Results 1 to 30 of 33
-
2007-07-04, 09:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
I've been pondering about the battle of Azure City for a while now, and I've realized that Redcloak's and Xykon's army would be at big advantage if they had attacked at night.
I mean, both hobgoblins and undead have got Darkvision out to 60 feet. That's not very much, but if battle was taking place at night, Azurites would have to light torches or something similiar on the walls to see anything. That means hobgoblin arrows would come from nowhere- hobgoblins not only wold see in the dark out to 60 feet, but AC soldiers would be illuminated. Not to mention hobgoblins would try to quench the torches as soon as they're on walls, rendering defenders blind. Not to mention it would make it harder to observe moves of the army if there were dark and said army wasn't carrying torches.
I know that:
1) They won anyway
2) This comic isn't about efectiveness,
but would that work?Last edited by Morty; 2007-07-04 at 09:59 AM.
My FFRP characters. Avatar by Ashen Lilies. Sigatars by Ashen Lilies, Gullara and Purple Eagle.
Interested in the Nexus FFRP setting? See our Discord server.
-
2007-07-04, 09:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Goblin land (Argentina)
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night
Xykon didn't attack at night for only one reason: HE IS AN IDIOT far too many times xykon have done stupid things, ¿why are you surprised that he is doing something stupid now?
Villans in this comic are Dimmu Borgir fans .... wait! what's V doing there?!
elan : Dum Dum Duuuuum!
roy :I think you just failed a "shut the hell up" check
(thanks Threeshades for the av)
-
2007-07-04, 10:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night
Except, there's another factor; time is important. They know that Shojo died, at least, and so it's best to attack immediately, rather than allow Hinjo time to regroup the defenders and attempt to raise their morale. Also, since the Azurites had found out about the attack a few hours before it happened, they didn't have much time to plan strategy either. Another benefit, though Xykon probably wouldn't have known, is that there's no time to negotiate with the nobles either.
Last edited by yoshi927; 2007-07-04 at 10:02 AM.
SpoilerI have just two words for Erfworld:
God Mode.
-ParsonHave you ever considered that such a convenient solution doesn't exist in the real world?
-Raine Sage
"We are the people our parents warned us about..."- Jimmy Buffett
-
2007-07-04, 10:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Xykon (or more likely Redcloak) obviously decided that the benefits of attacking quickly out weighed those of waiting to dark. Remember, Miko's warning only arrived a short while before the army (see #376) so the defenders were still in disarray somewhat.
If a tree falls in the forest and the PCs aren't around to hear it... what do I roll to see how loud it is?
Is 3.5 a fried-egg, chili-chutney sandwich?
-
2007-07-04, 10:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- A Little Basket.
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night? all the reasons for attacking at night are reasons of self defense :) defenders are blind etc :) but Xykon doesn't give two pennies for minions :) he just wanted to get to the gate, nothing else. Tacticians would attack at night (or just before dawn, but o well ;) ) Xykon would attack as soon as the army got there :)
-
2007-07-04, 10:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Attacking at night would have given time for Azure city reinforcements to arrive. Chang mentions that there wasn't any time for anymore reinforcements, so Xykon had to attack immediately to make sure that was true.
-
2007-07-04, 11:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Manchester, UK
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
60 feet of darkvision isn't really a lot when you're in a melee with up to 40,000 participants. Also, we have no guarantee that Xykon himself or any of the other undead in the army would be able to see in the dark, and since he's by far their most potent weapon, that could have caused problems!
-
2007-07-04, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
All undead have 60 ft. darkvision. Also, while 60 ft. darkvision isn't much, humans don't have any sort of darkvision, which puts hobgoblins and undead on advantage.
As for above posts: I think it'd be fairly easy to attack at night while still following the original plan. Xykon and Redcloak would just have to coordinate moves of the army differently.My FFRP characters. Avatar by Ashen Lilies. Sigatars by Ashen Lilies, Gullara and Purple Eagle.
Interested in the Nexus FFRP setting? See our Discord server.
-
2007-07-04, 11:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- R'lyeh
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
in a horse-powered traveling world, waiting for the nightfall is really not important unless the said reinforcements are already at sight.
If you look at it, it'd be better to attack at night, true. One minus for the Azurites. They wouldn't get much better in the day timespan.
-
2007-07-04, 11:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
True. Looks like Xykon really didn't care about city or his soldiers. He just wanted distraction.
But, you know, he probably payed for that.
In the darkness everytnig could go BETTER for him.
For example Miko certainly would have more problems with getting out of cell.
She certainly wouldn't noticed that one iron bar is damaged, for example.
Don't you think?Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2007-07-04, 11:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- BROOKLYN!!
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Attacking at night is BAD FOR VILLAINS!.
Heroes gain +10 Badassery when night falls.
Almost every action movie ends at night and the villain tends to die.Gitp's No. 1 Cake hater
On Vacation until Aug 7th.
Spell currently researching: Explosive Pie.
Weapon currently crafting: +1 cakebane kris
-
2007-07-04, 11:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Northern Virginia
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
That would require Xykon to exercise patience. Nuff said.
-
2007-07-04, 02:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Yeah, Xykon is as good at tactics as Miko is at social relations. But Redcloak isn't dumb and would have thought about it.
Though quite obviously the reason was the ultimate Plot.My FFRP characters. Avatar by Ashen Lilies. Sigatars by Ashen Lilies, Gullara and Purple Eagle.
Interested in the Nexus FFRP setting? See our Discord server.
-
2007-07-04, 02:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Russia-Canada
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Gess what? X and RC does not care about number of dead hobgoblins. RC race care had started only in the midle of this events. Plus, why should you care about darkness when you outnumbering enemies 1 to 1000???
---> praise all mighty avatar of death!!!
-
2007-07-04, 02:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
The torches really wouldn't illuminate the wall very well - if the defenders used them at all, which they probably wouldn't. Meanwhile, the hobgoblins apparently had quite a few more archers than the defenders.
-
2007-07-04, 02:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2007-07-04, 02:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- NYC
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Okay, first of all, there's lots of low level spells such as Light, Daylight, and such, that would almost completely negate all advantages of attacking with an army at night, so it isn't that great of an idea in the first place.
Secondly, X & R wanted to attack ASAP.
That's it.Last edited by JaxGaret; 2007-07-04 at 02:40 PM.
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
2007-07-04, 02:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Ancapistan
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Is it possible they cant distinguish between night and day, so some could think its night, but it really isnt. Its a possibility!
Dark Souls Remake in a Nutshell
Don't mess with a Primarch
Sometimes I make avatars too. Shoot me a PM if interested.
-
2007-07-04, 02:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
-
2007-07-04, 02:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Denmark
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
There do exist magic solutions to counter darkness:
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/daylight.htm
The spell has duration and lit area.
But a wand or some scrolls may cover the need.
when all they need is a carrier e.g. a catapult boulder.
AC city should have the funds to keep this kind of magic on storage.
So not much would have been gained by waiting
-
2007-07-04, 03:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
I agree with a lot of the facts OP mentioned. I also thought of another benefit: Xykon doesn't need to wait a long time. Redcloak just has to say "Later that night", and day would go by so fast that AC still wouldn't have enough time to prepare. (Yes, I'm joking, but I still agree with OP)
Haiku
They're easy to write,
But they're hard to understand.
Refrigerator.
-
2007-07-04, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Yeah, as always, there are magical counters to everything but it'd take precious spell slots, plus such spells are dispellable and don't last for forever. So Xykon and Redcloak would still be at advantage.
My FFRP characters. Avatar by Ashen Lilies. Sigatars by Ashen Lilies, Gullara and Purple Eagle.
Interested in the Nexus FFRP setting? See our Discord server.
-
2007-07-04, 03:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Plus, why should you care about darkness when you outnumbering enemies 1 to 1000???
My guess is that, had Redcloak been solely in charge of the army, they would have, but Xykon doesn't care about tactics, and is impatient, so they just went in as soon as possible.
-
2007-07-04, 04:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Bah, i don't understand why spells would fix anything.
They're bassically torches which consume spellsots. Torches can be extinguished, but spells can be disspelled. It lasts 10 min/level.
Even considering that AC has so many clerics to illuminate all wall lenght (on 7th level let's say, it's quite high - their best warriors were on 5 and there were 13 of them...), still after 70 minutes...fizzle. Darkness one more time, in the middle of action, massacre of defenders.
And still soldiers shooting to hobgoblins within 60 -120 feet would have 20 % miss chance, and hobgoblins could hide at any moment if they injured or something. And 120+ feet - arrows from nowhere. And catapults shots from nowhere. Azurians couldn't use their catapults - even army is hard to hit when you don't see it at all. Sure, V could cast fireballs to check "if something's here" or Durkon could navigate catapults, but still theye wouldn't be effective.
Even historicallly, assaults on castles/fortified positions were ussualy made in night, from all this reasons (to reduce cassaulties e.c.).
And in fantasy world, when attacker are not the same kind as defenders - they can see well in night, and defenders cannot....
Still - hobgoblins will have powerful advantage in night, fewer of them wil fall e.c. But very simple, our fauvorite Xykon doesn't give a flying (censored) about losses pf his army, and his very probably, an idiot indeed
So he didn't attack at night.
EDIT: Oh, i just realised, that there is no way in which Durkon could navigate catapults, his darkvision is 60 feet after all...Last edited by Spiryt; 2007-07-04 at 04:25 PM.
Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2007-07-04, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Lancaster, UK
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
It's because it is so much easier to draw epic seiges taking place in daylight.
-
2007-07-04, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Easier maybe, but they are so much more epic in the night!
Fires, darkness, even greater fear, where are they, i don't see anything. Like Helm's Deep.
But obviously Elan couldn't sayBut I don't want to fight in the shade thenLast edited by Spiryt; 2007-07-04 at 05:14 PM.
Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2007-07-04, 05:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- La Puente, CA
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Actually, it is easier to draw the night scene. Just swab it in black.
But it does make for a lousy picture. So the needs of the comic dictate a day attack.
Now for an excuse for the day attack, we can try the elementals making a breach in the wall. They must be launched in the daytime so the attackers can see what the damage is. And once the breach is made, the attack must follow immediately. Any delay means the defenders start repairing the hole. As it was, V was able to add a few feet to the wall. Given hours, that means more repairs, which means a bigger ramp of dead hobgoblins is needed for the Death Knight. That's reason to attack right away.
-
2007-07-04, 05:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
But damages will be quite well visible, due to torches/daylight on the walls. Without torches deffenders won't see much so it will be bad for them.
Of course in case of moonlit night sittuasion will be quite better.
Anyway you must admit that ramp of hobgoblins was super cruel an dumb plan anyway. Every reasonable (not Xykon) commander would use some wooden ramp or sometning. Still it's Xykon so he didn't. And he also didn't attacked during night.Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2007-07-04, 10:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Gender
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Why didn't Redcloak just say, "Later that evening..."? God knows it's worked before...
No matter how far a jackass travels, it won’t come back a horse.
-
2007-07-04, 11:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
Re: Why didn't Redcloak & Xykon attack at night?
Why didn't Redcloak and Xykon attack at night?
Azure City had at least one elf on their side.
Low-light vision trumps darkvision outside on a clear night. The latter lets you see clearly (in black and white) out to 60 ft. The former sees as well as in full daylight.