Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: Commoners + Chickens
-
2009-09-10, 10:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Commoners + Chickens
So I've come acroos posts mentionng something about commoners with chickens. Could someone tell me what thats about?
Thanks:-)Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
-Groucho Marx
not nale, not-nale. thog help nale nail not-nale, not nale. and thog knot not-nale while nale nail not-nale. nale, not not-nale, now nail not-nale by leaving not-nale, not nale, in jail.
I support LGBT In the playground.
-
2009-09-10, 10:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
Re: Commoners + Chickens
There was an article posted (either online or in a dragon magazine, i disremember which) about flaws for commoners.
One of these flaws was "chicken infested" which iirc made it so any time you reached for ANYTHING you had a chance to just pull out a chicken instead.
I could be wrong on the effect, but that's the jist of it.
~R~
-
2009-09-10, 10:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- You know Bosco?!
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Chicken-Infested Flaw. Commoners only. 50% chance of grabbing a chicken out of a bag or pouch when you would try to draw something out of it. Combine with spell component pouch, whose DnD physics say you can pull an infinite number of things out of it, all as free actions, and it never happens to run out.
"So Marbles, why do they call you Marbles?"
-
2009-09-10, 10:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Yeah, the Chicken Infested flaw, which is commoner only, gives you a 50% chance to pull out a live chicken instead of the item you wanted whenever you try to draw anything. Spell component pouches have infinite contents and drawing something from one is a free action. Combine the flaw and a component pouch, and...
"Courage is the complement of fear. A fearless man cannot be courageous. He is also a fool." -- Robert Heinlein
-
2009-09-10, 10:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Foster Farms profit?
EIDT: Or do you mean the drunken master / master throwers fighting with chickens as improvised weapons?Last edited by ericgrau; 2009-09-10 at 10:20 PM.
So you never have to interrupt a game to look up a rule again:
My 3.5e Rules Cheat Sheets: Normal, With Consolidated Skill System
TOGC's 3.5e Spell/etc Cards: rpgnow / drivethru rpg
Utilities: Magic Item Shop Generator (Req. MS Excel), Balanced Low Magic Item System
Printable Cardstock Dungeon Tiles and other terrain stuff (100 MB)
-
2009-09-10, 10:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Wow, that's hilarious, I'm totally going do use that next time my group gets together to play D&D.
;-)Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
-Groucho Marx
not nale, not-nale. thog help nale nail not-nale, not nale. and thog knot not-nale while nale nail not-nale. nale, not not-nale, now nail not-nale by leaving not-nale, not nale, in jail.
I support LGBT In the playground.
-
2009-09-10, 10:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Its the sort of ability that should be an epic feat, not a commoner flaw.
-
2009-09-10, 10:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
-
2009-09-10, 10:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Caught in a Mosh!
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
-
2009-09-10, 11:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Charlottesville
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Tali avatar by the talented Thormag.
-
2009-09-10, 11:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Elemental Plane of Paper
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Nope, because that rule relies upon a DM's common sense, and a DM that allows this probably doesn't have any.
Rogue Handbook | Warmage Rebuild | Diablo's Assassin | Revised Classes
Potpourri Creation Contest II Winner: Desert Martial Adept Substitution Levels
Potpourri Creation Contest III Best Characterization: Edward the Sly's Lucky Spells
Prestige Class Contest XXI Submission: Child of the Seelie Court
-
2009-09-10, 11:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2009-09-10, 11:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Eat them, for example.
-
2009-09-10, 11:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Best combine with levels in Warlock for The Dead Walk invocation and the Corpsecrafter + Destructive Retribution feat. You'll be able to summon a huge supply of temporary chicken zombie fodder, each with like, 1/2 a HD which'll explode for a small amount of negative energy each. Stack up enough undead chickens, and you'll have negative energy splattered all over the place.
Bawk bawk bawk BOOM!!!!!
-
2009-09-10, 11:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Reserves of Strength + Chickens + Greater Consumptive Field = Profit
-
2009-09-11, 12:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Charlottesville
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
Tali avatar by the talented Thormag.
-
2009-09-11, 08:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
I bet you could make a pretty cool campaign based on a BBEG who has a level of commoner and this flaw. Even better if you combine it with El Pollo Diablo.
The party finally makes it into the deepest chamber in the hen house shaped dungeon where they stand face to face with the big devil chicken who rules from his flaming chicken nest deep in Baator and he can pull out mad pecking legions from his spell pouches to drown his enemies in a furious flurry of feathers, fire and a lot of bawk.Awesome avatar by RustMonster
Constipated Lizard Slayer
-
2009-09-11, 08:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- The Final Chapter
- Gender
Re: Commoners + Chickens
That's the basic core assumption of every crazy build, from the Hulking Hurler to Pun-Pun. "If your DM was a moron, you could get away with this..." Every game-breaking, rule-lawyerist, munchkinized, twinked-out, CharOped, RAW-cooked build depends utterly on a DM that fails to comprehend or implement Rule #0 properly. All a DM has to do is say, "LOL, no. Now let's just play the game," & any insane build is shut down, but good.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. I just think that it bears repeating.