by Nappy
Originally Posted by Nappy
As for babble, that's fine. I would hope that if you ever disagree with me on anything (GASP!!) you would take the time to explain the position enough so that I could understand where you're coming from, and thus either be convinced that you are, in actuallity and as unbelievable as it may seem, correct or try to disuade you from your silliness in holding positions other than mine!
I would also point out that, if you don't know it already, that humerous sarcasm can be very difficult to convey affectively through writing.\"But we must think of the golfers! Our retrorockets will scorch the green for at least 100 yards!\" &&-Batman, on why not to pursue the Joker.