Quote Originally Posted by Emanick View Post
Eh, good point. I was thinking that the emphasis was on the fact that they could see it in the jungle, rather than seeing it at all. But I could easily be wrong.

Can someone check for me? I sent my copy to a friend for her birthday.
Like the "Published Canon" part of Section 1a in the original post says, they "never expected to see one of these in this part of the world". Which I suppose does mean the emphasis is on it being seen there, rather than being seen at all....

But "of course they're surprised to see a virus, it's a virus" seemed less convoluted than trying to root comedy on "Kish indicates 'ducks', and ducks quack, and a quack might misdiagnose something as a virus"