Originally Posted by
moonfly7
Well, it is always AvatarVecna time.
Originally Posted by
Saint-Just
Well, that's just lazy. It's AvatarVecna time then.
(Ok, I'll make a normal vote, I promise. Later. Maybe. Probably).
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Slow start to the game... gac3 for a wagon that's not the narrator.
Originally Posted by
flame12
I feel like I might look suspicious throwing my vote back at gac3, but I agree with your reasoning, so doing it anyways.
Originally Posted by
Taffimai
I agree that the right time to lynch the narrator is when the game hasn't ended after flipping three wolves or six villagers, but we need a second wagon that isn't Gac (and I think Flame is new?) so I'll try Supagoof to see how that takes off.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Also why do you think there are three wolves?
Originally Posted by
Taffimai
I don't, I was talking about the edge cases where I'd want to lynch the narrator. I don't think there are four wolves, so if we lynch three and the game doesn't end, something's up. Similarly, I don't think there are less than two (although technically a serial killer game would be possible, but in my experience you very rarely win 1 v 9 anyway so that wouldn't be very challenging), therefore if we see six people flip as villagers without lynching a single wolf (which would mean 2 v 2 left) and the game still hasn't ended, I'd be more inclined to suspect AV than that there'd be only a single wolf.
So in short, the correct AvatarVecna time is Day 4.
Originally Posted by
moonfly7
I'll change my vote to an actual when I feel like there's someone good to vote for. Other least halfway decent.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Saying this unprompted makes me think they feel like they’re under pressure to produce content and look like they’re doing things.
- Moonfly joke-votes AV
- Saint-Just joke-votes AV, quantifies they’ll make a proper vote later (maybe)
- You state that you’d rather have a non-narrator wagon
- Flame agrees that he’d rather have a non-narrator wagon
- I agree that I’d rather have a non-narrator wagon
- You ask me to elaborate
- I go into detail about when I’d want to lynch the narrator
- Moonfly quantifies they’ll make a proper vote later
- You call Moonfly’s statement “unprompted”, even though it was much less so than Saint-Just’s
Now, I have to concede that your instincts were correct, but it’s still inconsistent. You have to forgive me, I’ve spent the past several irl days actively looking at the interactions between you and Saint-Just for signs of a wolf-duo and it’s still not completely out of my system.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Also it took me a while to realise that you’re talking about specifically “lynch the narrator” with Moonfly and Saint-Just’s (incidentally, can I call you SJ? I think the hyphen makes me want to abbreviate your name.) guesses for the bastard mechanic.
I don’t think that’s particularly AI given the narrator is, well, AV.
Originally Posted by
gac3
Hmm... According to the vote count I'm in the lead. That's fine. But there is also two other wagons near me and flame came in so why not move to one of those. AV
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
...why are you voting for the narrator over the actual player?
Like. Do you actually think that lynching the narrator is a pro-town move? And if so... why?
Originally Posted by
gac3
I mean... It only puts us at a tie but I'm more curious about trying to lynch the narrator to see what happens out of curiosity than lynching someone who seems to only be a wagon so that I wouldn't be the only one.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
What will happen if we lynch AV is that we'll get some snarky flavour text and no information that gets us any closer to killing wolves tomorrow. And do bear in mind that if there are three wolves tomorrow is MyLo. (Hopefully there aren't, but we have to consider it.) oh right, not killing anyone means there's nine alive day two so it's 6-3.
- You tell Gac that voting AV is NAI
- Gac votes AV
- You tell Gac that voting AV is not pro-town
- Gac explains he is curious what happens if he votes AV
- Voting AV is now even more anti-town
The inconsistency here is that in every argument, your estimation of the inherent towniness of voting AV changes, rather than that you address the differing circumstances. It comes across as “voting AV is fine, except when
you do it”.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Lynching you or Supagoof will at least give us useful information even if you flip town.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Caoimhin... yeah, that's a bad situation. But it's not any better than your alternative. If Moonfly flips town we at least learn that I was wrong about stuff and can re-evaluate going into MyLo day three. If Supagoof/BW flips town we only learn that the person playing the same way they do every game was town.
Basically we're screwed unless we kill a wolf tomorrow, so we should vote the people who are most likely to be wolves.
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Caoimhin, what does a Supagoof town flip tell us?
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
Also CaoimhinTheCape because they just reminded me I haven’t voted yet and I want to see where it goes.
Originally Posted by
Taffimai
Why did you not vote Moonfly, which would've cleared Caoimhin and me both?
Originally Posted by
Snowblaze
I don't vote people because of who they'll clear if they flip town, I vote people because I think they're wolves. I was more convinced on moonfly than Caoimhin night one but that changed towards being more suspicious of Caoimhin. Also quite a few people were suspicious of them earlier today so I wanted to see if the wagon would gain momentum.
- You mention a preference for a particular lynch because it also gives info on a town flip
- You twice try to convince Caoimhin to vote based on the town flip providing more info
- You vote someone “just to see where it goes”
- I question you for not voting the way that would’ve yielded the most information, even on a town flip
- You claim not to vote based on the info that a town flip could give
Basically you reject my reasoning even though it’s essentially the same as what you’ve used yourself before.