Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
-
2013-06-19, 02:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Austin Tx
[PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
Spell Feats
So, here's a thought experiment. If anyone thinks it has potential I might expand it and make it the basis of a setting.
(Note: This assumes mage classes will involve getting these feats rather then spell slots)
I think the easiest way to go about it might be to make each feat grant a once per day use of a given spell as written. The feat's prerequisites limit the level at which it can be taken.
Example:
Lighting Bolt
Prerequisite: Int 13, Spell Craft rank 5
Components: Verbal chanting, somatic gestures, and a small glass rod rapped in animal fur which is destroyed through casting.
Benefit: Once per day, as a standard action, you release a powerful stroke of electrical energy that deals 1d6 points of electricity damage per rank in Spell Craft (maximum 10d6) to each creature within a 120 ft. line. The bolt begins at your fingertips.
Creatures within the area of effect who make a successful Reflex save take half damage.
The lightning bolt sets fire to combustibles and damages objects in its path. It can melt metals with a low melting point, such as lead, gold, copper, silver, or bronze. If the damage caused to an interposing barrier shatters or breaks through it, the bolt may continue beyond the barrier if the spell's range permits; otherwise, it stops at the barrier just as any other spell effect does.
The more difficult and painfully time consuming method is to convert each spell into a skill roll allowed by the feat.
Example:
Lighting Bolt
Prerequisite: Int 13, Spell Craft rank 5
Components: A small glass rod and piece of animal fur (destroyed by casting).
Benefit: As a full-round action, make a DC 21 Knowledge (Arcana) check to correctly recite the incantation and a DC 18 Perform (Dance) check to correctly execute the ritual motions.
If both checks are successful, release an electric bolt from your fingertips that deals 1d6 points of electricity damage per rank in Spell Craft (maximum 10d6) to each creature within a 120 ft. line.
Creatures within the area of effect who make a successful Reflex save take no damage.
The lightning bolt sets fire to combustibles and damages objects in its path. It can melt metals with a low melting point, such as lead, gold, copper, silver, or bronze. If the damage caused to an interposing barrier shatters or breaks through it, the bolt may continue beyond the barrier if the spell's range permits; otherwise, it stops at the barrier just as any other spell effect does.
You can use this ability a number of times per day equal to 2 + your constitution modifier.Last edited by DoomHat; 2013-06-19 at 02:56 AM.
...with a vengeance!
-
2013-06-19, 03:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
Seems like too much work for not enough gain.
Sure, what if spells were feats? So what?
How would this change substantially improve the game? What new builds, strategies, and ways of having fun does it offer? What problem with the existing game does it fix?I spent an hour on the edge of dreams,
I walked between the worlds,
and when I woke I never knew
to which side I had fallen
-
2013-06-19, 03:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Vancouver BC Canada
- Gender
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
I actually really like this, but I agree it needs to be expanded upon.
First off, I do like Spellcraft in terms of how it contextually fits, but this is going to most effectively be used on non-casters and Spellcraft is trained only.
Second, I should point out how little a skillpoint is valued in comparison to a level in a caster, and that your dmg die/ranks only works for pathfinder.
Third, this system needs to be open-ended, as in, the spell should probably go something like "X type of spells from Y spell list of Zth level or lower", that way you don't need to make a feat for every spell, it just needs to be vague enough to carry the spell's general theme.Last edited by Hanuman; 2013-06-19 at 03:43 AM.
-
2013-06-19, 04:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Austin Tx
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
I started thinking about this after asking myself, "What if the sorcerer got the same design treatment as the fighter?".
That being: [Get one class feature at first level and every even level there after from a pool of options available to any class.]
I find it weird that casters get so many more tools then everyone else per level, in addition to a monopoly on all the most powerful and interesting ones.
This is my effort to open up the caster toy box and make them share, like the filthy wealth distributing communist I am.
Changing that value is part of the idea.
I really like and greatly prefer how PF handles skills over standard 3rd ed, so that's the model I'm rolling with.
Also all you need to be trained in a skill is have a point in it. It doesn't have to be a Class Skill, but the +3 helps.
If I understand you right, you're suggesting something like; "Once per day, cast any Xth lvl or lower Divination spell."?
Not sure what to think of that idea. Seem kinda potent, but not all that broken considering the narrowed scope. Hmmmmmm...Last edited by DoomHat; 2013-06-19 at 04:40 AM.
...with a vengeance!
-
2013-06-19, 08:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Vancouver BC Canada
- Gender
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
If you're the same guy who did the chewy skill checks homebrew then I like your work and your "inventive" approach, I think I still have a campaign that used a rough draft of those skillcheck rules in it's on-paper homebrew. (Quite an honor considering how seldom I bother to put rules on-paper, and for how much homebrew I go through.)
Fighters get plenty of options and action economy utility, as long as they are disciplined in the use of stances, maneuvers, boosts and strikes, if you catch my drift
I prefer 3.P for any campaign I run, P being core ruleset and 3.5/P being source. You do need to note that you are using it for the scaling model though or else 3.5 will get a free +3D6 damage on scaling >.>
Ah sorry I forgot @ trained, was pretty tuckered out when I wrote that.
I agree, it's a pretty good model for it, though in terms of how effects scale it's harsh but fair.
To the effect of limiting it, yes.
What you want to do is make this a more contextualized form of Anyspell, you want to have it at least 2 spellslots lower than what a wizard can cast, you want it to be any spell, but limiting the spell's choice options puts it more in line with a feat rather than a class ability in terms of power and utility.
I was originally thinking Wu Jen style of fuzzy rules around descriptors, where you can use any "fire descriptor" spell, which can include but is not limited to any spells with "fire" in the title or that state they are a "fire" spell.
That way you could have any "sonic" based spell, and you can use it as if it were a skill-slot, filling it with any sonic spell as if it were a spell-like effect, and in addition counting as if you had learned the spell.
This would allow the sorcerer to get an extra spell slot 2 levels lower than their maximum and act as if they know that spell, adding to their utility both in that one usage and optionally more with their spells per day.
This has interesting ramifications when you consider it doesn't have to be arcane, allowing a single spell to become available to a class who normally couldn't learn it, and to be able to change that spell every time they rest, or perhaps every time they level up they may change it, depending on what's more balanced/fun.
-
2013-06-19, 08:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- Teddy Bear Junction
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
You might find this to be of some use: http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=67.0
"Bender knows love, and love doesn't share itself with the world. Love is suspicious, love is needy. Love is fearful, love is greedy. My friends, there is no great love without great jealousy!"- Bender Bending Rodriguez
-
2013-06-19, 09:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
I like the idea; it'd probably work best, though, with a variant where everyone gets a lot of feats and no classes (with class features also turned into feats), and then they can pick their feats to customize a class.
-
2013-06-20, 12:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Austin Tx
-
2013-06-20, 01:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
LOOK AT ALL OF MY WEAPONS! LOOK AT THEM!
-
2013-06-20, 05:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: [PF] What If Spells Were Feats?
If I had a dollar for every thread that link has been posted in, I could buy Rich Burlew a new server.
We need that stickied somewhere.