Quote Originally Posted by AvatarVecna View Post
If we're talking the strongest version of Superman vs Homelander then yeah it's not even worth discussing. Homelander is a middling powerhouse who happens to be impressive by mortal standards, sure. But Superman is strong enough to punch the universe into retconning, fast enough to escape the gravitational pull of a black hole, and tough enough to take a nuke to the face without much problem even in some of his weaker incarnations.

...but if we're talking "more powerful than a locomotive, faster than a speeding bullet, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound" Superman, that's probably more of a fair fight? And sure that's probably not what OP meant, but also Superman has lost battles on occasion when by all accounts he shouldn't have even been inconvenienced.
It's almost as if the authors have no grasp of physics:)

Mentioning tanking a nuke isn't actually worth mentioning at all after the black hole Stunt. The forces he endured there are so many orders of magnitude beyond, in comparison tanking a nuke is as meaningless as tanking a snowball thrown by a toddlet