This is incredibly vague. I have not read the book, but I did look at the reviews, and there were a lot of people who didn't interpret it that way, so I would be careful about claiming your interpretation as the one final truth.
Him being a bad writer has nothing to do with him being a bad person.and ever since he took the lead the stories been kinda falling apart.
From what I read online the book didn't meantion any ages, so they could have been 13, they could also have been 15, which is legal age several places in Europe.Also, 13 year olds should not be having sex with adults. It is not slander to call them children, because they are.
I never said they should, I said they're not children. When you use the word children you are making people who read your comment think the book is something different than it actually is.