New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Mongoose87's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    I think I have come up with a way to make a Monk that is relatively decent at its concept role: skirmisher with many attacks. Tell me what you think.

    The first thing that this hinges on is my having correctly interpreted the Pathfinder concept of CR. In Pathfinder, a monstrous race has a base ECL of its CR.

    The monstrous race in question, today, is the centaur. No longer is it a stinking ECL of 6. Now, it provides 4HD for a CR of 3. Pretty sweet, is it?

    We then apply the Feral from Savage Species to the centaur. We now had a character with an ECL of 4, full BaB for 4 monstrous HD, with good Will and Reflex saves, bonuses to all our stats but Int and, the best part, pounce. Without sacrificing a single level to LA, or the like, we've built a chassis upon which Monk levels can be stacked, allowing the Monk to make use of its two main class features: flurry of blows and increased speed. Furthermore, we have four levels of a higher HD (d10), enough levels of full BaB to get our fourth iterative, and a buttload of stat increases to help reduce our MAD.
    Last edited by Mongoose87; 2010-04-18 at 11:24 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Ring of Evasion means never playing a monk with monk levels again. There is just no reason to dip that stuff. I know we're all about using every part of the buffalo here, but can we just admit that it's inedible?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Eldritch Horror in the Playground Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose87 View Post
    We then apply the Feral from Savage Species to the centaur.

    Thank you, ladies, gentlemen, and hideous abberations from beyond time and space, and good night.


    Didn't Pathfinder also make the Monk less sucky anyways?

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Colossus in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Pounce is a one-way street; part of the appeal of the huge movement speed is being able to kick peoples' face in and avoid counterattacks entirely. It helps in approaching, but not leaving. Also, it's still limited with Charge movement; rarely do you not have enough movement to close in on an opponent not behind some manner of obstacle. What you really want is immediate action movement to cover both. Bounding Assault [maneuver] plus Pounce is quite good. Travel Devotion is excellent. Combine that with Sphinx Claws and you have a rather versatile offense.

    Though since you picked Travel Devotion, might as well pick Cleric and go Sacred Fist and rock the divine casting to 7th heaven. So...yeah. It's a decent idea, but I don't think it's an actual solution. Besides, simple Monk fixes already exist in Sacred Fist, Tashalatora Psy War/Ardent/Psion (with Genius), Unarmed Swordsage and Enlightened Fist depending on exactly what you want.
    Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
    Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
    SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Mongoose87's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Glyphstone View Post
    Didn't Pathfinder also make the Monk less sucky anyways?
    It would've been hard to make it worse.
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Ring of Evasion means never playing a monk with monk levels again. There is just no reason to dip that stuff. I know we're all about using every part of the buffalo here, but can we just admit that it's inedible?

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Eldritch Horror in the Playground Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose87 View Post
    It would've been hard to make it worse.
    CW Samurai? Truenamer?

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Mongoose87's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Glyphstone View Post
    CW Samurai? Truenamer?
    Well, yeah, sure, if you want to completely change the class.
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Ring of Evasion means never playing a monk with monk levels again. There is just no reason to dip that stuff. I know we're all about using every part of the buffalo here, but can we just admit that it's inedible?

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Sep 2007

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Glyphstone View Post
    CW Samurai? Truenamer?
    Monk is better than Samurai? Good to know that the monk's abilities are at least worth the larger hit dice, full BAB, heavy armor, and decent weapon proficiencies.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    absolmorph's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    A place with no pants

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rainbownaga View Post
    Monk is better than Samurai? Good to know that the monk's abilities are at least worth the larger hit dice, full BAB, heavy armor, and decent weapon proficiencies.
    The monk has class features.
    And it doesn't basically say "use a short sword and bastard sword and TWF."
    Last edited by absolmorph; 2010-04-19 at 12:25 AM.
    Some men just want to watch the world shift uncomfortably in its seat.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Kylarra View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by absolmorph View Post
    I happen to like screwing around with Handle Animal.
    Red Mage, is that you?
    Quote Originally Posted by Rawhide View Post
    Now you're cranking it up to eleven.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimonite View Post
    A week ago, I didn't know who you were. Now I know: you're the BEST PERSON EVER.
    Quote Originally Posted by noparlpf View Post
    You seem to be having trouble with the idea that a rulebook can contradict itself, because it shouldn't, but...WotC.

    If you're reading this for some reason, you can find me in a few places on the web as azoicennead.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Banned
     
    JonestheSpy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008

    Default Re: A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    I've got a much easier way: full BAB, AC bonus that increases starting at level 3 and goes up every 3 levels after, and allow flurry as a standard action. There goes most of your problems right there.

    Oh, and I'd probably allow Combat Expertise as a bonus feat without needing the 13 Int.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Mongoose87's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by JonestheSpy View Post
    I've got a much easier way: full BAB, AC bonus that increases starting at level 3 and goes up every 3 levels after, and allow flurry as a standard action. There goes most of your problems right there.

    Oh, and I'd probably allow Combat Expertise as a bonus feat without needing the 13 Int.
    This is more of a build than a houserule.
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Ring of Evasion means never playing a monk with monk levels again. There is just no reason to dip that stuff. I know we're all about using every part of the buffalo here, but can we just admit that it's inedible?

  11. - Top - End - #11

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Glyphstone View Post
    CW Samurai? Truenamer?
    The thing is, the Monk/Truenamer PrC in ToM is actually a step up from Monk and Truenamer. Not enough to boost it a Tier, but enough that it will be able to contribute more often than pure Monk 20.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Apr 2010

    Default Re: A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    At any rate, this seems to work. I've avoided Monks like the plague (because they suck XD) so I don't know that much about them, but still. Also, your DM could have a lot of fun with a centaur Monk. Donkey-kicks to the face, rearing attacks to finish off your flurry of blows. Would make some good combat description.
    Homebrew: Ghost Rider, a 3.5e Base Class inspired by Marvel's Comics.


    So guys, the new Iron Man trailer, huh?

    Spoiler
    Show


  13. - Top - End - #13
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Akal Saris's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by JonestheSpy View Post
    I've got a much easier way: full BAB, AC bonus that increases starting at level 3 and goes up every 3 levels after, and allow flurry as a standard action. There goes most of your problems right there.

    Oh, and I'd probably allow Combat Expertise as a bonus feat without needing the 13 Int.
    Yeah, I think this would probably let the monk actually work as a mobile skirmisher. And it removes the need for PF to treat levels of monk as full BAB for combat maneuvers.

    But yes, I think the feral centaur monk for PF looks like a good build. Bonus points if you can swing 2x damage charges with your hoof/fists from Spirited Charge :P
    Handbooks: (Hosted on the new MixMax forums)
    [3.5] The Poison Handbook
    [3.5] (New) Master of Shrouds Handbook
    [3.5 Base Class] Healer's Handbook

    Trophies!
    Spoiler
    Show

    Thanks to Strategos and Jumilk for the awesome Iron Chef trophies!

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Banned
     
    Zeful's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" "unsucky" Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by JonestheSpy View Post
    I've got a much easier way: full BAB, AC bonus that increases starting at level 3 and goes up every 3 levels after, and allow flurry as a standard action. There goes most of your problems right there.

    Oh, and I'd probably allow Combat Expertise as a bonus feat without needing the 13 Int.
    I'd go: Full-bab. Monks get to-hit, damage, and AC bonuses from Wis (with AC being the first level ability, To-hit being a 3rd-4th, and damage being 5th). At 6th level they may make a full attack as a standard action once per-encounter with additional uses per-encounter every 3 levels thereafter (capstone turning it to At-will).

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: A "simple" unsucky Monk? (PF+3.5e)

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinfire Titan View Post
    The thing is, the Monk/Truenamer PrC in ToM is actually a step up from Monk and Truenamer. Not enough to boost it a Tier, but enough that it will be able to contribute more often than pure Monk 20.
    at level 20, the monk gains the outsider template. making it possible to summon and compel it using the planer binding spells, gate, etc..

    Level 20 monks are extremely rare as they are normally too weak to survive that long. Those that do get summoned and bound to serve as an exotic display in a zoo/carnival/circus/whatever.
    Last edited by taltamir; 2010-04-19 at 05:22 PM.
    I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman!

    the glass is always 100% full. Approximately 50% of its volume is full of dihydrogen monoxide and some dissolved solutes, and approx 50% a mixture of gasses known as "air" which contains roughly (by volume) 78.08% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.038% carbon dioxide, and trace amounts of other gases.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •