Quote Originally Posted by Peelee View Post
Because at that point, she was 50% of the Order on attendance and nobody could override her. That's how groups work, the group decides. Belkar couldn't contest it against the group available, so Belkar would have gotten kicked.

And, again, Belkar would have a lower threshold for being booted than Durkon. Which is different than Durkon having more mercy than Belkar - it means Durkon has more leeway than Belkar. That leeway means he does not deserve to get kicked for things Belkar would deserve to get kicked for. That's how it works.
I think it might depend on how you are using the word deserve.

For instance Individual A breaks into Individual B's house tonight and kills Individual B while they sleep.
Individual A presumedly* deserves to face legal punishment for this, regardless of who they are or what they have done in the past.

Under that use of deserve it doesn't matter the Durkon is in good standing if** he deserves to be kicked out of the party for this action then he deserves to be kicked out of the party for this action.

*there are scenarios where they might not
**I don't think he does.