Results 31 to 60 of 78
-
2018-10-24, 09:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2018
-
2018-10-24, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I'm sorry? What did I do?
-
2018-10-24, 03:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2018-10-25, 12:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Secret Lair on Sol c
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I've really tried making the class work, but no matter what I try, I suffer from either making the prc feel tacked on, or run into issues with illegality
-
2018-10-25, 02:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2018
-
2018-10-25, 02:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Okay! That was a tad shocking and confusing out of context (not knowing the lyric at all)
I was like, "what'd I ever do to get you all riled?"
-
2018-10-28, 11:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Build in. I can really only hope that there's enough competition for a meaningful HM.
Iron Chef Medals
SpoilerSir Driscoll Conia - Silver - IC L
Nick Snarespan - Gold - IC LIII
Lucy "Legs" Silvertail - Bronze - IC LXVIII
Bolfarg of Knoss - Gold - IC LXXVII
Ivarr Deathborn - Bronze - IC LXXVII
Ahmtel - Silver - IC LXXVIII
Tocke of Nessus - Gold - IC LXXIX
The Blessed Third - Silver - IC LXXXI
Galahad Galapagos - Gold - IC LXXXIV
Sai-don, Knight of the Tide - Bronze - IC LXXXIV
-
2018-11-03, 12:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I need two more days
-
2018-11-05, 12:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
In! Thanks for waiting everybody
-
2018-11-05, 09:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I love this PrC way too much but optimizing is not a skill of mine so I'll look forward to what others do.
Minister of sarcasm and pragmatism of the Grayview fanclub.
No, none of us were altering the unimutable laws of physics. That would be wrong.
-
2018-11-05, 10:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
-
2018-11-09, 10:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Let's get some entries coming in here! Many apologies for the delay.
Originally Posted by Master BarclayQuotebox
Avatar by Rain Dragon
Wish building characters for D&D 3.5 was simpler? Try HeroForge Anew! An Excel-based, highly automated character builder. v7.4 now out!
-
2018-11-09, 10:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
The great thing about being me is... there are so many mes!
Originally Posted by Maladrax SeDuplicusLast edited by Heliomance; 2018-11-09 at 10:22 AM.
Quotebox
Avatar by Rain Dragon
Wish building characters for D&D 3.5 was simpler? Try HeroForge Anew! An Excel-based, highly automated character builder. v7.4 now out!
-
2018-11-09, 10:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Inspiring Story Of A Young Girl Without Magic! ECL 15 Made Me Cry!
Originally Posted by Clio Q. BaetQuotebox
Avatar by Rain Dragon
Wish building characters for D&D 3.5 was simpler? Try HeroForge Anew! An Excel-based, highly automated character builder. v7.4 now out!
-
2018-11-09, 10:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
You all have the theme tune stuck in your head now
Originally Posted by (Doo-be-doo-be-doo) Inspector GadgetQuotebox
Avatar by Rain Dragon
Wish building characters for D&D 3.5 was simpler? Try HeroForge Anew! An Excel-based, highly automated character builder. v7.4 now out!
-
2018-11-09, 10:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Quotebox
Avatar by Rain Dragon
Wish building characters for D&D 3.5 was simpler? Try HeroForge Anew! An Excel-based, highly automated character builder. v7.4 now out!
-
2018-11-09, 11:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Lol. Not a single frikken gnome
-
2018-11-09, 12:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I really wish I’d had time for this one! I planned to use Shaper of Form’s ability to turn nonmagical items into other nonmagical items as a way of gaining obnoxious flexibility with gadgets (and arguably even recharging them, though I forget where I ended up when mulling the RAW on that one).
Looking forward to reviewing these in detail. Good job, chefs!In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
~ Gay all day, queer all year ~
-
2018-11-09, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I thought about doing a cleric dip with access to the dro domain and the craft domain to get the prereqs in a single level. I just didn't want to figure out how to get all of that on a human or gnome.
-
2018-11-09, 02:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I toyed with sneaky Whisper Gnome builds based around hiding and disappearing into the fog, but multiclass penalties stymied everything that felt worth bothering with.
I also thought about doing that. I found it deeply frustrating that Cleric didn't also meet the spellcasting prereq, and the regional requirement axed Southern Magician as well.
