Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 1+2nd Ed?

  1. - Top - End - #1
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Grumbolt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008

    Default 1+2nd Ed?

    Ok, I know I'm old (dead for a goblin), but anyone else here miss 1st or 2nd ed.? Remember back When Gygax was the man, Orcus was a pain, and Vecna was just a hand?
    Last edited by Grumbolt; 2008-11-23 at 09:31 PM.
    Never underestimate a little green goblin with a plan...
    Tanks tah Arokh for da nice picture!!! Me not eat him...

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Librarian in the Playground Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    If you bring it up, there are a number of us who like to talk about Advanced Dungeons and Dragons.

    You might also want to check out www.dragonsfoot.org, which is a TSR D&D/AD&D board.
    The Cranky Gamer
    *It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
    *Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
    *Two Tales of Tellene, available from DriveThruFiction
    *The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
    Avatar is from local user Mehangel
    Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
    If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Captain Six's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    I play 2E AD&D online. The DM openly disliked 3.5 but ran it because that's what people played. A lot of people did that I heard. After 4E came out and a significant portion of the players reject it outright he was inspired to go back to the game he liked and the players followed. I didn't know the rules but my favorite part of that particular game was when we were at the inn after a long, hard adventure.

    I played a human sorcerer and the similarity of the spells made the transition easy. Because sorcerers had become a part of his homebrew world's lore the DM decided that Cha-based wizards using the spell point channeled variant would fill the role. I can't say I know much about 1E, but I see the appeal of second. 3.5 is still my favorite, I like feeling like I crafted a character and all the complexities of 3.x is why I like it.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Matthew's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Mark is spot on. Anybody who misses first and second edition has access to several online communities, ongoing fan projects, and a new generation of AD&D compatible modules using the OGL via simulacrum games like OSRIC and Labyrinth Lord. No need to remember those days, for many of us they never went away.

    Captain Six: Does your game master go by the handle of TaliesinNYC, by any chance?
    It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.

    – Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The midwest.

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    I'm plaing a 2e game now, run by my sister's fiancee. I don't know why he never converted to 3e (I've never asked), but if I had to guess I'd say it's because he has at least a thousand dollars woth 2e material, including all four Encyclopedia Magica, several boxed adventures and setting books, and because he wasn't really playing D&D at the time 3e rolled out. I loaned my 3e books to him, but he has yet to take a look at them because he's pretty busy most of the time.

    I started with 2e, and it's nice to be playing it again for the nostalgic feel, and for the fact that the disparity between warriors and casters seems to be less proounced (note the SEEMS TO BE). On the other hand, 2e is a hell of a lot less intuitive and balanced- for example, your chance to save against two Fireballs, one from a 5th level wizard, and one from a 40th level wizard, is identical. Your chance to save against all poisons is identical, whether it's food poisoning or the venom from the tiger snake, or even the venom from a Poisonsword (save or die instantly, if you fail you take 2d12 poison damage anyway).

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Captain Six's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew View Post
    Captain Six: Does your game master go by the handle of TaliesinNYC, by any chance?
    ...

    Yes. Rob/Rynn here for the Friday night game. Small World.
    Last edited by Captain Six; 2008-11-24 at 11:22 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Librarian in the Playground Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shpadoinkle View Post
    I started with 2e, and it's nice to be playing it again for the nostalgic feel, and for the fact that the disparity between warriors and casters seems to be less proounced (note the SEEMS TO BE). On the other hand, 2e is a hell of a lot less intuitive and balanced- for example, your chance to save against two Fireballs, one from a 5th level wizard, and one from a 40th level wizard, is identical. Your chance to save against all poisons is identical, whether it's food poisoning or the venom from the tiger snake, or even the venom from a Poisonsword (save or die instantly, if you fail you take 2d12 poison damage anyway).
    AD&D had a very different conception of what a saving throw was than 3rd edition. AD&D's saving throws are more akin to 4e's saving throws... luck and chance allowing you to get out of the way or resist. 3e's saves are more akin to 4e's defenses... your skill and attributes allowing you to resist an effect. As to why level counted in AD&D saves, it was because higher-level people were luckier... represented in larger HP and in better saves.
    The Cranky Gamer
    *It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
    *Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
    *Two Tales of Tellene, available from DriveThruFiction
    *The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
    Avatar is from local user Mehangel
    Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
    If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    ken-do-nim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mansfield, MA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shpadoinkle View Post
    On the other hand, 2e is a hell of a lot less intuitive and balanced- for example, your chance to save against two Fireballs, one from a 5th level wizard, and one from a 40th level wizard, is identical.
    Actually the 2E supplement High Level Campaigns offered a "fix" for that.
    Casting level:
    1-12 no save penalty
    13-15 -1
    16-18 -2
    19-21 -3
    22-24 -4
    25-27 -5
    28-30 -6
    31-33 -7
    34-36 -8
    36-38 -9
    39-41 -10

    So therefore the save against a 40th level wizard is made at -10, and using the 1E rules for magic resistance at (40-11= 29 x5 = 145) -145% off. I'd say that's pretty powerful!

    Oh, and there's actually plenty of people playing earlier editions out there and online. I've never wished to play any edition or clone of D&D and not found a group that plays it.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Thurbane's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Terra Australis
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Cut my teeth on AD&D 1E and a little Basic (red box), but most of my gaming was AD&D 2E. A lot of fond memories. All great games.

    As much as people will poopoo this edition or that, 90% of objections to a given edition are purely personal preference. I've had hellafun playing all of the above, and continue to do so in 3.5

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2008

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    I don't miss 2nd. 1st I do. Sorta. I played back when 2nd was around, got heavy into 3.5 (kinda skipped 3). Finally after both I got to 1st ed, and I loved it. Silly rules, espically on the barbarian, made it fun and fairly quick.

    Beyond that 3.5 I like for its awesome complexity.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    ken-do-nim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mansfield, MA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Thurbane View Post
    I've had hellafun playing all of the above, and continue to do so in 3.5
    That's the key I think; playing 3.5 is fun. I burnt out on 3.5 when I tried to DM it (12th level party). Now I'm starting to get back into it. I have yet to decide where I would draw the line on what is legal if I did run it again though.

    I'm running a 1st edition pbp right now and having a lot of fun with it (maxed out at 8 players). I'm also playing in a 2nd edition pbp that the DM has put an impressive amount of creativity into, though it only updates about once a week (PM me if you want to join; we could use 1 more player). On top of those I'm playing in a Labyrinth Lord game that is pure awesome (Matthew is in that one as well), a well-paced Holmes D&D game, and a 1st edition game that I wish would move a little quicker.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    IMO every edition has made some good and some bad changes. I actually have more experiance with 2E than 3.X even though I've only been playing about 5 years. (This was due to the fact that my first DM was not familiar with 3E until long after it came out.) I still miss some of the stuff from earlier editions but I feel that it's easiest to play 3.x and houserule in anything you especially like from other editions.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Matthew's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 1+2nd Ed?

    Quote Originally Posted by ken-do-nim View Post
    On top of those I'm playing in a Labyrinth Lord game that is pure awesome (Matthew is in that one as well)...
    Yeah, Kipper has obviously put a lot of effort into that game, and it shows through in play. A lot of fun.
    It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.

    – Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •