Originally Posted by
Segev
The difficulty with Team Jersey approaches to objective ethics and morality is that applying it arbitrarily manufactures MORE "muddy" situations, rather than clarifying the few that already exist. If it's "always good" to kill vampires (because they're always evil), then a vampire that is not hurting anybody, only drinks animal blood (or only takes blood donations from those who voluntarily give/trade it, without causing permanent harm to the donors), and is a good father-figure to his adopted family and possibly the noble protector of his town from a lantern archon-led bandit force that pillages and rapes (but is still doing good because they're following a lantern archon, and following archons is always good!)... that's incoherent to our definitions of "good" and "evil" in general.