Results 361 to 390 of 518
Thread: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
-
2021-09-27, 07:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
We have seen V cast Stoneskin in the fights with the Linear Guild, Tarquin's army, and the vampires in the banquet hall. V probably should have cast it while in the Forcecage surrounded by vampires, but that's it for recent fights (unless there's something I'm forgetting). The fight with the frost giants mainly took place at a distance where the biggest threat to V that would be reduced by DR was nonmagical rocks, so let's assume that V casts Protection from Arrows every morning along with Overland Flight (can we at least agree that this is a reasonable assumption?) and decided that would be sufficient. As a general rule, V seems to be using the basic protections that we know they have.
Also, I wouldn't get your hopes up for seeing optimal 3.5 strategies any time soon.
-
2021-09-27, 08:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Wasn't there a quote about buffing happening off panel too?
-
2021-09-27, 08:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Oh interesting. In #919 I noticed an interesting side effect of not casting Protection from Arrows on one's self every morning, the spell slot is still available should a better use. (assuming he only prepares one use)
People have been talking as if there was absolutely nothing to be gained by waiting to buff when it is needed, but that's simply not true. Waiting gives you the flexibility to find a better way to use the spell. Even on a long-duration self-only buff, waiting still means you don't risk partially using it up or losing it to a dispel in some inconsequential fight.
Just to be clear, I don't dispute there are also advantages to buffing early as a gamble that having an extra action in a surprise encounter is more useful than having the flexibility to do whatever else you could have done. I'm not even arguing how anyone should value the alternatives in deciding how to prepare.
I'm just arguing that it is not an entirely irrational strategy to employ.
While flipping through some older fights, I notice in #800 that V espouses a much less optimistic view about being able to prepare for every threat than some posters here. That surely influences his decision to make different choices than some posters here.Last edited by Hurkyl; 2021-09-27 at 08:32 AM.
-
2021-09-27, 08:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
-
2021-09-27, 08:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Waterworld
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Well, Roy could definitely be Power Attacking whenever he attacks if it's so important to fighter play, as lampshaded by https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0604.html where Hank tells Yor the fighter he doesn't actually have to yell "POWER ATTACK" every time he charges and yor says he just wants to fit in with the rogues constantly declaring their sneak attacks.
https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots1040.html
Good ol' infernal roaches
-
2021-09-27, 02:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Yeah, by “use power responsibly”, I think they meant “don’t commit genocide out of spite”, not “give up this blaster nonsense and become a proper Batman”. We have seen V show complex tactics…Mostly post that character development. See: using Yikyik to attack Z instead of trying to go it alone. Old V would never have, because one of their major flaws was an inability to accept the help of others due to their ego (this is probably why they don’t do summoning: V wants to show off, they want to have the enemy know when they get to hell who sent them, not hide between summons). V has clearly developed, that they aren’t dominating encounters is mainly a consequence of poor optimization from before they became a wiser person, and nor should they be dominating every fight as you seem to wish they would.
-
2021-09-27, 03:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
There's really no question V is the strongest in the party, that's already established.
The real question is why stuff like protection from arrows is not an automatic cast every single day when it lasts 18 hours at V's current probable level. Like, V does trance 6 hours a day, so why would it not be in constant effect? Much like overland flight, there's no reason it should not be operating all the time. When you are in a hectic situation (like in a forcecage with vampires surrounding you, or waiting to ambush Xykon) you should also always have buffs that last 3 hours in effect, like stoneskin.
The monsters they are facing are now strong enough that hopefully we can see more of V employing their full gamut of spells at any rate. V already overcomes stuff the others have no business even surviving against (Black Dragons, Pit Fiends, High end casters, etc), it'd be nice if the handcuffs were taken off and V could stick around for some of these fights more often.Last edited by TooSoon; 2021-09-27 at 03:56 PM.
-
2021-09-27, 04:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Black dragon, singular. Darth!V's capabilities are not indicative of V's actual efficacy.
Pit Fiends,
High end casters, etc),
Also, Laurin is technically a manifester, rather than a caster.
it'd be nice if the handcuffs were taken off and V could stick around for some of these fights more often.
-
2021-09-27, 04:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Didn't V lose against Z the time they dominated the kobold? They got planeshifted out. Depends on how you define winning and losing, I guess, but they got removed from the battlefield. I guess it might be more of a tie since Z immediately collapsed and was arrested.
-
2021-09-27, 05:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
That's why the V and D connection had to lower it's saves until it was hittable.
"Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman
-
2021-09-27, 05:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
1) The adolescent Black Dragon would probably trash Roy, Hayley, Elan and Belkar even now.
2) V showed they could beat an Ancient Black Dragon who doesn't have an Anti-magic field, if not for that the ABD would be trapped in a forcecage. They just happened to be against an Ancient Black Dragon who was also a level 17 Sorcerer, when V himself was only level 13 at the time. If the Ancient Black Dragon rocked up today it would destroy all 5 other party members even at their current levels.
3) V did beat the pit fiend, and plenty of plausible explanations could be given for how V might beat one now. The rest of the party could not.
4) Laurin would destroy the rest of the Order is the point. Without V there Tarquin would also have destroyed the rest of the order. Tarquin would still destroy the rest of the order, yet V could one shot him.
5) As I already explain on the previous page, V used the Kobold to beat Z. Without V there to nullify Z's magic, and to exhaust Z's magic in the lead up to his using the Kobold, Z would/could have one shot the Kobold.
-
2021-09-27, 05:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Last edited by hamishspence; 2021-09-27 at 05:46 PM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2021-09-27, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
In fairness the Dragon could also have teleported out of the Forcecage, so V's stalemate would not have lasted regardless. V could however have protected themselves within a forcecage at least, then gotten the right spells to challenge it. Anyhow, the point is V at least has a chance to competently fight the dragon, whereas if the Dragon turned up to fight the order (minus V), even at their current level, they would be wrecked, even without an Anti-Magic Field.
Last edited by TooSoon; 2021-09-27 at 06:16 PM.
-
2021-09-27, 06:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
I find that quote by The Giant to be extremely strong evidence of how the system constraints of D&D 3.5 impede the story of OOTS, especially in combat, often in highly significant ways. The difference is that I think the adjustments made go well be 'non-perfect tactics' all the way down into 'genuinely bad tactics.'
But I get it. High-level 3.5e combat is bad. The system is broken, and even played straight the combination of hp inflation and SoD proliferation means that a straight fight is mostly about flinging around effects and waiting for someone to fail a saving throw which is extremely non-compelling (and the comic famously did the cleric vs. cleric fight in Azure City to make precisely this point).
The general tactic in comic to make fights workable involves finding some way to either remove full casters from the battlefield entirely or to nerf them when present. Perfectly understandable. The issue is, this hasn't been done consistently. Stickworld doesn't operate under some set of house rules designed to nerf casters outlined in a session zero, it bounces around according to the needs of the moment. It's a serial production, so of course that's the case, but that's one of the risks of producing serial works - if you make some kind of mistake, like attaching your fantasy epic to a mechanical system that becomes dysfunctional across the upper third of its progression - you can't take it back.
The author's choices to wrestle with the system are better than the alternative. Roy is not useless, based on how the comic has actually unfolded, but he should be based on how the system operates and the individual character builds in play.
-
2021-09-27, 06:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Useless is a little strong. Even a doorstop is useful. Sure, a brick could do the same thing, but it still has a use. Roy and the non-casters can indeed contribute, especially with V not having conjuration, but they are far less useful than V and it shouldn't even be close.
-
2021-09-27, 06:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
-
2021-09-27, 08:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
The quote is pretty useful for pointing out where the author stands. It's fair to consider the things being discussed "flaws" but they're flaws that will never be corrected because the author himself does not hold that view, which is also fair, especially since it's his story.
It's just a difference in priority of what would improve the story, and while everyone is entitled to opinions on that, it's probably generally better if author's right stories they'd personally find themselves engaged with, over what other people would consider "better".I'd just like to point out that saying that something unsupported is the case unless someone else can prove that it is not is an utter failure of logic. - Kish
-
2021-09-28, 06:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2020
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Never questioned that.
2) V showed they could beat an Ancient Black Dragon who doesn't have an Anti-magic field, if not for that the ABD would be trapped in a forcecage. They just happened to be against an Ancient Black Dragon who was also a level 17 Sorcerer, when V himself was only level 13 at the time.
If the Ancient Black Dragon rocked up today it would destroy all 5 other party members even at their current levels.
3) V did beat the pit fiend, and plenty of plausible explanations could be given for how V might beat one now. The rest of the party could not.
4) Laurin would destroy the rest of the Order is the point.
Without V there Tarquin would also have destroyed the rest of the order. Tarquin would still destroy the rest of the order,
yet V could one shot him.
5) As I already explain on the previous page, V used the Kobold to beat Z. Without V there to nullify Z's magic, and to exhaust Z's magic in the lead up to his using the Kobold, Z would/could have one shot the Kobold.
(Further, RatElemental raises a valid point: in-universe, people keep saying V won, but while Z certainly didn't (he was trying to kill V and failed to achieve that objective), whether the fight counts as a victory for V depends mainly on what their objective was. And the thing is, judging by the last thing V told Z before getting Plane Shifted heavily implies that V wanted to kill Z too, which they failed to achieve.)
-
2021-09-28, 06:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Another minor point, but as far as save or die spells go phantasmal killer is pretty spectacularly bad. It offers two separate saves, has a middling DC (14+int mod for wizards if not heightened) and if the target makes either save they don't die. If they make the first save it just straight up does nothing and if they fail the first but make the second they only take 3d6 damage. Yukyuk was probably in practically 0 danger from that spell at all.
I always took Z using that spell as the giant showing they were on the ropes and out of options.Last edited by RatElemental; 2021-09-28 at 06:27 AM.
-
2021-09-29, 10:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-09-30, 12:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Location
- Magrathea
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Honestly, I'd just ask why Z prepared that spell at all or even learned it, it seems like it would be a waste of a slot under typical circumstances.
Then again, maybe he got it from a booster packAn explanation of why MitD being any larger than Huge is implausible.
See my extended signature here! May contain wit, candor, and somewhere from 52 to 8127 walruses.
Purple is humorous descriptions made up on the fly
Green is serious talk about hypothetical
Blue is irony and sarcasm
"I think, therefore I am,
I walk, therefore I stand,
I sleep, therefore I dream;
I joke, therefore I meme."
-Squire Doodad
-
2021-09-30, 01:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Phantasmal Killer is a medium range death effect that is only visible to the target (I guess in comic the audience briefly saw through Yukyuk's eyes). It's also medium range, meaning that at Z's level the range is around 250 ft. That makes it a useful long-distance assassination spell since the risk of the caster being detected is fairly low. Even if the spell only has a ~20% chance of success it's not useless as a long-distance SoD option in certain circumstances.
Z might have intended to cast the spell at Roy or Belkar while they were engaged in gladiatorial combat, or perhaps at Haley from the other side of the arena while before the Linear Guild sprang their assault.
-
2021-09-30, 08:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2020
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
I feel like the answer to the question of "if v is so smart/powerful/yadda yadda why don't they just fly to xykon and nuke him from orbit" is "it isn't an entertaining story if the heroes are OP and can just blast the bad guy straight to hell in ten seconds".
Not saying that "OP = bad" because stories like One Punch Man pull off the idea of an invincible hero well, but stories aren't entertaining if the heroes win every battle because then what's the point of even getting invested when you know that nobody's gonna get seriously hurt/die? It kind of takes away tension.
I feel like you guys need to maybe take a look at the comic from a storytelling aspect instead of the game aspect. (Blasphemous, I know.)Shh! I'm hiding.
-
2021-09-30, 12:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
I agree with the first paragraph. The Doylist answers for many of these questions are pretty clear. But partly because the Doylist answers are so clear, I think that, when someone creates a forum thread asking, you know, 'why doesn't V cast more save-or-dies?' or whatever, they are generally looking for a Watsonian answer.
-
2021-09-30, 01:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- massachusetts
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Another thing to remember is that we see the ways V or other characters could improve as obvious because most of us have played dnd or similar games a lot. The Order are essentially newbies on their first long campaign.
-
2021-09-30, 09:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Location
- Magrathea
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
An explanation of why MitD being any larger than Huge is implausible.
See my extended signature here! May contain wit, candor, and somewhere from 52 to 8127 walruses.
Purple is humorous descriptions made up on the fly
Green is serious talk about hypothetical
Blue is irony and sarcasm
"I think, therefore I am,
I walk, therefore I stand,
I sleep, therefore I dream;
I joke, therefore I meme."
-Squire Doodad
-
2021-10-01, 01:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
V actually uses quite a few SoD spells. Disintegrate - arguably their signature spell - certainly is, and Prismatic Spray is a 4 out of 7 SoD that V casts in almost every combat - it just never works that way against anyone important.
In general, the spell selection by characters in OOTS is all over the place, including heroes, villains, and random third party characters. There's a massive bias towards what the author considers an exciting fantasy fight scene and fights his narrative purpose. This creates a conflict with the underlying system because fighting efficiently in high-level D&D is neither visually interesting nor does it lead to exciting fight scenes. One of the central problems is that HP inflation at high levels is so massive that unless damage output is incredibly optimized killing people with damage just isn't very effective. A back and forth exchange of blows with each side gaining and losing advantage due to various ploys/positioning/pluck represents both sides acting extremely sub-optimally. A 'great fight' like Roy v Thog is bad high-level 3.5 D&D play.
Essentially, in order to produce exciting fights the author has to make everyone bad at fighting according to the rules of their world. This is fine when played for laughs or used in meta-jokes as it consistently was during the first half of the strip, but fights now have the 'fate of the world' at stake literally every time the Order throws down and the fact that everyone is bumbling around makes things less compelling than they might otherwise be.
There is no good solution. 3.5 D&D is broken at high levels and produces broken worlds. Any Watsonian answer will always have gaping holes in it.
Now, the importance of this issue with the comic varies widely from one member of the audience to the next, but it definitely exists. The author is aware of it, has commented on it, and has even expressed that had he the chance to do it all again he wouldn't have bound the story to D&D 3.5.
-
2021-10-01, 01:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Disintegrate is a save or take a whole fistful of dice as damage spell. Sure, its damage is basically uncapped since it scales straight up to level 20, but save or dies kill you outright on a failed save.
-
2021-10-01, 08:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
I do not disagree with any of this. But it ignores the role of the DM to limit or modify broken mechanics, to build challenges that make the 'weaker' characters more important, and to moderate the story so that all players are allowed their moment to save the day. Sort of like the author is doing.
D&D is not a game of chess, nor even an Avalon Hill tactical simulator. It is a game of communal fantasy storytelling. If the rulebooks get in the way of the story, (per Gary Gygax,) then the rule is wrong.
-
2021-10-01, 10:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Roy Greenhilt is useless?
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society