Quote Originally Posted by Kane0 View Post
The very fact that it was caught, raised and pushed on is itself noteworthy, even if its only a footnote in the history.
I can agree with that. And we have more pushback yet. I could see the "you agree not to sue" clause in 6f attracting some ire.

Quote Originally Posted by Unoriginal View Post
No they don't.

There is no right and no legal basis to control anyone or anything referencing a company or even a person by name.

Making claim about said company or person? Sure, there are legal basis.

But referencing or mentioning? Nothing.
They're not just idly referring to them though, they're actively using their license. I can see that being too close to tacit approval for WotC. You're always free to release your content without it.

I'm going to be very amused if/when ORC includes a similar clause.