Results 1 to 23 of 23
Thread: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
-
2011-02-06, 08:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
[3.5] Monsters and grappling
I've been DMing a campaign for the better part of the last year, and the adventure I'm using has quite a number of monsters that grapple as part of their tactics.
However, what I'm finding is that when a monster grapples, it loses DEX and AoO, which means the rest of the party step up and beat it senseless. Sure, for monsters who get a bucketload of speacial damage on a grapple (i.e. Behirs) it's worthwhile, but so far I've grappled with a Chilcera and Shadow Demon (among others), and found that the monster just ends up getting curbstomped before it can inflict serious damage on it's victim. I suspect a large part of it is that I have a 6 player party, with 3 solid melee types (Barbarian, Duskblade and Charging Smite Paladin/KoTR), and the encounters have been outnumbered by the party.
So how about it? Am I doing it wrong? Is there tips to making monsters grapple more effectively? Is it only worthwhile for creatures with really nasty abilities they can use in a grapple?My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2011-02-06, 08:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
From Improved Grab:
"Unless otherwise noted, improved grab works only against opponents at least one size category smaller than the creature. The creature has the option to conduct the grapple normally, or simply use the part of its body it used in the improved grab to hold the opponent. If it chooses to do the latter, it takes a -20 penalty on grapple checks, but is not considered grappled itself; the creature does not lose its Dexterity bonus to AC, still threatens an area, and can use its remaining attacks against other opponents."
If its grapple check is considerably higher than its opponent's, it should conduct the grapple at a -20 so it's not considered to be grappled itself. Its opponent cannot take any special grapple actions, because he doesn't have the monster grappled, but he is still in the monster's grips and subject to its special grapple-based attacks.
There's a feat in the Draconomicon called Multisnatch that reduces that penalty to a -10, which makes it extremely good for monsters who have a high grapple bonus and improved grab on multiple different natural weapons.
Edit: Also note that if it attacks the grabbed opponent with a different weapon than the one holding it, it would be considered an attack from outside the grapple and the grabbed opponent would lose his Dex bonus to AC against it.Last edited by Biffoniacus_Furiou; 2011-02-06 at 08:45 PM.
-
2011-02-06, 08:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Ohio, USA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Grappling is, quite simply, a helmet-wearingly retarded tactic if you're out-numbered. Your enemies will mince you and there won't be anything you can do about it because you've hindered yourself as much as you've hindered your enemy.
Unless a monster has special rules regarding its abilities in a grapple, it's better off staying mobile.
-
2011-02-06, 08:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
@ Biffoniacus_Furiou
Good advice - unfortuntely, though, none of the monsters had a good enough grapple mod to make a -20 check worth it. Good to know about the Multisnatch feat, though.
Yeah, pretty much what I figured. The monsters I grappled with did have special grapple based attacks, but the payoff just wasn't worth it.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2011-02-06, 09:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
If a monster can fly, it should try to carry away its victim. I don't even think you need to make a grapple check to do that, just check its encumbrance against the victim's total weight. Grappling doesn't prevent it from using its wings after all, and if it can use magical flight or Levitate then that's just as good.
-
2011-02-06, 09:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
You'd still have to make a Grapple check to move the grapple, and if your fly speed isn't good enough, have to do so every round or you stall, and hit the ground. Of course, that leads to amusing half-hops and regular falling damage, which amuses me anyway.
Pokemon friend code : 3067-5701-8746
Trade list can be found on my Giant League wiki page, all pokemon are kept in stock with 5 IVs, most with egg moves, some bred for Hidden Powers. Currently at 55 in stock and counting.
Padherders for my phone and my tablet!
-
2011-02-06, 10:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Grappling is definitely not a good idea if the entire party is free to just gang up on it. Ideally, the party should be busy with stuff on one side of them while something sneaks up and grapples a weaker PC from the other side. Or grapple anyone foolish enough to charge past the monsters and isolate themselves. Either way, when the enemy tanks are gone the grappling monster should probably try to flee (or at least stop grappling) and probably try to take a hostage along for the ride.
-
2011-02-06, 11:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Stupid Grappling Trick, assuming your monster is at least BAB +6 (and so gets 2 grapple actions) and has Constrict, which most grapple specialist monsters do:
Make the initial grapple. As part of this process, Constrict, because you have to make a grapple check. Now, for your second grapple action- attempt to Escape From The Grapple. When you succeed that opposed grapple check, you Constrict again, along with anything else the particular monster may do on a successful grapple. Now your monster has taken its target, done its damage, and is not in a grapple. Repeat until you run out of BAB/natural weapons with Improved Grab.
-
2011-02-06, 11:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
-
2011-02-06, 11:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Well, yeah. I did say it was a Stupid Trick. And I wouldn't suggest it, except that 'voluntarily quit grappling' doesn't actually seem to be an option- you can only do that if you pin the dude first (although that works too, since releasing from a pin is a free action- you can go Start Grapple+Constrict ->Attempt Pin+Constrict->let target go from Pin, GOTO 1.)
Edit: Mind, a lot of grapple monsters are not especially smart and should not be attempting these kinds of shenanigans, as they require an unusual awareness of the vulnerabilities you create for yourself when you grapple something else.Last edited by tyckspoon; 2011-02-06 at 11:07 PM.
-
2011-02-06, 11:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
My party recently fought purple worms and a shadow spider, and yeah, their grapple abilities work well enough with a -20 penalty that it's worthwhile. Unless their target is an enlarged CoDzilla/psychic warrior, there's no chance of winning against their massive grapple mods. Size is a big part of it (especially since that also determines what the monster can swallow). Since there are more humongous creatures in the upper CRs, you're likely to find grappling to be more and more effective against the party (or at least make them more and more paranoid about keeping freedom of movement running).
-
2011-02-06, 11:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
CONSTRICT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY!Originally Posted by Rules Compendium
-
2011-02-06, 11:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
While that does make more sense, I hate having to refer to the Rules Compendium for things. Errata that you have to pay for completely destroys the purpose of errata. Which is to say, Constrict *did* work that way, and does work that way if you don't have a copy of the Rules Compendium in play.
Last edited by tyckspoon; 2011-02-06 at 11:21 PM.
-
2011-02-06, 11:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Note however that making a grapple check to damage an opponent, whether with a natural weapon or with unarmed strike damage, is considered melee damage.
Power Attack takes a penalty on attack rolls to gain a bonus on melee damage rolls. You can Power Attack for your full BAB, then make grapple checks (which aren't attack rolls) to damage your opponent, and benefit from the Power Attack bonus damage. The Frost Giant Mauler in Frostburn is designed around doing this exact trick, although WotC has officially stated that something-for-nothing tricks like this should not be permitted.
-
2011-02-06, 11:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- In an apartment
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
It's also amusing to utilize the Fling Enemy feat from Races of Stone. If your monster is getting annoyed by one of the players initiate your grapple and do your damage, then next round toss him off a cliff or something.
-
2011-02-07, 07:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Cleveland, OH
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Horribly inefficient. Rather than blow a feat on Fling Enemy, just grapple, and assuming your opponent's weight is under your Max Press, just throw them as an improvised weapon on your next iterative attack. It's not like you care whether the -4 nonproficieny penalty causes you to miss... it's not that hard to hit a square, anyway.
Handbooks:
Shax's Indispensable Haversack, TWF OffHandbook
Builds:
Archon of Nine, Jellobomber, King of Pong, Lightning Thief
Spells:
Druidzilla, Healbot, Gish
Iron Chef:
-
2011-02-07, 07:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
-
2011-02-07, 08:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Grapple would be a good way for a creature with multiple natural attacks to quickly and efficiently disable 1-2 PCs. For example, a dragon can snatch a PC in its jaws and hold him there, while possibly constricting another PC with its tail, leaving it free to still rend another player with its claws+rapidstrike routine. With its high bab, large size and superior strength, it can easily take the -20 grapple penalty.
My humble efforts at re-cr'ing MM2
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=215727
-
2011-02-07, 08:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
There's a straightforward solution here: grapple all the PCs. Use more grappling enemies, or enemies capable of getting multiple PCs into the grapple, or some combination.
-
2011-02-07, 09:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
-
2011-02-07, 04:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
OK...seems most of my problems come from 2 issues: the party outnumbering the monsters in the encounters, and the monsters in the module not being particularly great grapplers.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2011-02-07, 04:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- A mound of Rainbowflesh
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Monsters and grappling
Yeah, if the monster isn't great at grappling, just run it differently. We've encountered this too in a few situations. A large monster will grab someone, and we all promptly beat it into submission. The DM has since stopped trying to grapple us with anything but the nastiest of grapplers.
-
2011-02-07, 05:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010