New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Last Edit: Sept. 11, 12:52 PM

    Terrible Pun

    Evocation [Mind-Affecting][Language-Dependent][Sonic]
    Level: Brd 3, Sor/Wiz 3
    Components: V
    Casting Time: 1 standard action
    Range: Close range [25 ft + 5 ft/2 caster levels]
    Area: Radius-Burst, spherical, centered on self
    Duration: Instantaneous
    Saving Throw: Will Negates/partial
    Spell Resistance: No

    You speak a pun so terrible that any creature within the area suffers from the pain of hearing said pun. All other creatures within the area takes a 1d4 intelligence penalty that lasts for 1 hour per caster level. In addition, creatures in the radius take 1d4 points of sonic damage per caster level, up to a maximum of 5d4. A successful save negates the intelligence damage and halves the sonic damage.

    Creatures with an intelligence score of 6 or lower are not affected by this spell. Creatures that cannot hear are unaffected by this spell.
    Last edited by Trobby; 2009-09-12 at 08:27 PM.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Aug 2008

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    OP. You have an area spell that deals ability damage in addition to normal damage at level 2. A ray of enfeeblement is considered a good spell and it is considerably weaker that thin.

    Also: It should probably be enchantment. Making this evocation makes no sense.
    Last edited by Frog Dragon; 2009-09-11 at 09:13 AM.
    Frog in the playground.

    My homebrewer's extended signature.

    I have Str 5!

    Quote Originally Posted by BobVosh View Post
    Wall of text attacks! CRITS!

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    DOOMBOT9000's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Howza bout a will save, to avoid having to stop whatever they're doing and just glare angrily at the caster for round?
    01100011 01101000 01100101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101100 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101001 01100111 01101110 01100001 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101

    Inside every omnicidal robot-paladin, there's a pixie trying to get out.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Will Negates? Actually, that does make sense...and I suppose I could make this a Bardic level 3 spell. I just figured they'd have an easier time making puns than Wizards and Sorcerrors.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Ray of enfeeblement is a 1st level spell. Of course it will be weaker than terrible pun.

    Since terrible pun is limited to affecting creatures of Int of 6 and higher, no animals can be harmed by this spell. PETA approves it.

    However, you neglect to mention whether deaf creatures are affected. More importantly, this spell is more powerful than sound burst, so it probably be a level higher. Terrible pun is both mind affecting and sonic.

    Debby
    Last edited by Debihuman; 2009-09-11 at 09:38 AM. Reason: getting links to work properly yay!
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Godskook's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Quote Originally Posted by Frog Dragon View Post
    Also: It should probably be enchantment. Making this evocation makes no sense.
    Evocation > Enchantment

    1.Enchantment spells(at least the SRD ones) almost all have durations(every one I checked did). This spell doesn't.

    2.Enchantment is not the only mind-affecting school, but it is(again, SRD) a school without any direct damage spells.

    3.This spell is reminiscent of shout, which is already Evocation.

    4.It also reminds me of this spell.

    If anything, the mind-affecting part needs to go, based on #4, but I like it as Evocation, although placing it in Divination and adjusting it to be more in line with the terrible secret spell wouldn't be bad either.
    Avatar by Assassin89
    I started my first campaign around a campfire, having pancakes. They were blueberry.
    My homebrew(updated 6/17):

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
     
    DracoDei's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Near Atlanta,GA USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    I concur bards should get it at a lower spell level.

    Enchantment sounds best, as you are magnifying the power of bad humor in their minds to the point where it makes their ears bleed or something.
    [Public Service Announcement]P.E.A.C.H stands for Please Examine And Critique Honestly[/Public Service Announcement]
    Currently Running: Equestria Begins (A High Tactics campaign)
    Extended Signature
    My Homebrew is meant to be used, but, if you do, PLEASE tell me how it goes.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    DOOMBOT9000's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    I like the idea of it being a Bardic spell more than anything, puns are right up their alley. It also makes sense to me that the radius be dependent on your ranks in perform.
    01100011 01101000 01100101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101100 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101001 01100111 01101110 01100001 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101

    Inside every omnicidal robot-paladin, there's a pixie trying to get out.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Troll in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGirl

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    This actually needs the [language-dependent] and [sonic] descriptors. Lack of humour doesn't translate well.

