Quote Originally Posted by Theodoxus View Post
Can we at least agree to the fact that there is no RAW stance on the interaction between TW and WoF? Both are agnostic to the other when it comes to direct opposition. And thus any decision as to their interaction is purely a ruling, which can be debated on the merits, but not using an appeal to authority vis a vis RAW.
I support this.
Quote Originally Posted by Theodoxus View Post
Much like the original question, there is nothing stated in the rules as to what happens when CS is used on BB. Inferences can be made, and whatever might end up being decided at a specific table might be debated, but there's no authority to appeal to in that case either. Best case scenarios and reasoned explanations for why you'd make the call you would are as far as this discussion can go.
I'm less on board here. I think that DMs are welcome to rule as they see fit, but I don't find support in the RAW for the idea that a counter spelled BB still results in an attack.