Iron Chef Medals
SpoilerSir Driscoll Conia - Silver - IC L
Nick Snarespan - Gold - IC LIII
Lucy "Legs" Silvertail - Bronze - IC LXVIII
Bolfarg of Knoss - Gold - IC LXXVII
Ivarr Deathborn - Bronze - IC LXXVII
Ahmtel - Silver - IC LXXVIII
Tocke of Nessus - Gold - IC LXXIX
The Blessed Third - Silver - IC LXXXI
Galahad Galapagos - Gold - IC LXXXIV
Sai-don, Knight of the Tide - Bronze - IC LXXXIV
-
2018-11-09, 04:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- A Frozen Coast
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
If I had time to cook for this, I would've used the Siege Weapon rules from Heroes of Battle to make more use of Profession Siege Engineer.
I also wanted to either use Eberron content (Warforged, Artificer) or Techsmith from Faerun's Faiths and Pantheons somehow. I just had no time.
-
2018-11-15, 08:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
ICO Spreadsheet has been updated with the dishes for this cook.
-
2018-11-20, 11:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Do we have any judges working on this one?
Iron Chef Medals
SpoilerSir Driscoll Conia - Silver - IC L
Nick Snarespan - Gold - IC LIII
Lucy "Legs" Silvertail - Bronze - IC LXVIII
Bolfarg of Knoss - Gold - IC LXXVII
Ivarr Deathborn - Bronze - IC LXXVII
Ahmtel - Silver - IC LXXVIII
Tocke of Nessus - Gold - IC LXXIX
The Blessed Third - Silver - IC LXXXI
Galahad Galapagos - Gold - IC LXXXIV
Sai-don, Knight of the Tide - Bronze - IC LXXXIV
-
2018-11-27, 08:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Cleveland, OH
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Yeah, I knew the holidays might throw a wrench into things. Only four entries, so you couldn't really ask for a lighter workload, judging-wise.
However... if there aren't any judges stepping forward, could we consider maybe borrowing daremetoidareyo's ranked choice voting from his Game Warper's Optimization Challenge?
Entry Alignment/Race Stub Judge: ??? Total Master Barclay (link) CG Lantan Human Expert 1/Wu Jen 4/Gnome Artificer 2/Wu Jen +1/Alchemist Savant 4/Gnome Artificer +8 - - Maladrax SeDuplicus (link) NE Lantan Human Ardent 2/Beguiler 1/Ardent +2/Lantanese Artificer 7/Ardent +3/Lantanese Artificer +3/Ardent +2 - - Clio Q. Baet (link) NG Lantan Karsite Cloistered Cleric 1/Forsaker 6/Martial Wizard 1/Gnome Artificer 10 - - Inspector Gadget (link) LG Lantan Human Mystic Fire Knight Paladin 6/Gnome Artificer 9/Effigy Master 5 - - Last edited by Darrin; 2018-11-28 at 06:56 PM.
Handbooks:
Shax's Indispensable Haversack, TWF OffHandbook
Builds:
Archon of Nine, Jellobomber, King of Pong, Lightning Thief
Spells:
Druidzilla, Healbot, Gish
Iron Chef:
-
2018-11-28, 09:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
That's fine by me, but I won't be able to finish it until I get through the e6 judging
-
2018-11-29, 01:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
It's time I gave back and judged a round. This will be my first time judging, and I will be shamelessly stealing the criteria used by OMG PONIES, with one edit. I'm not much for penalizing chefs for using the same entry method as other chefs. I will instead judge a build's entry for using interesting or distinctive classes or means of fulfilling prerequisites. It's more subjective and may get some disputes, but as a chef I was always frustrated when I didn't do as well because someone else had the same good idea. I probably won't have time to work on them until this weekend, but I'll try to have them finished before Monday.
EDIT: Forgot to mention I also don't care about multiclass penalties.
Spoiler: Criteria from Mr. PoniesAll builds will start with a base score of 12, representing 3 points in each category. Those category scores will change based on my answers to a series of questions, presented below. An answer of "Yes" will earn a +0.5 boost to that category, an answer of "No" will earn a -0.5 penalty to that category, while an ambivalent "Yes and no" will not change the score of that category at all. Thus, it is possible for a build to score anywhere between 1 and 5 points in each category. The questions are as follow:
Originality
1 Does the build present a compelling backstory or concept?
2Does the build enter the Secret Ingredient through a method unique from the sample character in the source as well as other entries in this round?Does the build enter the Secret Ingredient through interesting or distinctive classes, or use interesting or distinctive means to fulfill prerequisites?
3 Does the build make use of any interesting race, class, feats, or mechanical tricks that the judge hasn't seen in common use before?
4 Does the build avoid "known cheese" and overused optimization suggestions?
Power
1 Does the build utilize established power breakpoints and feat taxes for all classes and prestige classes taken?
2 Does the build function at the same power level throughout an entire adventuring day, rather than relying on "nova" powers?
3 Does the build thrive without requiring specific magic items, templates, or other "add-ons" to qualify for anything?
4 Does the build contribute significantly in terms of offense, defense, and utility?
Elegance
1 Does the build qualify for all classes taken outside the Secret Ingredient?
2 Does the build qualify for all feats taken?
3 Does the build avoid any rules errors, questionable rules interpretations, cross-setting material, or material specifically disallowed from this competition?
4 Does the build avoidmulti-class penalties andexcessive dipping (defined as taking 2 or fewer levels in 2 or more base/prestige classes)?
Use of the Secret Ingredient
1 Does the build qualify for the Secret Ingredient and make special use of entry requirements?
2 Does the build complete the Secret Ingredient or present a compelling reason why not doing so is actually a better use of the Secret Ingredient?
3 Does the build pair mechanical abilities of the Secret Ingredient with the rest of the build in unique ways (e.g. do something not every other entry can do)?
4 Does the build complement the concept of its chassis through use of the Secret Ingredient (i.e. does the entry feel like a Gnomish Artificer)?Last edited by The Viscount; 2018-12-03 at 08:01 PM.
Kolyarut Avatar by Potatocubed.
Awards
-
2018-11-29, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
You’re a class act, Mr. Viscount. Judging is hard, but it’s really rewarding. I guarantee you it’ll at least slightly alter how you make dishes in the future.
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
~ Gay all day, queer all year ~
-
2018-12-04, 07:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
Home sick today, which meant I had the time to finish judging this round.
In my judging the numbers 1-4 at the beginning of a passage indicate which question in my criteria I’m discussing. Number in bold at the end is the additions or subtractions. These will sound harsher than I really feel. I really did enjoy reading every entry and seeing the creativity brought to the table. It’s very possible that I missed some mechanical aspect of your build, don’t feel afraid to correct my mistakes. Please don’t take anything I say too hard, and if nothing else, know that you were smart enough to come up with a dish for this and I wasn’t. On that note, check my math.
I’m prepared for your disputes. Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth commence!
Master Barclay 17
SpoilerOriginality 3.5
1. Mixing Eberron with a Faerunian ingredient is a bold move. Lucky for you I like Eberron. I appreciate you weaving wu jen taboos into your backstory. The Mark of Making is certainly thematically in keeping with the ingredient. Mixing all these fields of magic works with the theme of alchemist savant. Works for me. [/B]+0.5[/B]
2. Wu jen is an unexpected entry, even if it is just “not wizard” but you’re not bending over backwards to make it work. Expert gets you the skills to get in, but I can’t say I’m excited about it. Call it a wash. +0
3. Launch item with spellvials may be cool, but it’s not new -0.5
4. No cheese here [/B]+0.5[/B]
Power 5
1. You left alchemist savant a level early, but it’s the only way to finish the SI. Feat choice gives you some good stuff with mark of making, and you’re helping me see your concept of throwing. You use your taxes in making all your items, and I can’t say that anyone can really use lightning reflexes. Take the points, but know I’d be happier if you crammed in Mad Alchemist. [/B]+0.5[/B]
2. As a wu jen you’ll run out of spells eventually, but you have the SI to back you up, and your build doesn’t call for you to spend your spells profligately. I’ll buy it. [/B]+0.5[/B]
3. The only items you discuss in detail are ones that you’re making, and this is a crafting SI so that works well. You wisely talked about a packmate as a potential add-on rather than a necessity. [/B]+0.5[/B]
4. The all-rounder category is always hard, especially in an ingredient like this that limits your options. You’ve certainly presented a reliable offense. Utility and defense are covered reasonably well in your wu jen spell choice. [/B]+0.5[/B]
Elegance 4
1. You wisely remembered to make your character Chaotic to appease Wu Jen (why a class that observes strict taboos can’t be lawful I’ll never know) and all other prereqs are met for alchemist savant. [/B]+0.5[/B]
2. You’re human, so that gets you mark of making. You’ve got the skills for dragonmark feats. [/B]+0.5[/B]
3. I know I said I liked Eberron, but not enough to ignore the fact that you’re qualifying by being from the Lantan region, which only exists in Faerun. You made a token gesture to explain it, but these are completely different settings. No dice. -0.5
