![Quote](images/sand/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
douglas
We should assume Rich did fudge the rules when:
A) two thirds believe that rules fudging is the correct explanation
We should assume Rich might have fudged the rules when:
A) one third believe that rules fudging is the correct explanation, or
B) one half believe that rules fudging is a reasonable, though not necessarily correct, explanation
It might be worthwhile to maintain a running total (with list to ensure no double-counting) of votes in a spoiler block to improve consistency and persistence of such judgments.
Explicit statements from Rich trump any such vote, of course.