Results 391 to 420 of 1012
-
2008-11-30, 07:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- I'm a Protagonist!
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
1. True seeing on a arcane eye device. (SUPER CAM!) this detects magic auras (without the overwhelm.), and does the basic true seeing effects.
Yes
2. A divintation effect 2 days ahead of the current security feed that is recorded on seprate tapes. This also has a true seeing effect present.
No - its too much Godmod
3. A 2ft lead lining in between the walls. Preventing horrible strcutural damage (Ie. go through the lead in addition to the walls.), raditiaon prevention, and also prevents scry's INTO the base, but not if the scryer is already within the base.
Sure
4. A mordinkaidens private sanctum effect on all the rooms within GLoG.
No
5. A Prismatic wall effect for anybody who fails the above scans.
No
6. A X-ray scan on everyone who goes through. (non radioactive.)
No
7. Protection from evil on the entire base.
Yes
8. A replusion effect on any EVIL creature who does not speak the pass word: I shall do no harm.
Yes
9. A SHADES spell that produces a correct spell against the alignment of the trangressor as such: Good: Dominate monster commandign them to HALT! Lawful evil: Maw of chaos. Chaotic evil: Flurry wings (Draconomicon)
Neutral evil: Holy word, Holy SMITE heightened to 9th lvl.
Unframiliar
10. Keep the no-unauthorized-teleporting thing within the base, but the grounds are open
Yes
11. Alignment scanners
Yes
12. A blessing to anyone of good alignment
Yes
13. Hallow.
Sure?
14. Greater Sanctuary, target: Everyone.
Details
15. Remove the ban on the anti-magic-field spell. Since we're not playing D and D, we can ignore it's broken-ness. People can try and create anti-magic effects, but the people targeted by the spell get to say how much it affects them.
Yes, within reason. If anybody godmods the beejesus out of this, I'm going to be mildly upsetNaNoWriMo Beat Me
Red and the Phasmavore by LCP
Spoiler: Character Sheets
-
2008-11-30, 07:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Feel free to disregard my obvious bias.
1. True seeing on a arcane eye device. (SUPER CAM!) this detects magic auras (without the overwhelm.), and does the basic true seeing effects.
No
2. A divintation effect 2 days ahead of the current security feed that is recorded on seprate tapes. This also has a true seeing effect present.
No
3. A 2ft lead lining in between the walls. Preventing horrible strcutural damage (Ie. go through the lead in addition to the walls.), raditiaon prevention, and also prevents scry's INTO the base, but not if the scryer is already within the base.
No
4. A mordinkaidens private sanctum effect on all the rooms within GLoG.
No
5. A Prismatic wall effect for anybody who fails the above scans.
No
6. A X-ray scan on everyone who goes through. (non radioactive.)
No
7. Protection from evil on the entire base.
No
8. A replusion effect on any EVIL creature who does not speak the pass word: I shall do no harm.
No
9. A SHADES spell that produces a correct spell against the alignment of the trangressor as such: Good: Dominate monster commandign them to HALT! Lawful evil: Maw of chaos. Chaotic evil: Flurry wings (Draconomicon)
Neutral evil: Holy word, Holy SMITE heightened to 9th lvl.
HELL NO
10. Keep the no-unauthorized-teleporting thing within the base, but the grounds are open
No
11. Alignment scanners
Yes
12. A blessing to anyone of good alignment
Yes
13. Hallow.
No
14. Greater Sanctuary, target: Everyone.
No
15. Remove the ban on the anti-magic-field spell. Since we're not playing D and D, we can ignore it's broken-ness. People can try and create anti-magic effects, but the people targeted by the spell get to say how much it affects them.
YesLast edited by Darkcomet; 2008-11-30 at 09:30 PM.
Avatar by Ashen Lilies.
Spoiler
by Happyturtle and Ashen Lilies
FFR Links:
-
2008-11-30, 08:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Catching 'em all
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Why are so many people voting against the private sanctum one?
-
2008-11-30, 08:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- In the shadows
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 08:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- avatar by Ashen Lilies
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Spell description here.
It just sounds creepy. Not being able to hear the person in the next room? looking in and seeing only darkness? Just... creepy.
-
2008-11-30, 08:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Catching 'em all
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
-
2008-11-30, 08:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- I'm a Protagonist!
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
NaNoWriMo Beat Me
Red and the Phasmavore by LCP
Spoiler: Character Sheets
-
2008-11-30, 08:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- In the shadows
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
I just didn't like that the people inside the room, can't talk to each other, either.
16- I want anti-scrying effects on private rooms. So no creepy wizard is watching Melody sleep, get dressed in the morning, or take a shower.
-
2008-11-30, 08:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- avatar by Ashen Lilies
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
You guys are free to make up your own privacy effects.
Just number them 16, 17, and so on, and we'll vote on them too.
-
2008-11-30, 08:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Or each one could... You know. Hire an NPC to make a defensive measure for a specific, personal room.
-
2008-11-30, 08:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Or we could just ignore Draken entirely.
Cause he proly has a plan to get past our defenses.
Anyway I dont see what Structural reinforcement could do to be bad cause you know... We have problems with VERY powerful enemies, and to be honest the problem with Mordinkaidens private sanctum cna be fixed by just saying that it prevents people from looking in once you activate a command word.
Makes Private things private you know.
-
2008-11-30, 08:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- I'm a Protagonist!
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Suggestion 16-ish:
GLoG has a Private QIS Box that has been domesticated. He is trained to swallow - and immediatly spit out and never comepletly eat - Deadtime'd player. A Deadtimer being QIS'd should go without saying.NaNoWriMo Beat Me
Red and the Phasmavore by LCP
Spoiler: Character Sheets
-
2008-11-30, 09:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Catching 'em all
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 09:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
That was uncalled for Fanboy.
Anyway. Rebonack was the person who first coined the "Deadtime" term. And it doesn't just mean the player is gone. Deadtime is in fact, a state characters enter when their players are away (Fourth wall breakage not included, woohoo). It's like being, as the name implies, stuck in time, unchangeable, immovable, ect, ect. Deadtimed people don't need extra defenses. Deadtime alone is a defense, the best one.
-
2008-11-30, 09:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
-
2008-11-30, 09:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Catching 'em all
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
-
2008-11-30, 09:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- I'm a Protagonist!
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Surprise, that wasn't a real suggestion, it was to point out the ludicrous-ness of throwing out spell names from ten and a half million different splatbooks. Seriously, describe the effect with words, not spell names.
SpoilerQIS, by the way, stands for Quantum Indeterminate State, something used on the weregeek board PbPs, and have yet to see used here.
A player who has not posted for a while has his character "Swallowed" by the QIS, taking the character out of the action in a DEADTIME-like effect. In combat, the box will also swallow some enemies to keep the encounter balanced.
After being QIS'd for a while (The player drops from the game), the Character is said to have been eaten by the QIS.NaNoWriMo Beat Me
Red and the Phasmavore by LCP
Spoiler: Character Sheets
-
2008-11-30, 09:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
I ignored defenses I can't even make heads or tails of (seriously, the two days in advance detect thing? I don't know what the heck it is supposed to do). No one really ever made a single complaint*.
*No one with whom I interacted at the time at least. Thinking again. I think you are the only person wh ever complained. Not even Masato complained if I recall, and his defenses were actually "lolindestructiblebarrier".
-
2008-11-30, 09:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 09:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
1- I didn't even know what was there. I worked my way around alignment detection, teleport block and a few other simple stuff. But some of the weirder stuff? I actually did not even know they even existed up to the point you listed it all on the other OOC thread and started this entire votation.
-
2008-11-30, 09:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Fanboy is a rather all out person. ALOT of the stuff was rather crazy as a maw of chaos is a caster level capless Disentergrate, Flurry Wings is the same thing except it does Force damage, and has a Range of 300ft, and requires no touch attack.
All spells on par with Gaterape stratgems.
-
2008-11-30, 09:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
I know what these spells are. There is just some stuff I can't see a point to being there.
Also. In all reality. You are Lawful Neutral. If not Lawful Miko.
-
2008-11-30, 09:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- I'm a Protagonist!
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Thanatos: +1 ignored post
Fanboy & Draken: Stop bickering.NaNoWriMo Beat Me
Red and the Phasmavore by LCP
Spoiler: Character Sheets
-
2008-11-30, 09:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 09:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Sorry Thanatos. Just didn't see anything I could comment on your post that wouldn't be completely innane.
And Fanboy. I mean IC. Alignments don't work well in the real life.
-
2008-11-30, 09:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Ah, how is Fanboy lawful neutral? The alignement is stated as being the Judge... I figured I'm more of a vengeful CG.
-
2008-11-30, 09:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons
Ah. Sorry. I thought you considered him to be Lawful Good. What I actually meant is that I wouldn't give his behaviour a run past any DM to see if you qualify for a bip in the Detect Good-o-meter.
Blargh. I keep writing you instead of him. Just consider I am talking about the character. To much time writing IC or half-IC.Last edited by Draken; 2008-11-30 at 10:00 PM.
-
2008-11-30, 10:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 10:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Over thattaway
- Gender
-
2008-11-30, 10:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Southern Wildlands
- Gender
Re: GLoG OOC Chat Thread I: Sporks vs Foons