    I guess evocation could make sense if you are manipulating the raw essence of bad humour, but I'd suggest sticking with Enchantment.

    Also, this spell should allow spell resistance - the magic is clearly affecting its victims directly.
    Last edited by lesser_minion; 2009-09-11 at 09:49 AM.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    The spell is, at its essence, based on the idea of "Shout". Heck, originally it was going to have the [Sonic] Descriptor, but the actual damaging force behind the spell is the brain-crushing stupidity of it, not the force of the words.

    [language-dependent] I agree with, and I think, since everyone seems to have a problem with the int damage being too powerful *save Debi*, I'll bring that down to a 1d4 instead. But in turn, I'm also taking it back to Bard 2.

    And I think Evocation is probably a better school. Even if it is mind-affecting, the crux of the spell is a force that damages the opponent's mind.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Troll in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGirl

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    A temporary penalty to intelligence - similar to Ray of Enfeeblement - would probably be an improvement on actual int damage.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    ...But it already reads "temporary damage". Isn't that the same thing?
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Whooops, you edited your spell before I finished writing. In any case this was my thought:

    I think requiring terrible pun to be language-dependent is a very good idea. It's already limited to creatures of Int 6 or more so requiring that the opponent be able to hear the pun and understand it makes sense. Of course, this limits which creatures can be attacked by the pun. However, those that are affected take a lot of damage.

    However, it should be a a 3rd level bard spell. It fits well between sound burst and shout. It's more useful than sculpt sound which is 3rd level. Of course, you could limit this spell to bards only if you wanted.

    Debby
    Last edited by Debihuman; 2009-09-11 at 11:01 AM.
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    I can see why it should be a 3rd level spell for a Bard, but to keep it reasonably useful, I think I'll have to keep it at 3 across the board.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    The Neoclassic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northeast USA
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Quote Originally Posted by Introbulus View Post
    A successful save negates the intelligence damage and halves the damage.
    You probably want this to be "halves the sonic damage."

    Anyway, I like the idea. Quite amusing. I think the difficulty for picking the school here arises from the different effects. Evocation fits perfectly- for the sonic damage aspect. However, the Intelligence damage would be far better suited to enchantment. For example, we see that feeblemind (which lowers a creature's Int and Cha scores each to 1) is enchantment. So, I'm rather torn, not really convinced that evocation is a "better" option here. So is the trouble of spells with interesting effects!

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Well since sculpt sound at 3rd level is limted to bards only, I was thinking that this spell would make an good alternative to that. In my [not-so humble] opinion, there simply needs to be more bard-only spells.

    Just my take on it.

    Debby
    Last edited by Debihuman; 2009-09-11 at 11:26 AM.
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Troll in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGirl

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bristol, UK

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Quote Originally Posted by Introbulus View Post
    ...But it already reads "temporary damage". Isn't that the same thing?
    Not really. A temporary penalty to a stat would stipulate that it cannot cause the stat to drop below 1, and have a stated duration.

    Ability damage is specifically the stuff that recovers at the rate of one point per day.

    I think that if the pun really needs brain bleach badly enough to justify intelligence damage, it would probably justify a higher-level spell simply from the fluff power level.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Good point. Alright, I'll make it a duration effect.

    I do find the idea of "More Bard-only spells" interesting...what do the rest of you think? Should it just be a Bard 3 spell?
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    One more thing: I'd change the range to Close [25 ft. + 5 ft./2 caster levels].
    and the Area should be 10-ft radius spread. You don't want to accidently be caught in your own spell!

