Well, this is certainly an interesting vote. As I mentioned earlier, I think I have come to see the size rule as problematic and so would like to see it removed/reworked. However, I remain a supporter of the FBS list until a better proposal for its replacement comes along. While there are issues with people wanting their proposals in the list, removing the list with no replacement would be unhelpful (when I first found the list I made it about 3 entries into 3e before giving up). I‘m not a huge fan of replacing it with Crusher‘s list (or a similar entity). What I or others think the MitD could be can easily stray from what is actually likely (just look at my vote).

Thus, my vote will be the following. A > C > Z > B

Also, new thread, yay! Wonder how long it’ll be until the MitD actually rears it’s ever-changing head.