Results 811 to 840 of 862
-
2021-10-01, 07:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Well, that was an example XD in my country car vandalism is not a crime punished with prison. But the gates are far more important than cars.
Comic 1189:
Serini was watching, and listening, the paladins. And they were talking about their allies coming, and about plans to find the gate and that, i think that is enough reason for Serini to act, if not, they would joined forces with the order and then Serini's work would have been far more difficult, an ambush vs a team of 9...Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2021-10-01 at 07:05 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 07:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2021-10-01, 07:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I can't think, off hand, of any kind of action that one can do "freely" to another without condemnation; I always expect there to be limitations.
Let me preemptively point out that D&D characters have fantasy biology; for example they don't suffer potential side effects from being "tranquilized" that are a large part of why we put a lot of limitations on analogous methods for subduing people in real life.
If you think doing what Serini did is ok, is there anything you can do to a person other than murder and torture that you think is evil?
I must admit, I am a bit surprised we are arguing about whether doing all those things is evil. I could understand it if we were arguing that Serini is justified, but acting as if people should be able to do those sorts of things freely is surprising to me.
I'm still optimistically presuming that you don't believe these things are Always Evil, and that your actual position is the milder one that you deny the claim Serini is justifiable in taking them. And so I will continue to object to argument forms like "these acts were Evil thus Serini shouldn't be doing them".
If you truly believe they're Always Evil... I don't think we can come to any sort of agreement.
In terms of past bad actions - if the person you saw on your street was a convicted sex offender, that would not be justification for you or the police to imprison them.
I think there are even real world examples of your specific example; limitations on where a convicted sex offender can go. Whether you consider the laws justifiable, I really don't have an opinion.
Indeed, much like the situation in the comic. The Order, having been attacked, now would be justified in firing back.
Hmm, I think we may be talking past one another and misunderstanding each other here. The message I intended to convey in my parenthetical was the same one as I think you conveyed above.
I agree. Except the Paladins weren't in Serini's house. I don't think you can reasonably claim the whole of Monster Hollow is Serini's house such that anyone who steps foot there is trespassing, especially when there's a whole village of other creatures there.Last edited by Hurkyl; 2021-10-01 at 07:13 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 07:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I don't know. She may be in a country, or she may be in unclaimed territory.
@Vikenlugaid, you brought up what is allowed in your country, do you have any thoughts?
Ah, fair enough. What are the constraints of preventative detention that you mentioned, so we can see if they are comparable to this situation?
Comic 1189:
Serini was watching, and listening, the paladins. And they were talking about their allies coming, and about plans to find the gate and that, i think that is enough reason for Serini to act, if not, they would joined forces with the order and then Serini's work would have been far more difficult, an ambush vs a team of 9...
That strip does not suggest they were "obviously planning to" go to the gate. It is all entirely consistent with them just watching.
In your car analogy if the car vandal said "Our friends should be here soon. Hey I wonder what car that have in there. We can't look or the guard would see us" that would not be grounds to attack them, drug them, imprison them etc etc.
Well the only description of sleeping poison I could find (below) does suggest some side effects - weakness, lassitude and something only described as "subsequent detrimental effects". Also the darts themselves are a risk of killing a person in DnD (although not the paladins).
But what's the point here? Are you saying that you can do what you want to people so long as it doesn't do any permanent of long term harm?
Are we in a position where can agree that doing the things Serini did to the Paladins would be wrong, unless she was justified for some reason? We can then discuss what i think is our real point of disagreement - whether that justification exists.
I can't think, off hand, of any kind of action that one can do to another for which there aren't circumstances that would make it Evil.
Who's doing that? I, in turn, are a bit surprised we are arguing about whether doing these things is Always Evil.
I'm still optimistically presuming that you don't believe these things are Always Evil, and that your actual position is the milder one that you deny the claim Serini is justifiable in taking them. And so I will continue to object to argument forms like "these acts were Evil thus Serini shouldn't be doing them".
If you truly believe they're Always Evil... I don't think we can come to any sort of agreement.
You sure? There are a number of real world examples of this type of thing; for example, this is pretty much exactly what a "restraining order" is meant for.
I think there are even real world examples of your specific example; limitations on where a convicted sex offender can go. Whether you consider the laws justifiable, I really don't have an opinion.
Are we agreed that, in the absence of specific things like restraining orders applying, you cannot drug and manacle a sex offender who is on the street near your house?
Agree. Even if we assume for the sake of argument that Serini is completely and incontrovertibly in the right here... that doesn't imply the Order would be in the wrong to resist.
I do strongly suspect a large part of how this argument has gone is mainly of the form that you've made statements far more broadly than you intended, and I'm failing to convey I'm objecting to the broad statement rather than the more narrow one you intended.
To be clear, my example was meant to refute claimed principles like "duly appointed officers cannot imprison people on suspicion either" and similar. I don't consider that statement to be a valid premise to be used in argument, and attempt to refute that by demonstrating a situation where that premise would lead to a false conclusion.Last edited by Liquor Box; 2021-10-01 at 07:48 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 08:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
As far as I know, Serini is currently in Xykonlandia.
In Xykonlandia, it is illegal for Serini to NOT imprison paladins.
Letting them go after stuffing them full of amnesia potions, on the other hand, is civil disobedience.
// Im clearly not taking this seriously, but I can’t take seriously the idea that the moral implications of Serini’s actions should be evaluated in the legal framework of whatever country most recently planted a flag near the North Pole.Last edited by Dion; 2021-10-01 at 08:58 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 09:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
And in the real world, I think the side effects are things like respiratory damage, cardiac arrest, or death.
But what's the point here?Last edited by Hurkyl; 2021-10-01 at 09:18 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 09:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
1- I am not a lawyer. But any situation where the arrested could be dangerous if he is free, even if he is only a suspect and not yet declared guilty. And from Serini point of view, both the Paladins and the Order are pretty dangerous for gates.
2- Ochul literally say that they are waiting for the allies to start de action, if Serini knows that they are waiting for more people to come, is enough reason to act before they come, couse if not they will be probably too strong to attack them and all will be ****ed up.
Forget the car analogy and think about a terrorist analogy, which is, in fact, more similar to these gate-destroyers.
And you need to know that Serini is nor omnipotent, she can afford the luxury of just wait while her enemies join forces and look what they do then, she need to act when she can stop them, the risk is to high.
Btw, reading that comic I remembered that Ochul thoght killing Ona would have been nice... Is Ochul evil then? Couse killing is an evil act... Or maybe the same act could be evil or not evil depending on the situation? Well well. And we are talking about killing here, far worse than atrack with non lethal force.
Seriously, what does Serini need to do here to be not evil? Just help the gate-destroyers without any condition?Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2021-10-01 at 10:01 AM.
-
2021-10-01, 10:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
That dishonest statement (italics mine) can get only one response: WACOS.
Given that I've had SERE training, I learned how to deal with the situation you describe. We got to experience all kinds of sanctions for not answering questions. Not sure if you've had the opportunity: it's good training.
Spoiler: not gonna go any further into RLAnd I am glad that I didn't have to apply that training to what it was preparing us for.
Last edited by KorvinStarmast; 2021-10-01 at 10:11 AM.
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-10-01, 11:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
If I was breaking and entering (as the order are), I wouldn't be happy about being on the wrong end of it, but I'd understand it and would consider moving past it and getting along with whomever did it.
Doing nothing would be neutral, IMO.
She is doing other things that are good I think, like setting up the defences
Assuming typical D&D dungeon, these are lethal and indiscriminate. Her active defense is clearly non-lethal. While her judgement is in question, I think we can agree that she would avoid hurting a bugbear child, whereas a purple worm would just eat them.
A more accurate depiction of this as the trolley problem would be:
- Serini flips the lever (attacks the paladins/order), a handful of people are drugged and imprisoned and either Xykon rules the world or the world is destroyed
- Serini does nothing and either Xykon rules the world or the world is destroyed or the Order stops Xykon and the world survives.
My country imprisons people if they come within a few hundred meters of a nuclear weapon.
But more to the point, how does Serini knows that the paladins were "obviously planning on" going into the factory. For all she knew they were just watching Xykon.
Yes, they might have conceivably snuck into the factory to look around and then leave without touching anything, but that's not the case. O-Chul (by his own words) is there to do "whatever it takes" to stop Xyklon.
Now, there is (potentially) an absence of evidence that Serini had sufficient evidence to be justified in this belief ahead of time. The reason for this absence of evidence is that this is a stick figure comic that can't afford that level of detail.The thing is the Azurites don't use a single color; they use a single hue. The use light blue, dark blue, black, white, glossy blue, off-white with a bluish tint. They sky's the limit, as long as it's blue.
-
2021-10-01, 12:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2021-10-01, 02:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
The issue is that Liquor Box's description provides detail in a selective and unfair manner.
The "no flip" side includes the Order saving the world, so it also needs to include the Order messing up.Last edited by Quizatzhaderac; 2021-10-01 at 04:21 PM.
The thing is the Azurites don't use a single color; they use a single hue. The use light blue, dark blue, black, white, glossy blue, off-white with a bluish tint. They sky's the limit, as long as it's blue.
-
2021-10-01, 06:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
OK< well if we don't have the specifics we cannot compare.
2- Ochul literally say that they are waiting for the allies to start de action, if Serini knows that they are waiting for more people to come, is enough reason to act before they come, couse if not they will be probably too strong to attack them and all will be ****ed up.
And you need to know that Serini is nor omnipotent, she can afford the luxury of just wait while her enemies join forces and look what they do then, she need to act when she can stop them, the risk is to high.
Am I missing something? If there is something that suggests they are "obviously planning to" go inside, perhaps you could quote it.
Btw, reading that comic I remembered that Ochul thoght killing Ona would have been nice... Is Ochul evil then? Couse killing is an evil act... Or maybe the same act could be evil or not evil depending on the situation? Well well. And we are talking about killing here, far worse than atrack with non lethal force.[/quote]
Yes, it could be evil or not depending on the situation. It is not evil when someone is attacking you with lethal force. It is evil when someone is simply lingering around your town.
Seriously, what does Serini need to do here to be not evil? Just help the gate-destroyers without any condition?
I think that drugging someone is an aggravating factor. To be extremely clear, I think a person should not interfere with another person (and drugging is one example of where Serini did that) without justification.
I could understand if you were arguing that Serini was justified by the circumstances (like most people seem to be). But I am having trouble understanding how you can tenably argue that the act of drugging someone without their consent is ok on the face of it.
More SERE training than O-Chul?
The conversation was about the paladins. They are not breaking and entering.
Arguably the Order are different because they have actually entered the cave.
You've omitted the outcome "Order destroys the final gate"
My country imprisons people if they come within a few hundred meters of a nuclear weapon.
It might be true that your country has areas where nuclear are stockpiled, that are clearly demarked and fenced, and people are challenged on entry and warned not to proceed. If someone then penetrates those defences somehow, they can be arrested.
That might be analogous to what the Order did, but it is not similar to what the paladins have done.
The "street" is the subarctic world. The "factory" is the north pole. Going to the north pole is an extraordinary activity for Azurite paladins!
Yes, they might have conceivably snuck into the factory to look around and then leave without touching anything, but that's not the case. O-Chul (by his own words) is there to do "whatever it takes" to stop Xyklon.
Now, there is (potentially) an absence of evidence that Serini had sufficient evidence to be justified in this belief ahead of time. The reason for this absence of evidence is that this is a stick figure comic that can't afford that level of detail.
I don't agree that the stick figure comic medium restricts the ability to convey the information. All that had to happen was to have O-Chul say "we have to get inside before Xykon does" instead of "let's not try any doors because Xykon might see us" before Serini captured them.
No, the possibility of the gate being destroyed was included on the side if she doesn't interfere. I will paste it again and bold it so you can see:
A more accurate depiction of this as the trolley problem would be:
- Serini flips the lever (attacks the paladins/order), a handful of people are drugged and imprisoned and either Xykon rules the world or the world is destroyed
- Serini does nothing and either Xykon rules the world or the world is destroyed or the Order stops Xykon and the world survives.
In the first scenario the world would be destroyed by Xykon, or in conflict with future adventurers. In the second scenario it would be destroyed in the conflict between the Order and Xykon. You could add that level of detail in if you want, but it doesn't change the outcomes out of each scenario.Last edited by Liquor Box; 2021-10-01 at 07:18 PM.
-
2021-10-01, 09:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-10-01, 10:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-10-02, 04:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I'm not. I'm saying "capture + drugging" is not different from "capture" in any way that would cause us to judge the act more harshly. It doesn't matter whether she was justified or not.
If Serini is justified in capturing the paladins, I don't see how adding in the fact her method was sleeping poison would be cause to condemn her.
If Serini is not justified in capturing the paladins and we condemn her for that, I don't see how adding in the fact her method was sleeping poison would mean we should increase our condemnation.
Honestly in both cases, the fact sleeping poison was the method would seem to soften the act, since it seems one of the least harmful means available, so the act was not as bad as the "average" capture. Like "Serini is an awful person for capturing the Paladins, but I can at least praise that she chose a gentle method of capture".
To pre-empt a possible response, let me add that I'm categorizing "she should have tried peacefully asking them to come along quietly before attacking" as a condemnation of "capture", so we're talking past each other if, this whole time, the only reason you were saying "drugging" is because you mean she should have done that first and you would have had absolutely no problem* should sleeping poison be her next step if they said "no". I don't think that argument holds any water, but I wanted to acknowledge how I fit that argument in the big picture.
*: with her choice of methods, specifically, I meanLast edited by Hurkyl; 2021-10-02 at 04:44 AM.
-
2021-10-02, 07:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
You are right, unless someone surrenders, kidnapping/capturing someone does imply doing something unpleasant to them. If we exclude them surrendering (which they were unlikely to do) drugging is probably somewhere near the lower end of that spectrum. It is harmful in and of itself, but less harmful than many other ways they could go about it.
Is your point here that think that I am separating out the drugging, the imprisonment, the mocking and hitting, and the roofies to play up what Serini did? Similar to using the confronting term 'kidnapping' rather than a softer term like 'capturing'. In both cases you were right. I feel justified in doing that because it seems to me that several people are downplaying the significance of what she did, and of course because the things I am saying are accurate. I don't think there's any question that what she did is seriously wrong, unless she had sufficient justification. There is a question as to whether she was justified, and I'd be happy to discuss that.
-
2021-10-02, 07:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- A Shallow Grave
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
You're treating this as though its not a fantasy story. Its ok to kill and steal and break and enter, etc in DND. In fact its usually encouraged. I love considering the actions and morality of the people in the story too, but you can't compare this world to that one. In that one it is arguable that there is no such thing as murder, and that sometimes killing people is a wonderful thing. Just ask Uncle Kandro.
-
2021-10-02, 11:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
You are always "forgeting" that Serini knows that Ochul and the Order are, at the very least, partially guilty of the destruction of 3 gates. She is not Elan, she doesn't need 200 foot tall flaming letters saying "these guys are bad news to your gate". Ans she can't wait for them to join forces and wait to see what they do then, couse she is not that powerful to stop them all together.
And btw, talking to Lien ans Ochul is not an option, we have alreasy seen that conversation, she won't believe them. And once she speak and lose the surprise factor, capturing them is far more difficult. That is not a good act, that is a stupid act.
And doing nothing is not good either, is negligent, her job is defend he gate.Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2021-10-02 at 11:43 AM.
-
2021-10-02, 11:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I can't say the Order or the paladins were truly responsible for Soon's Gate falling at all. I'd also say that destroying Girard's Gate was still the right call, but I don't think I'd be able to convince you anyways.
Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-10-02, 11:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
You don't need to convince me, you need to convince, at least, the gods, Serini, V and Blackwing, who all think destroying a gate is not the right call. In fact, if Roy could ttavel in time, he would stopped himself of doing it, you know, the gods almost destroyed the world for that "right call".
In fact, Xykon might have been killed for good there by the Vector legion and their armies, who knows, or the other way, that would have been good to the world, and epic to de story XD
And with soon's gate, thats why I said "at least partially guilty" but still, Ochuls intentions were clear there.Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2021-10-02 at 11:52 AM.
-
2021-10-02, 11:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-10-02, 11:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
What evidence do you have that the gods care one way or the other about the gates?
If they really cared about the gates, they’d probably mention to someone not to destroy them. They seem to have the ability to do that, but they didn’t bother. So, the logical inference is that they don’t care.
And that matches up pretty well with what we’ve seen. They’re planning to make another world after this one fails, just like they’ve done a few billion other times. Heck, half of them are looking forward to it.Last edited by Dion; 2021-10-02 at 11:57 AM.
-
2021-10-02, 12:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
The paladins are guilty of "attempted gate destruction".
But I want to emphasize there is a gap between "they deserve punishment* for destroying the gate" and "they should not be trusted with another gate".
We can look at each little thing the paladins have done and say they made reasonable choices every step of the way... but the end result is still a destroyed gate. I think there's a big picture/little picture disconnect here; I interpret Serini's position that she's looking at several "forests of gate destruction" and no matter how much we argue the paladins were planting the right trees will change that fact, and she's not trusting them to plant another forest in her territory.
*: or some other form of recompense; exactly what doesn't matter.
-
2021-10-02, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
-
2021-10-02, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
-
2021-10-02, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
-
2021-10-02, 12:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
You know what, I think the "Serini was scrying on the paladins at just the right moment" thing is right. And she just assumed that if they did it once, they'd do it again without looking into it more.
Roy had no way of knowing that Tarquin would have destroyed the Gate - and if Tarqun hadn't destroyed it fast enough, Xykon would have gotten it anyways. It's not like there were any defenses to speak of left, after all.Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-10-02, 05:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
What? Who cares what Tarquin really wanted?
Roy did know that Tarquin was there and Xykon was coming, and both wanted the gate. That would ended in a Tarquin VS Xykon, and that is good news for the world, at least for the good guys of the world, one of them will loose, and that is one big bad guy less in the world. And then, who knows, maybe the other one was weak enough for an easy win to the Order.
And still, if Nale + Malack + Zzdtri didn't notice the double bluff of the gate, why should Xykon + Redcloak? They have far less experience adventuring, Redcloak is smart but I don't think Malack is an idiot.
But this is irrelevant now. Even if destroying Girards gate was the right call, Serini isn't suposed to know that circunstances, she only know that the gate was destroyed, and that's not nice.
The thing is some people is saying that Serini's actions are evil + irrational just because she is not helping the protagonist. And from her point of view, doing this is the most rational thing to do, and she is still caring about the life of these guys, when that should be secondary given the circunstances (and being this DnD where dying is not the same than the real world), so she is really really good.
God, she is even called "mom" by a typical evil monster who is, in fact, totally good, I mean, that goodness needs to come from the one who raised it.Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2021-10-02 at 05:30 PM.
-
2021-10-02, 05:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Team Nale barely glance at the bluff before Nale freaks out over his apparent failure and rushes the party out. No investigation, no search, just one cast of detection magic each and they're gone. Maybe Z could have advised further investigation, but surely Malack has no interest in playing the role of advisor here.
Furthermore, IIRC the whole thing was speculative on Nale's part anyways; they were just hoping the OotS was going to lead them to something worthwhile.
Team Evil, on the other hand, actually has the gate coordinates and the OotS is rather certain of that fact: Girard's illusion confirms Serini knows them, and the OotS knows Xykon is getting gate info from her diary.Last edited by Hurkyl; 2021-10-02 at 05:56 PM.
-
2021-10-02, 06:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender