Quote Originally Posted by Aspheric View Post
You do know that there were nine things to vote on in the last voting session, right? I'm not sure if Crusher made that statement with that in mind; but his claim, and the criticism of your proposed method, isn't without merit. Your proposed system seems like it provides fewer options, makes it more difficult to actually bring anything to a vote to implement changes, and has a harder time accomodating the nuance of what people actually want. I won't pretend the current system isn't without faults, but it's hard to see how your proposal fixes any of its imperfections.
What exactly is being discussed? I'm completely lost but I feel like voting for whatever of the however many rules we're voting on individually is the most reasonable (to quote O-Chul and all that).