Results 1 to 30 of 35
Thread: Love and the Paladin's Code
-
2010-09-02, 02:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- CAlifornia, USA
- Gender
Love and the Paladin's Code
So the Paladin's code basically makes them the vanguard's of society and order - they put the needs of others first, and their own selfish impulses second. But how would a love dynamic influence that Paladin's actions? Would they snub their lover in favor of their duty, or would they consider said interest a duty if equal import? Maybe it's wrong to view love as a "duty" at all, but how else would a Paladin view it, especially if you throw in the added complication of marriage vows? What if the love interest is alignment-opposed to the Paladin? Does love, arguably the purest expression of "good" in the world outweigh the potential risk of aiding and abetting an evil act? Would a Paladin have to take the fall if they defended an evil or chaotic lover, not necessarily becoming a Blackguard but something else entirely?
Here's the situation as it happened: a Paladin-in-training-who's-skills-include-ladykilling is up against an enemy he knows he can't defeat, and opts to use his 18 Cha to seduce her instead. It just so happens that this woman is a Drider, and in addition to being an awesome idea for a sitcom, most cases would seem to disqualify our hero from any such relationship. But here's the catch: He's a Paladin of the Goddess of Love and Passion. Does his faith overrule the typical Code in this case, or does he fall as well?
I would tell you the current consensus we (me and a few friends who talked about this) came to, but I want to know what YOU think, as well as any other complications that can arise between a Paladin and his/her love interest I haven't thought of yet.
-
2010-09-02, 03:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
I would question the paladin using seduction to influence a contest, but I guess with a love god(ess) that can slide.
I had a paladin in the game I'm running fall in love and betrothed to a succubus. It was amusing what happened after he found out.
Now while the case is different, I will say this falls under knowingly associating with an evil entity. Even with a love/passion deity I would say he would fall for trying to make a romantic relationship with her.Originally Posted by Alabenson
-
2010-09-02, 03:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
If the Goddess of Love and Passion advocates defeating/converting your foes by becoming friends with benefits, that's a marked plus for him. But calculated seduction in order to save your own skin is a false passion--a definite minus. So the question is whether the paladin is genuine in his desire to get into it with the drider woman.
Last edited by Math_Mage; 2010-09-02 at 03:46 AM.
-
2010-09-02, 04:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Western Australia
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Some of the problems become simpler if we adopt the definition of love -- uncommon in fiction, where love is all-consuming and cannot be denied, but arguably more realistic -- that love is as much a choice and an action as an emotion. Regardless of your personal opinions, this is certainly a plausible way for a lawful character to look at love; paladins in general are probably not the types to let themselves get carried away by passion and do something rash or foolish.
Different lawful characters, and therefore different paladins, will see this differently. Some will takes vows of chastity, considering intimate relationships to be "selfish impulses", or at least considering them something that, while good, is a sacrifice they're willing to make. Others would consider love and fidelity to be among the highest expressions of good, and even consider holding down a steady relationship and maybe raising children as a moral duty, as you suggest.
Either way, in general, a paladin wouldn't snub their lover. Whatever a paladin does, they ought to do whole-heartedly and with dedication; they will either take a lover and stand by them come hell or high-level wizard, or forswear such relationships.
This doesn't mean that a paladin has to wait until marriage and wed for life. Specific views on short-term dalliances, and on divorce, would be influenced by the laws and customs of their realm and religion, and lawful characters will tend to be conservative about it. But if it's socially accepted, a paladin ought to be quite free to "play the field", as long as his or her romances are pursued with honesty and for the benefit of both partners.
Originally Posted by Squeejee
What happens if a lover's alignment changes to something incompatible? Ah, now there's a dilemma to put the tired old "kill the baby or doom the world" discussion to shame.
Originally Posted by Squeejee
But, if your paladin wants to actually try and bring the drider on as an ally and a genuine partner... well... if she's not evil, then I guess it would be okay, especially for...
Originally Posted by SqueejeeI support paladins and the alignment system.
My Homebrew Gaming Stuff (not updated lately) - My Campaign (ended)
Homebrew licence:
SpoilerAll my homebrew stuff is released under the Open Game License, except where based on non-OGC work or otherwise stated. For Section 15:
<name of homebrew here> Copyright <year first posted>, T. Pederick
-
2010-09-02, 04:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
How would it benefit your game if that would cause the paladin to fall?
A paladin is the literal knight. Wooing a (albeit disgusting) lady is nothing that contradicts this.Do you use the mechanics to play the game,
or do you use the game to play the mechanics?
My opinion on paladins
-
2010-09-02, 04:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Look at it this way. The character saw the good potential in her, he seduces her, using their love to show her her inner good and change her over slowly to his way of thinking and alignment
Love is just another redeeming feature, so would i personally punish a pali in this situation? Not at all, it is a gambit that if works is quite unique, and i value players thinking outside the box.
If this is 3.5 standard, not FR, then the godess really has nothing to do with the code...BUT this would be a good way to incorporate the gods theme with the redeeming of an evil creature/character
-
2010-09-02, 04:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
A Paladin shall know no anger, nor hatred, nor love.
Last edited by FoE; 2010-09-02 at 04:55 AM.
-
2010-09-02, 05:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
I prefer the Altisian Jedi perspective. Love is fine. Attachment is fine. Unreasonable attachment- "obsession" is the problem.
BoED states there is nothing requiring an Exalted character (including paladins) to be celibate- but does suggest paladins and similar characters should avoid being involved in exploitative relationships of any kind.Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2010-09-02, 05:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- England
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Is he in love with her, or just seducing her so she won't kill him? I'm confused.
Piratebold-Bard by Elder Tsofu | Backer #121 of the Giantitp Kickstarter | My homebrew
-
2010-09-02, 07:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- In the T.A.R.D.I.S.
- Gender
-
2010-09-02, 07:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
I think the standard Jedi Order see all romantic love as inherently too selfish, and passionate, to be acceptable- only compassion- defined as love for people in general rather than specific people, is acceptable.
Which was one of the big flaws in that Order.
The old version of the code made more sense- not:
"There is no passion, there is serenity" but:
"Passion, yet serenity"
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Jedi_CodeLast edited by hamishspence; 2010-09-02 at 07:37 AM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2010-09-02, 08:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
-
2010-09-02, 08:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
He's a paladin of a love deity. Converting evil to good in a mutual enjoyable manner is his job. He shouldn't fall for that unless he allows said Drider to keep doing evil around him.
Oh, that's easy. Sovereign glue them to a church pew and sic the evangelists on them. /offtopic
-
2010-09-02, 08:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2010-09-02, 11:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Torres Novas, PT
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Ah, paladin thread - must be one of the days of the week that ends in -day.
Depends WHAT code you're using - if you're using the one in the PHB, then it's a no-no.
Paladins will not associate with Evil creatures (as I assume that drider is) for any remarkable length of time.
On the other hand, Evil or not, the paladin has to be really careful when seducing: he can't lie (like, at all - he can't say she's the most beautiful woman she's ever seen if he doesn't believe her to be). He can't also mislead the seducee (does that exist? it does now) into thinking he's in it for the long-term if he's not (which most adventuring paladins won't be).Morituri nolumus morit - We who are about to die... don't want to
"BUT, LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPERMAN." - Death, "Reaperman"
-
2010-09-02, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
I think the definition of "associate" is up for question.
If a paladin is trying to convert someone who is evil, that paladin has to spend time in that person's presence. There are stories of missionaries who walk into the den of evil to talk to evil men and get them to renounce their ways.
As for the OP's question, I think the defining factor is the answer to the question, "Why did he do it?"
If the paladin seduced the drider to save his own skin, then he is acting out of fear or conflict ("I cannot defeat her through strength of arms, so I shall strike her in her heart"). If he is trying to save her as a person (i.e., "You are evil, but there is hope and good in the world for you"), then I see no issue.
If it is a situation of trying to kill two birds with one stone ("I cannot defeat her, and since saving an evil soul is a good thing to do, I will do both by seducing her"), then what matters is the follow-through. If the paladin devouts time and energy and emotion into the drider, making it clear that he well and truly loves her, then he is good. If he abandons her, then he abandons his duty (possibly enough that he will need to atone).1. Have fun. It's only a game.
2. The GM has the final say. Everyone else is just a guest.
3. The game is for the players. A proper host entertains one's guests.
4. Everyone is allowed an opinion. Some games are not as cool as they seem.
-
2010-09-02, 02:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
-
2010-09-02, 02:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Torres Novas, PT
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
By the Core RAW, they most certainly CANNOT lie, not if they want to keep being paladins. It's says right there, from the srd:
Additionally, a paladin’s code requires that she respect legitimate authority, act with honor (not lying, not cheating, not using poison, and so forth)
Missionairies can walk wherever they want - they're not paladins. A common definition of "associate" is "have a relationship with". If the paladin doesn't intend to have a relationship with the drider, he's in the clear.... unless he leads her to think he is, in which case he better go find the nearest cleric for the daily Atonement.Morituri nolumus morit - We who are about to die... don't want to
"BUT, LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPERMAN." - Death, "Reaperman"
-
2010-09-02, 03:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Oxford, England
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Interestingly, in a game I'm in our LG Cleric of Tea and Crumpets (don't ask) seduced an Erenyes, and has been going steady with her for a while. She was quite confused by all the squishy (love) feelings she was experiencing as this opposing cleric behaved nicely to her for no reason at all, as she was only really used to hate, battle-fervor and bordom due to hellish paperwork.
The real kicker though? The use of an atonement spell during their first "alone-time" , resulting in her switching to LG and switching devilish abilities for angelic ones. After all, if an angel can fall, why can't one rise?
We now have the catchphrase "The hot Lawful-D***ings will continue, until moral improves."
-
2010-09-02, 03:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
For the case in question? Well, it's treading a very fine line, but it could be possible. Paladins aren't required to use force to solve all difficulties, and that includes Drider enemies.
If he's really, genuinely attempting to reform the Drider? Sure, why not! The real catch is going to be whether or not he's being honest to the drider, and whether or not he's being honest with himself. If he really thinks that no being is beyond redemption, is really willing to love that drider (scary-looking claws and all), and is prepared to back up that conviction with his own actions, then that's perfectly Paladin-y. But if he's using his relationship with the Drider exclusively as a means to an end, then that's neither honorable nor honest.
-
2010-09-02, 03:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
The phrase used is " a paladin falls if they grossly violate their code of conduct"
A lie is always a violation- but it's not always a gross violation. This is brought up in one of the OoTS bonus strips in War & XPs- when a couple of paladins lie to Miko and do not fall.
And (if you go by BoVD) a lie is not automatically an evil act, either.Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2010-09-02, 03:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
May I add there are rules in the BoED to use Diplomacy in order to convert Evil people to the good side?
-
2010-09-02, 03:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- CAlifornia, USA
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Very interesting, but I think I've made a critical mistake - the word "Seduce" implies a more malicious intent than was intended. It was more an idea of "we don't all have to die here - let's try this nonviolent solution!" He proceeded wholeheartedly and was careful to emphasize that his character was acting purely (which he later backed up via RP).
-
2010-09-02, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
I'm not really certain how a deity of Love and Passion can be Lawful Good to begin with. Are you following the "one-step" alignment follower rule and the deity is NG? Because that's just about the only configuration that makes remote sense. Unless this is a Paladin of Freedom, and is therefore allowed to be chaotic (which fits love/passion far better imo).
Just for clarity a love/passion deity would be Neutral or CN in my assessment.
-
2010-09-02, 03:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Torres Novas, PT
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Cheating doesn't have to be Evil, either - neither is the use of poison (despite what the alignment books may say, as exemplified by the Poison spell lacking the Evil descriptor). Paladins have to be Good, and Lawful, and do X, Y, and Z, things that aren't necessarily connected.
If the drider isn't known for doing Evil stuff to nice people, then that seems to be a possible course of action for the Paladin. If she is, that's another story: again from the srd, "Additionally, a paladin’s code requires that she (...) punish those who harm or threaten innocents." It's still perfectly fine if she does Evil stuff to Evil people. Huh.Morituri nolumus morit - We who are about to die... don't want to
"BUT, LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPERMAN." - Death, "Reaperman"
-
2010-09-02, 03:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
-
2010-09-02, 03:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
There's a difference between "punishing villains" and "doing evil stuff- as exemplified by the fact that "Murder is one of the most horrible acts a being can commit (BoVD) and a very severe corrupt act (FC2) but "Execution for serious crimes is widely practiced and does not qualify as evil" (BoED).
A paladin may never commit an Evil act, without Falling. Not even if the victim is an evil being. So, if the paladin chose to "punish those who threaten innocents" by torturing them, or murdering them, they would Fall.
The tricky question is- what counts as "Murder" and what "Execution"?Last edited by hamishspence; 2010-09-02 at 03:50 PM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2010-09-02, 03:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Wandering in Harrekh
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
The Paladin's back is up against the wall, in this case. He knows his strength won't work, so he tries something else. That something else happened to work, for whatever reason. Maybe his belief that no being is beyond redemption is actually correct. Maybe the Drider was so surprised that she momentarily forgot about using his spleen as a wall decoration. Maybe the whole thing is just a ruse on the Drider's part, a set up so she can mess with him before she kills him. Whatever the case, the Drider did not rip the guy's throat out.
-
2010-09-02, 03:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Gender
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
That's because Old Order Jedi weren't paladins. They were glorified Judges as far as I'm concerned.
My fantasy/RPG blog A Voyage Into the Fantastic
-
2010-09-02, 04:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Love and the Paladin's Code
Some Jedi might have been paladinish (there was even an order of force users loosely allied to the Jedi, who used guns and other weapons more than lightsabers, and called the Grey Paladins).
Still, by Yoda's era, Jedi had become the government's enforcers more than other things.Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele