View Single Post

Thread: Why must necromancy be disgusting?

  1. - Top - End - #7
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Marillion's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2009

    Default Re: Why must necromancy be disgusting?

    Quote Originally Posted by druid91 View Post
    Why must nearly every undead creature worth using as more than a mook absolutely disgusting?
    Emphasis mine. An undead creature is not alive; the necromancer has given them enough life-energy to cruelly force the remains of the deceased creature (which may have been lying in the ground rotting away for years) into a mocking semblance of life, enough to make it capable of movement, but not enough to stave off or reverse the decomposition process. Why should he invest such power in the creature? It cannot feel, nor did he raise it for its delightful company - he raised it for one specific purpose, a purpose that does not require a pleasant countenance.

    It isn't muscle, blood, and bone that's animating the creature; it's magic. And magic is a valuable resource to be invested wisely in one's creations.

    EDIT:
    Quote Originally Posted by druid91 View Post
    I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the freakish things with six arms three legs and no apparent head....

    That sort of thing.

    Simple shabby zombies isn't what I mean.
    Many of my points still stand. The necromancer who created this thing didn't create it for its charming personality; he created it to kill things. If it doesn't need a head to do that, why give it one?
    Last edited by Marillion; 2011-01-27 at 08:43 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Xefas View Post
    I like my women like I like my coffee; 10 feet tall, incomprehensible to the human psyche, and capable of ending life as a triviality.