In what way are his issues over Lucas's mistreatment of him not burning bridges?
The accusations are entirely against not-Prowse, and paint Prowse in the better light. I am (and, for years, have been) entirely in Prowse's corner in this.
No, they wouldn't. It was differently contracted, gross vs net, full stop. They would not hesitate to screw over anyone who negotiated for net (which, I should point out, is still wrong, and arguably even more wrong).
Prowse had well over 40 acting credits before Star Wars, let alone Return of the Jedi six years later. Further, Prowse was acting throughout the trilogy - discounting body acting (or voice acting, which is another hot-button issue of mine) as "not acting" is a gross disservice to such actors.