Quote Originally Posted by lio45 View Post
So, Crusher, no, no way there'd be 9 things to vote on... maybe 1 or 2, tops.
You do know that there were nine things to vote on in the last voting session, right? I'm not sure if Crusher made that statement with that in mind; but his claim, and the criticism of your proposed method, isn't without merit. Your proposed system seems like it provides fewer options, makes it more difficult to actually bring anything to a vote to implement changes, and has a harder time accomodating the nuance of what people actually want. I won't pretend the current system isn't without faults, but it's hard to see how your proposal fixes any of its imperfections.