Seems like a dubious take.

It's especially odd when you have to start by blaming the teenage girl for not ending institutionalised slavery singlehanded while at school, and then you have to assume the author is lying when she says the character returned to the matter later in life when she could actually achieve meaningful change. It's very easy to be a critic when you can make random assumptions and then when the creator contradicts them you can assume they are lying. That's great, because it means there are no conditions where you might have to think you might be wrong.

House elves as an institution are not portrayed positively in the books. Harry is universally disturbed by the compulsion to punish themselves and goes out of his way to free Dobby from an abusive master. But Rowling is mature enough to realise that making a fundamental difference is a long term game.

It's a weird thing with fantasy authors, if there is a social issue that isn't resolved by the end of the text readers tend to assume that the author approves of it. There is no reason to think that, it's a more mature take than trying to downplay massive societal issues by giving them easy answers and wrapping them up by the end of the story, thereby downplaying how difficult it is to actually resolve said issues.

It's the epitome of that quote about making assumptions that don't fit the text and then complaining when they are not met.

Anyway, I Youtubed a couple of hours of the game, so far it seems okay but nothing special. Voice acting not great, lead is generic, vaguely interested in the plot now, not sure If I will get it or not as of yet. Seems kind of like rings of power, where the conversation about it is so loud that the only way to get a fair perspective is to get the damned thing. Still don't know, though.