Nice trick. A net also works.
Indeed, I don't really see the point of using harrowed spellstrike with a spell that's already ranged.It also says "any touch or RANGED Spell" for its Harrowed spellstrike.
Although, I just place that under poor editing.
This is definitely a fun combo. However, I see it as more of a niche build (ki battery + a party with other ki users) than as something for a broad class guide. I'd say that in general, a Magus benefits more from four extra levels in Magus than from a combo that gives more arcana points than he really needs.
Indeed. Even without that ruling, it's still a very nice pick. That goes on the list of spells.
This feels like something that many GMs would ban. I'm not a fan of writing a handbook based on ambiguous rules.
Yes, Snowball is a great spell, regardless of your archetype. That one also goes on the list.For another option on ranged touch attack spells for the likes of the Card Caster and the Myrmidarch, I would look at Snowball
Well, if one build can afford to spend three feats on TWF/ITWF/GTWF, then the other can afford to spend three feats on Natural Spell Combat; and if conserving spell slots is the goal, then a spellstrike build does that better than a build that spends spell slots on conjuring a dagger.
I completely agree that a multiattacking natural weapon Magus is a great combo (that should go in the builds list later); but I'm don't see how Spellblade really adds to that. A bunch of natural attacks plus spellstrike still strikes me as more effective than a bunch of natural attacks plus a conjured dagger. For example, try stacking multiattacks with Frostbite, or with one of the Eldritch Scion's "do nasty stuff on a crit" bloodlines...