Results 1 to 20 of 20
-
2008-11-01, 12:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
If I'm restrained or paralyzed or grappled or mentally influenced, can I still use ToB maneuvers? For example, to escape a grapple or chains, a Swordsage may wish to use Shadow Jaunt. To ge get rid of Hold Monster or a Suggestion effect, a Warblade may wish to use Iron Heart Surge. Can they do that?
-
2008-11-01, 12:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- N. California
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
You must be able to move to initiate a maneuver.
P. 38, 2nd column, "Initiating Maneuvers and Stances"
You may wish to open a discussion with your DM about what that entails, as that is the only line that mentions it and "able to move" is a little gray. Your DM might allow you to initiate shadow jaunt while grappled, since you can technically still move, or they may not.
Your DM may allow you to initiate Iron Heart Surge to become immune to a web spell for its duration (as opposed to erasing the entire web by sheer force of will), or they may not, in which case Surge is pretty much restricted to removing ray of fighter pwnage (enfeeblement).Last edited by Townopolis; 2008-11-01 at 12:25 AM.
Lantanese gnome avatar by the talented Honest Tiefling.
Don't call it a rework - 5e Ranger optional class features
-
2008-11-01, 12:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Auckland
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Yep, what Lordsmoothe said. Being able to move is required to use a maneuver just like being able to speak is required to cast a spell for a wizard (minus having the appropriate feat, of course).
-
2008-11-01, 12:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Page 31 one pretty clearly states 'you need to be able to move' in regards to stances and maneuvers. Considering that they are the martial form of magic, that makes sense in regards to things like Hold Person (no somatic components and no movement for maneuvers). The next page mentions grappling briefly, but basically the specific condition effects which maneuvers are available based on what they require you to do. As such, Shadow Jaunt is more a DM decision than anything else, Iron Heart Surge is a no because of the restraints of Hold Person.
-
2008-11-01, 12:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- N. California
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Actually, the passage about grappling implies that, by RAI, you could use Shadow Jaunt to escape it. The passage states that "the majority" of your maneuvers may be unusable. Of course, the majority of maneuvers are attacks, and you may well be wielding a weapon that can't be used in grapple, e.g. longsword. Except you could punch the guy grappling you with a maneuver.
In the end, it's still a DM decision, but that seems to be the RAI to me.Lantanese gnome avatar by the talented Honest Tiefling.
Don't call it a rework - 5e Ranger optional class features
-
2008-11-01, 12:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
So IHS basically does nothing that really matters?
-
2008-11-01, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- N. California
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
well, it won't break mind control, and it can't break action denial... so basically yeah. Str damage is the only real reason to use it.
Lantanese gnome avatar by the talented Honest Tiefling.
Don't call it a rework - 5e Ranger optional class features
-
2008-11-01, 12:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
It ends the sun, gravity, Solid Fog, and Dead Magic Zones.
[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2008-11-01, 12:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
IHS works on everything that doesn't make sense, and doesn't work on anything it obviously is meant to work on (IE: Domination, immobilization, fear effects, etc.)
-
2008-11-01, 01:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
-
2008-11-01, 01:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2008-11-01, 02:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
What would be a reasonable list of Conditions that IHS ends?
-
2008-11-01, 02:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Of things it should end? IMO...
-Paralyzed
-Dazed
-Dazzled
-Hold Person
-Entangled
-Stunned
-Exhausted
-Fatigued
Personally I'd just houserule that it is a swift action which bypasses the "Cannot take actions" line of such effects, and negates these effects.Sig'd
-
2008-11-01, 04:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Ownageville (OV)
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
My Work:
Tome of House Rules Excerpts:
New Items:Spoiler
New PrCs:
Spoiler
2 to be posted.
-
2008-11-01, 11:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Theres also sickened, shaken, blindness/deafness and possibly energy drain.
Interestingly, ability Burn is the 1st thing they list under Conditions, so I wonder if it can remove that. If you can, you're just 1 step away from Body Fuel abuseLast edited by JeminiZero; 2008-11-01 at 11:22 AM.
-
2008-11-01, 11:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Add "after you use it, if you got hid of the effect, you lose the rest of your actions until the end of your turn", so you can't IHS and automatically make another attack in the same turn, that was probably the intended effect. if you think that it being a swift action would make it too good.
Member of the Hinjo fan club. Go Hinjo!
"In Soviet Russia, the Darkness attacks you."
"Rogues not only have a lot more skill points, but sneak attack is so good it hurts..."
-
2008-11-01, 12:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- ...
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Warriors & Wuxia: A community world-building project focused on low-magic wuxia/kung-fu action using ToB.
"These 'no-nonsense' solutions of yours just don't hold water in a complex world of jet-powered apes and time travel."
-
2008-11-01, 05:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
I think the OP's question has been answered, but there's another maneuver-related thing I'd like to point out: Nothing seems to indicate that maneuvers CANNOT be performed when one transforms into a non-humanoid form. For example, a werewolf in wolf form can actually execute Elder Mountain Hammer with its bite!
The logical result of this was that I have an order of hobgoblin swordsages in my world who are bred with lycanthropy in my campaign.
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2008-11-01, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: Do you need mobility to perform Maneuvers?
Personally, I think IHS should be something like an immediate action, which dazes you the next turn, but grants the attack bonus the round after. Just make it resist/negate the effects of the abilities you want it to block.
-
2008-11-01, 10:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2006