Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
2010-04-18, 02:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Sad place
3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
For instance:
Primary terrain for trolls is cold mountains. But according to Fire Giant's Environment trolls live in symbiosis with them, but not with Frost Giants. Fire Giants live on warm mountains and Frost Giants live on cold mountains. Hmm? Even Gnolls have symbiosis with Trolls, even though they don't share the same language and live in completely different environments (compare desert and Himālaya).
Kobolds live in forests, but they are made as miners... They even have bonus for mining, but several other creatures like dwarves don't possess such affinity to mining (no bonus) but they live in mountains. I find it hard to understand what sort of mining you do in forests...
I could give more examples, but I do wonder what they were thinking when they wrote up these environments?Last edited by Jon_Dahl; 2010-04-18 at 02:55 AM.
-
2010-04-18, 02:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments is not so well thought-out?
D&D developers were on crack during the whole development - not only that.
-
2010-04-18, 03:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- A place with no pants
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
... Why the hell would trolls work together with fire giants? Isn't fire the only thing that does lethal damage to them?
-
2010-04-18, 03:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-18, 04:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
Who even uses the environments? I simply slot monsters in as and when I feel like it...
-
2010-04-18, 04:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
Actually, all monsters are in the same environment - dungeons :)
-
2010-04-18, 04:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Sad place
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
I share your view, but this thread was mainly created to behold the "ingenuity" of the developers
And about Fire Giants bullying Trolls into submission... Well... Since warm mountains are quite far away from cold mountains (temperate being in between) I see little point in hauling trolls all this way, there has to be better options closer... Thats like travelling from Kilimanjaro to pick up henchmen from Scottish Highlands. Easy?
-
2010-04-18, 04:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
"Common environment" isn't the same as "only environment". Also, "warm mountains" are generally just a few thousand feet down from the cold parts of the very same mountain.
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-18, 04:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Dinosaur Museum aw yisss.
- Gender
Re: 3.5 - Monster Environments are not so well thought-out?
Has anyone ever actually used a beholder in "cold hills"? As opposed to, say, underground?
The Iron Avatarist Hall of Fame!
Prizes(Un)Official Best Playground Avatarist Competition
----
Also, buy my stuff! T-Shirts too!
-
2010-04-18, 04:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Britland
- Gender