Which is another way of saying this scenario could never exist.
Which, I mean: that's obvious, but it's kinda neat stumbling over an actual proof for it.
It does match. Computability means being able to calculate an arbitrary digit of the decimal expansion. We can do this for numbers like sqrt(2), pi, e, and other constructed transcendentals. There are numbers we can't do this for, and a lot of them involve elements of randomness.I don't agree, because even an arbitrarily precise approximation isn't the actual number. Getting the exact irrational number would require infinite time, which I think doesn't match the definition of "computable".