Quote Originally Posted by SinsI View Post
His alignment modifications, based on gladiatorial episodes:
Neutral: Played a bully with criminals.
Evil act, but for Good reasons ("Anything that makes the prison experience more miserable should serve to reduce crime")

Good: Had second thoughts on "Hey, am I really allowed to kill that guy?"
Good: Sent a dinosaur to save two helpless partners

Overall, his behaviour in the Arena brought him closer to Good than to Evil.
I'd say his arena experience brought him closer to good, sure, because his treatment of the prisoners was par for the course but he treaded new ground there. Anyway, a serial killer who likes to torture his victims doing one good action does not an alignment shift make.

Further, having second thoughts on killing a person isn't a good action any more than deciding not to kill your neighbors pet rotwiler for no reason. It isn't good not to kill someone, it just isn't evil. The definition of neutral. And no, every action an evil character makes isn't evil. In fact, the vast majority of actions anyone makes are neutral. Eating soup? Neutral. Putting on pants? Neutral. Not killing the guy who brings you your soup and pants? Neutral.