New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Break's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    For those who aren't aware, the Throne of Dominion is a lair item in Adventurer's Vault 2, and is previewed on WotC's site. It's quite powerful.

    What you have is a stun item that works without an attack roll (thought it is a save ends effect), with range limited only by sight, and with loose conditions with which you can apply that stunning. I'm not even sure if the following cheese works by RAW, partially because of how poorly worded the item is, but I'll present it here, if only for the amusing mental image it would provide.

    Have a ritualist cast Tenser's Floating Disk, and place the throne on it - weight shouldn't be an issue if your Arcana check is high enough. A 40+ result lets the disk carry a literal ton of items, which should be sufficient; however, since not many can consistently manage an Arcana check that high, a 25+ for 1000 pounds of lift should do the trick.

    Have someone else - that is, not the ritualist - sit on the throne. This "king" will basically yell out silly or nonsensical orders for the enemy to disobey, thus opening the way for a stun. The ritualist, meanwhile, pretty much acts as a rickshaw driver for the king.

    So, you've got a 100% accurate stun with absurd range at your disposal - the last step is to duck as your DM throws his books at you.

    Where this gets truly terrible is that you can use this on the rest of the party, too. Give your orders, stun them if they disobey, give them a quick punishment that preferably doesn't involve leaving your throne, and repeat until they comply. Now duck under the game table as the players throw books at you.

    The above isn't foolproof - among other things, the king has to leave the throne sometime, and it basically only works on enemies the king is aware of. There's also the problems of no action or area of effect the stun has, so you don't know exactly when or how many you can stun at once for disobeying, so some ranged attackers might still be able to get at the king. Also, the king can't really control the party in dangerous situations, as stunning them for disobeying would be too dangerous.

    Past that, though, the above was mostly using the most amusing interpretation of the throne's abilities - after all, the thought of some wizard carting around a bossy gnome on a throne is just too funny to pass up. Here's to hoping the item is worded better in the final release, or errata'd to make its limitations clearer.
    Join the IRC channel or else.

    Quote Originally Posted by AstralFire View Post
    You do not [play Pun-Pun]. You do not.

    Pun-Pun is purely a thought exercise, made to go "haha, look at this series of poorly finished but easily properly understood rules which can be abused for the purpose of laughter." It is the D&D equivalent of being endowed like a tribal fertility statue, or 90's Madonna outfits - scary, striking, suggestive, and completely nonfunctional.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Unlike most magic items, lair items aren’t portable; they must be left behind when a hero goes exploring.
    The basic idea of these items is that you can't move them. You build that thing in throne hall and it will remain there forever.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2006

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Yes, but it doesn't specifically say it ceases functioning if moved, needs to be bolted to the floor, or anything else. He mentions that you need to eventually leave the throne, which isn't strictly true either if you can have your meals brought to you and the resulting wastes taken away.

    Going by the exact wording of the item, you can effectively permastun any being who disobeys you, in deed or even thought. If you say "Don't move, or even think about moving", and they do either, they're stunned. Technically, they're stuck there for the rest of their lives unless you give them a different order - if they don't move, they don't move, and if they do (or even think about it), they won't be moving anyhow.

    The worst part is that upon reading the item description, even without reading the rest of the post, all of this was painfully obvious. It's like they made no attempt to proofread or test these items. I can only hope the section introduction for lair items says something along the lines of "these items do not function outside of the building they are designated for" or somesuch, because elsewise this item is insane.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Messenger View Post
    I really would rather Tarquin finally just went all George R. R. Martin on Nale.
    That's right - George R. R. Martin; a writer so ruthless, his name is a verb akin to Samuel L. Jackson. Valar morghulis.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    The only thing worse than the usual irrelevant rules pedantry is incorrect irrelevant rules pedantry.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2007

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Quote Originally Posted by FlawedParadigm View Post
    The worst part is that upon reading the item description, even without reading the rest of the post, all of this was painfully obvious. It's like they made no attempt to proofread or test these items.
    Yes, it's almost as if Wizards of the Coast have realised D&D players actually love arguing about nonsense like this, and have resigned themselves to providing item descriptions that make the design intent clear whilst leaving the abusability to DM fiat. That way we can enjoy a diversionary social activity (arguing about rules), indulgent DMs can allow their players lulzy rules interpretations, and everyone else can get on with playing the game as intended after laughing at amusing, obviously absurd alternate interpretations.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    KIDS's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    It's the new Candle of Invocation, in a strange fashion.

    Imo, since it's the only of its kind so far and comes so late, I can't say that it worries me. I'll just ignore it, or if one of my players wants it, houserule it to something more reasonable. But they should have done a much better job on that, particularly playtesting.
    There is no good and evil. There is only more and less.
    - Khorn'Tal
    -----------------------------------------
    Kalar Eshanti

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kurald Galain's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    This abuse is easily countered with an invisible or hidden enemy, or one that has blindness or darkness powers. Just sayin'.
    Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.

    "I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
    Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The cyberpunk present
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Quote Originally Posted by Antacid View Post
    Yes, it's almost as if Wizards of the Coast have realised D&D players actually love arguing about nonsense like this, and have resigned themselves to providing item descriptions that make the design intent clear whilst leaving the abusability to DM fiat. That way we can enjoy a diversionary social activity (arguing about rules), indulgent DMs can allow their players lulzy rules interpretations, and everyone else can get on with playing the game as intended after laughing at amusing, obviously absurd alternate interpretations.
    That makes a scary amount of sense.
    Truth resists simplicity.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2006

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Actually, where the real fun will come in is when the players start trying to abuse this, and then the DM hits them back, especially since bad guys tend to have ways of forcing you to confront them in their lairs. Especially fun since it's very difficult to teleport people large distances against their will the way you could in some earlier editions.

    Orcus on his throne, indeed.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Messenger View Post
    I really would rather Tarquin finally just went all George R. R. Martin on Nale.
    That's right - George R. R. Martin; a writer so ruthless, his name is a verb akin to Samuel L. Jackson. Valar morghulis.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    The only thing worse than the usual irrelevant rules pedantry is incorrect irrelevant rules pedantry.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [4E] Throne of Dominion Abuse

    Or if the enemies don't speak the players language, or are deaf, or are smart enough to twist the meaning of commands so they obey them and still do what they want... Also, the ritualist that cast the floating disk can ride the throne and still control the disk, he doesn't need to chauffeur.
    "I am bleeding, making me the victor!" - Wimp Lo, 'Kung Pow'
    "Nonsense! I would never do such a thing unless you were already having been going to do that!" - Professor Hubert Farnsworth A, 'Futurama'

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •