Originally Posted by
Kane0
That is how they play though, so ‘partial caster’ is a potentially valid description by which others may use the synonymous ‘one-third caster’ even if the actual spellcasting ability is not present or identical.
If warlocks didnt have pact magic, only cantrips and invocations could they still be considered spellcasters? I would argue yes.
But throwing out the caster idea there are still no choices available to a 4E monk that doesnt demand Ki expenditure, which is a problem.
And anecdotally still a very restrictive number of disciplines available to you at any given time.