    Debby
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Ah, but the idea of the radius spell is that everyone who can hear you will be affected. I wouldn't want it to extend TOO far, but it has to be able to affect someone who's right next to you, or even in your own square.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Okay, then keep it at Close range [25 ft + 5 ft/2 caster levels] which is standard and make the radius 20 ft. However, you still don't want to be affected by your own spell. I'm sure there is a way around this, but I'm not sure what it is.

    Debby
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    I think I have a solution. :3

    Edit: Yeah...that should work...
    Last edited by Trobby; 2009-09-11 at 11:49 AM.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    If you change "creatures" to "opponents" you'll keep your party safe too.

    Debby
    Last edited by Debihuman; 2009-09-11 at 12:10 PM.
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Nah, it keeps the spell within 3rd level to have it affect your allies. That way, in order to use it properly, you at least have to get out of the range at which you might hurt your own party casters.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PirateGirl

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elemental Plane of Purple
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Area seems to be written oddly. "Radius-burst burst" doesn't make any sense to me. Shout and greater shout have cone-shaped bursts.
    Spells like web and silence have a clearly-defined radius (10 ft, 20 ft respectively)). . Burst makes more sense since the effect isn't something that lingers. I recommend changing to a "sphere-shaped burst."


    From the SRD:
    A burst spell affects whatever it catches in its area, even including creatures that you can’t see. It can’t affect creatures with total cover from its point of origin (in other words, its effects don’t extend around corners). The default shape for a burst effect is a sphere, but some burst spells are specifically described as cone-shaped. A burst’s area defines how far from the point of origin the spell’s effect extends.
    Debby
    P.E.A.C.H. Please Evaluate And Critique Honestly. Being nicer and kinder doesn't hurt either. Note I generally only critique 3.5 and Pathfinder material.
    Please, please, please when using non-core material, cite to the books. There are too many books to wade through to find the one with the feat, special ability or spell you use.
    my creations in homebrew signature thread

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    I did mean sphere-shaped burst. I have no idea where I got "radius-burst burst."

    And I think that should work, but I think I should also make a stipulation in the spell rules that total cover doesn't protect you. (After all, hiding behind a tower shield never stopped the Terrible Pun-Pun, so why should it stop this spell?)

    ...DC 17.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    I wish I knew...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    Couple of things:

    1) Is it Int Damage, or simply an Int Penalty? If it is a penalty, I'd say this is no more powerful than Ray of Enfeeblement. If it is Int Damage, then it becomes more powerful than Shivering Touch. For balance sake, let us call this a penalty.

    2) Bards don't get 3rd level spells until 7th level at the earliest. Do you really expect a Wizard or Sorcerer to get this spell before a Bard? Come on, bad puns are like your first week in Bard Camp. Make this a Bard1 spell.

    3) Why sonic damage? I might give a Will save/negates to avoid smacking one's self after hearing the pun for said damage, but I don't see how there is any concussive force from the pun itself.

    4) Range should be 30' burst, centered on self. After all, anyone who hears the pun will feel the effects, ally or not. Perhaps an ability to use Ventriloquism as something like a Spectral Hand (being able to redirect the center of the spell), but that's getting complicated.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Underlord View Post
    All hail great Shneekeythulhu! Ia Ia Shneeky fthagn
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quite possibly, the best rebuttal I have ever witnessed.
    Joker Bard - the DM's solution to the Batman Wizard.
    Takahashi no Onisan - The scariest Samurai alive
    Incarnum and YOU: a reference guide
    Soulmelds, by class and slot: Another Incarnum reference
    Multiclassing for Newbies: A reference guide for the rest of us

    My homebrew world in progress: Falcora

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Here and there...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Terrible Pun: Bard/Wizard/Sorcerror Spell

    The spell is intended to center on self, but I couldn't find any other spell that would specify an origin point like that. Hopefully I did the notation properly.

    As for the Sonic damage, it's what brings it up to a 3/3/3 spell for all the casters, and the reason for it causing the pain is that it just...hurts...so...much! It's literally causing the victim's brain to snap in half *Mostly figuratively*.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun View Post
    ...How does one cuddle mercilessly?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coidzor View Post
    Curse your Introbulosity!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •