Originally Posted by
Talakeal
You are the one who brought up destroying societies, which is, imo, more or less synonymous with genocide.
Using violence as a means of forcing social change is, in any realistic setting, going to have a lot of collateral damage, at which point it is really a tossup over whether the world is now a "better place".
My objection is not to changing the world, its to the idea that violence can solve all of your problems and doesn't just beget more violence in the long run.