4. Your dipping isn’t excessive so you get the points, but know I’m eyeing that expert level in a dissatisfied manner. +0.5
UotSI 4.5
1. You certainly qualify. You keep the skills up and use them to make your items. That certainly counts. +0.5
2. SI is indeed completed. +0.5
3. You mention launch item for your spellvials and the like, but your discussion of other powers is so broad it’s hard to see how it interacts meaningfully with the rest of your build. The wu jen spells you provided may cover utility, but few of them make good ingredients for spellvials to my eyes. I know as a wu jen you can always research more, but it’s so good at blasting, you could afford to showcase that more.+0
4. The puttering about with various schools, combining junk with alchemy, and mixing magic and devices feels like Gnomish Artificer to me. +0.5
Maladrax SeDuplicus 20
SpoilerOriginality 5
1. Ardent and Beguiler? I’m interested already. Brownie points for naming it Lantanese artificer in keeping with your human heritage and showing that you read the classes entry. Good eye for detail. Your mantles go together enough thematically that I can get what you’re doing conceptually without you having to justify it. I very much enjoyed your story, always nice to highlight the use of a class as niche as this one with a scenario that’s just right for them. I greatly appreciate the charts for your powers. It helps me see how things flow as you progress. I like the variations presented at the end for alternate ways to use the build. A good way to show off some other tricks as garnish without muddying your focus. Cool backstory, fun concept. Easily earns your points. +0.5
2. Fulfilling the prereqs with Beguiler isn’t just interesting, it’s damn clever. I’m only left a bit confused as to why you didn’t start with Beguiler for more skills. The only reason I could think of is because hidden talent has some weird wording that could be read to mean “unless you have psionic class levels when you take this, the manifester level is always 1.” Please let me know if I’m missing something else. +0.5
3. Jiggery-pokery with copies is something we’ve seen in Iron Chef, but exploiting the SI’s junk being counted as mundane to raid your own corpses is inspired. Magic mantle has been trotted out more than once for optimization, but you’re using it for some sane practical optimization. +0.5
4. The trick with fission and revivify is entering some territory faintly redolent of cheese, but it’s not a worn out combination. I’ll give you this one because you’re using it to further the build in a way that showcases the SI. +0.5
Power 5
1. No prestige classes besides the SI, just lots of ardent, and it clearly works. +0.5
2. You’ve got the PP to last several encounters, and you’re not going nuts with anything so you have good survivability. +0.5
3. The only things you talk about are stuff you make with the SI. +0.5
4. The SI provides you with offense and utility, and you have some of all three with ardent powers. You’re stretched a bit thin, but I’d say you’re covered, especially with all of your clones you have running about. +0.5
Elegance 5
1. Your base classes are ones without requirements, and you have no other prestige classes besides the SI. Simple. +0.5
2. All your feats are qualified for. +0.5
3. The closest you come to questionable rulings is the magic mantle for practiced spellcaster, but the wording of magic mantle is broad enough that it’s still safe. +0.5
4. No excessive dipping. That one level of beguiler isn’t the prettiest, but it’s pulling double duty qualifying you, so I’ll accept it. +0.5
UotSI 5
1. You certainly qualify for the SI, and you keep up with craft and DD after entering. Good enough for me, especially with how useless some of these prerequisite skills are. +0.5
2. SI completed, points given. +0.5
3. Cloning yourself and stealing your corpse’s devices is a trick that’s unique to you. +0.5
4. Gnome, or in this case Lantanese artificer, is all about thrift and scrounging, and making devices from nothing works with that. This build is definitely in keeping with the cavalier mad scientist attitude as well. There’s a lot you can do with many clones of yourself, but you keep it focused on making you a better Lantanese artificer rather than an ardent who also has gadgets.+0.5
Clio Q. Baet 18
SpoilerOriginality 4.5
1. An economically described concept, but it still comes through. Your build has a mish-mash of many ingredients, but it comes across as intentionally all over the place rather than sloppy. Your character is sampling all sorts of magic and schools of learning in her quest, and that comes through. A sort of gumbo rather than a garbage plate if you will. I love me some gumbo. Forsaker is quite an odd duck, and it’s one I like enough to have cooked with before. Funnily enough, I also used Karsite. You entered faster than I did, though, and I know just how hard that can be. Switching to Gnome Artificer’s magic out of necessity for a doomed loss of magic is a neat concept, and you pulled it off. I like the name. Always love a good pun name. +0.5
2. Using Forsaker to enter this class is certainly interesting, and it’s a decidedly uncommon class. +0.5
3. I think the last time I saw a Karsite was when I cooked one, and Forsaker is rare indeed. +0.5
4. Cloistered Cleric 1 is something of a mainstay of Iron Chef. It’s used for a reason, but it’s still not really fresh. +0
Power 4.75
1. You put Lightning Reflexes to use more than anyone else. That alone is worth full marks +0.5
2. Forsaker runs all day, and the SI doesn’t run out very fast. Works for me. +0.5
3. Karsite isn’t necessary to make everything in the build work, but it does help your Forsaker be better against magic. The only items you talk about are the ones you make. +0.5
4. Forsaker is a defensive beast, and the SI gives you some offense. It kind of gives you utility, but without the more magical items you’re missing out on some options. You do plug the hole of flight with feats, but utility is broader than that. You’re almost there, but
not quite. +0.25
Elegance 4
1. Your only other prestige class is Forsaker, and you qualify for that. +0.5
2. You qualify for all your feats, and you remembered to put your feats at the right levels based on HD. +0.5
3. With your citation of the sidebar, you have an acceptable reason why you can be a Karsite and still in this class. Taking a level of Wizard after Forsaker is incredibly strange, but it’s still legal. +0.5
4. The cloistered cleric 1 to start is a bit off-putting for me. The 1 level wizard dip as well is a bridge too far. -0.5
UotSI 4.75
1. You qualify for the SI, and you put skills to work, even investing a feat in trapmaking. +0.5
2. You complete the SI. +0.5
3. Making your own magic items to destroy to fuel forsaker and then salvaging the parts is a unique trick. +0.5
4. Forsaker may be strong defensively, but it’s also not particularly guiding about what you do. This means that you are a Gnomish Artificer kind of by default. You have a reasoning for why the character has to enter this class, but it doesn’t feel like being a Gnomish Artificer is an actualization of her journey. +0.25
Inspector Gadget 16.5
SpoilerOriginality 5
1. Homage builds are always a gamble, as they rely on your judge’s familiarity or attitudes with the work. I didn’t watch the cartoon (though I have somehow seen both films), but I’m familiar enough to know that this is a cool way to re-fluff the class’s features. +0.5
2. Mystic Fire Paladin is entering the hard way, but that’s dedication to the concept. It’s certainly distinctive. +0.5
3. I’m giving you this one for dedication to the concept by managing to add in Penny, Brain, and even Chief Quimby. Well done. +0.5
4. Nothing cheesy about this one. Nice and sane. +0.5
Power 4
1. You finished Effigy Master. Paladin 6 is right before your dead levels, so it makes sense to leave then. +0.5
2. You’ve got devices for all day, but your limited paladin spells and smites mean you’re likely to use them up before the day is done. -0.5
3. You don’t discuss using anything that you don’t make as part of the class. +0.5
4. You’ve got some offensive coverage from the SI, and some defensive from paladin and gadgets. Effigy Master fills out enough gaps for me to call you well-rounded. +0.5
Elegance 3.5
1. You qualify for effigy master, your only other prestige class. +0.5
2. Mentor requires 8 ranks in 2 of the skills from your category. You have 8 ranks in craft (metalworking) but not the other skills at level 6 when you take mentor. I don’t see how you’re taking 2 feats at level 6 either. -0.5
3. You didn’t finish filling out your skills in your chart. It may not matter for prerequisites, but it’s poor form. I know we’re all busy, but if I’ve got the time to read this entry, you have the time to finish filling it out. +0
4. There are no dips in your build. +0.5
UotSI 4
1. You qualify for the SI, and you keep up with some of its skills. +0.5
2. You didn’t finish the SI, and you didn’t talk about why. Effigy master sort of has a capstone, and I might have been swayed if you explained how much better it is than the last level of the SI. But here we are. -0.5
3. You contextualized your abilities as specific powers of Inspector Gadget, and I appreciate the time you took to point them out to me. I’ll take that. +0.5
4. Gnomish Artificer is clearly at the center of your build, and it’s where you get most of your power from. +0.5Kolyarut Avatar by Potatocubed.
Awards
-
2018-12-04, 07:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
No disputes
-
2018-12-04, 08:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Cleveland, OH
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimisation Challenge in the Playground XCV
I am also home sick. Found another typo. No disputes.
Handbooks:
Shax's Indispensable Haversack, TWF OffHandbook
Builds:
Archon of Nine, Jellobomber, King of Pong, Lightning Thief
Spells:
Druidzilla, Healbot, Gish
Iron Chef: