View Poll Results: Do you prefer the old 'flavorful' spell names or the new simplified ones?
- Voters
- 35. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
2007-04-16, 08:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- In a mysterious marsh
- Gender
Who loves Flavourful spell names?
I don't know why this annoys me but one of the things I dislike about 3.5 is how they cut out many of the interesting parts from spells, especially in reference to the spell's creator or patron Examples (Bigsby's, Snilloc's Melf's Mordenkien and some many others) . I can understand trying to make the spells as customizable as possable and trying to make them fit in a nonstandard game but still I like rolling off those interesting almost tongue twister names because they give some flavor. I mean can't you just feel the oddness of Simbul’s skeletal deliquescence while it's updated name corporeal instability feels like a textbook description
-
2007-04-16, 08:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
Bigby, Melf, Mordenkein, Tenser, and a couple others are still around.
Not having played previous versions, I can't really say I mind."We have become like unto tiny refreshing GODS!"
--Popcorn
Quoteses, preciousssss...
Proud owner of one Gold Star, as awarded by Count Chumleigh.
Member of the Metric System Fan Club.
-
2007-04-16, 08:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
Definitely the old versions. The 3.5 Player's Handbook does have some of those, like Mordenkainen's disjunction. Then I looked at the SRD, saw Mage's Disjunction, and thought "what is this?"
Proud member of the Hinjo fanclub
A Video Gamer's Perspective: My thoughts on all different kinds of entertainment, especially video games and anime... plus maybe the occasional webcomic reference...
-
2007-04-16, 08:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
The SRD has had those names stripped out for copyright/"product identity" reasons. The PHB and actual WotC publications retain them.
-
2007-04-16, 08:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Toon Town
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
It doesn't really matter much to me either way. I never got into premade campaign settings, so I never really understood who Otiluke, Bigby, and the like were anyway.
Since I've only ever played in custom settings, the names of these spells introduced a small sort of continuity flaw, since they'd be named after wizards who never existed in the world. Besides, they never added "Melf's Minute Meteors" to 3rd ed in the first place, so anything for me to miss in this respect is already gone.
-
2007-04-16, 09:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Mare Imbrium, The Moon
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
Though not specifically on topic, I would like to state for the record that the ToB maneuver title "Five-Shadow-Creeping-Ice-Enervation-Strike!" is totally awesome.
-
2007-04-16, 09:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
I used to like the more interesting names, but as I've gotten more and more into actually playing D&D with other people I've learned to appreciate the simpler names. I used to call them by abbreviations anyways; now I'm actually using the real name.
Originally Posted by Quietus
-
2007-04-16, 09:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Illinois
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
I tend to enjoy them, even though I don't deal with Greyhawk. There's just something neat about casting Otiluke's Resilient Sphere as opposed to Resilient Sphere. Part of it is just the Form-Blazing-Sword style goodness of naming your superweapons, but it's amusing to see shticks shine through the game. Otiluke has his spheres, Bigby has his hands, and Tasha and Otto have gotten some particularly amusing little numbers; Otto's Imperative Ambulation is made of win for its name alone.
Last edited by Merlin the Tuna; 2007-04-16 at 09:23 PM.
Merlin the Tuna
-
2007-04-16, 09:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
There's that, and I also don't think that characters would necesarily have names for their spells (maybe wizards would, but especially not sorcerors). So I think of the names as mostly just for the players to use anyway.
EDIT: I voted for the simpler names, but then I do enjoy the interesting names even if I never refer to the spells as such in-character, so maybe that wasn't the best response.Last edited by Scribbler; 2007-04-16 at 09:40 PM.
They say the pen is mightier than the sword, so I took Weapon Specialization.
-
2007-04-16, 09:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Arcanix, Aundair
Re: Who loves Flavourful spell names?
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words ... English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
"The only thing necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing."