Useful Morality Subsystems (Alignment Replacements)

[Segev]

So far, all I am getting from this is, "It is a terrible system because we say so. It is not useful because words for things are not necessary. We do not like it and thus nobody can have actual use for it." Maybe there is more to the rebuttals than that, but if so, I am having a hard time seeing them.

This would not bother me except that this was the same kind of circular echo chamber that seemed to me to be responsible for 4e and the failure thereof. The notions were not inherently bad, but were very "for their own sake" and had a scoffing sense that anything that pointed out flawed premises was to be disregarded or dismissed as "powergamers" or "ignorance" or "sacred cows."