Results 1 to 26 of 26
Thread: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
-
2007-10-09, 01:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Salem, OR
- Gender
Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Wizards has released excerpts from the Rules Compendium
Is anyone planning on buying this? To me, it seems like a waste of money. From what I've read, the book will mostly be a reprinting of old rules with some clarifications and commentary thrown in. To me, that doesn't justify the purchase of an entire book. Wizards seems to be marketing the book primarily on convenience, saying that it should be the only book a DM needs to have to look up rules. This is nice, but I, and I imagine most other people, are already used to running games without this convenience, and know the rules well enough to get by. We can look up obscure points if we need to, but most of the time, I'm just going to wing it anyway. What do other people think? Is this book worthwhile?My Characters:
Henning Baer: Forest of Friedland
Avatar by Mr_Saturn
-
2007-10-09, 01:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
"A form of attack that enables
an attacker to make multiple
attacks during an action
other than a full-round
action, such as the Manyshot
feat (standard
action) or a quickened
scorching ray (swift action),
allows precision
damage to be applied
only to the first attack
in the group."
Really? A quickened scorched ray doesn't get its own sneak attack?
That's uhh
dumb.
-
2007-10-09, 01:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Salem, OR
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
I can see the point there. If you're already casting the spell much faster than usual, do you really have time to aim precisely too?
My Characters:
Henning Baer: Forest of Friedland
Avatar by Mr_Saturn
-
2007-10-09, 01:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Knoxville, TN
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
It applies to the spellwarp sniper, I believe.
The greater ramifications of this passage being that it completely annihilates ranged scout builds(which is presumably what it was entirely intended to do).
As for the rules compendium itself, yeah, it sucks, won't be buying it, I've already got the rules, and it's about 7 months till 4.0 comes out. Thanks but no thanks, I'll pass on this AND exemplars of evil.I am continuing to have a social life. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Serious-Jedi-Me-Avatar by RTG0922. Thanks. Cat-assassin-avatar by onasuma, who I was too dumb to thank. Thanks for that too!
-
2007-10-09, 03:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
-
2007-10-09, 03:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Croatia
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
But Greater Manyshot should still be an exception from this rule; this rule is meant to provide general guidance, with class features or whatever being exceptions.
Anyways, I won't be buying it - they'd have to explain the rules to me extremely elegantly and with great precision to make it worth it - I don't see that happening.
"Hey that book has awesome PrCs!"
"Hey that book explained me the rules awesomely!"
ha!There is no good and evil. There is only more and less.
- Khorn'Tal
-----------------------------------------
Kalar Eshanti
-
2007-10-09, 03:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- IPR Violation
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
-
2007-10-09, 08:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Why would we need the Rules Compendium, when we have Lord Silvanos?
I doubt I'll buy it. But I think that enough people on the boards will buy it that it will clear up many common rules arguments, which is a good thing. Or they could have just released 3.75 core rule books and an updated SRD. But that would be too simple.
-
2007-10-09, 09:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Flawse Fell, Geordieland
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
I have the downloadable d20SRD.org and WOTC's D&D FAQ as desktop links on my laptop; why would I need this book? Does it even *have* USB ports or WiFi?
Last edited by bosssmiley; 2007-10-09 at 09:17 AM.
-
2007-10-09, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- NY
-
2007-10-09, 12:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Baltimore MD
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
It totally has wifi.
At least that's what it said on the WoTC site!Blunder's Law: Just because it can be fixed doesn't mean it's not broken.
-
2007-10-09, 02:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Yes.
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
The rule says multiple attacks in ONE ACTION. Meaning that it is saying the quickened scorching ray DOES get its own sneak attack, but only on the first ray. If you cast another scorching ray spell, that is a DIFFERENT action, which gets its OWN sneak attack on the first ray.
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire." - Jaya Ballard, task mage
STFUitP
-
2007-10-09, 02:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
You know, reading the excerpt on Precision damage has convinced me that they should eliminate precision damage in 4th ed.
Rogues should simply get the Backstab ability, which gives them extra damage whenever they flank an enemy. Period. No crazy restrictions. Just extra damage.
Rangers (who are killing the Scout and taking their abilities) should get the Skirmish ability, which gives them extra damage whenever they or their mount move at least 10 feet before they make their attack. It will progress half as fast as Sneak Attack. Again, no other restrictions.
Anyway, that's my perfect world situation for the Striker classes.
-
2007-10-09, 03:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Yes.
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
The problem with tying the rogue's extra damage to flanking is that doing so would prevent it from being applied to, say, a surprise attack by a single rogue, or a sniper shot from a hidden rogue fifteen feet away.
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire." - Jaya Ballard, task mage
STFUitP
-
2007-10-09, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Fairfield, CA
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Wiki - Q&A - FB - LIn - Tw
d20r Compilation PDF - last updated 9.11.14
d20r: Spells (I-L) - d20r: Spells (H) - d20r: Spells (G) - d20r: Spells (F) - d20r: Spells (E) - d20r: Spells (D) - d20r: Wizard class
-
2007-10-09, 03:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Yes.
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Except that you had to add on to his suggestion to make it work. So my comment on his suggestion is still valid.
(That aside, yes, your addition fixes the problem and makes it a nice mechanic. How do you define 'surprised', though? And what if they're not surprised, but are still incapable of moving or defending themselves?)Last edited by OzymandiasVolt; 2007-10-09 at 03:28 PM.
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire." - Jaya Ballard, task mage
STFUitP
-
2007-10-09, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Fairfield, CA
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Surprised is defined within the SRD as "not having an action during a surprise round." One could also qualify within the same ability that opponents unable to defend themselves are considered flanked for the purposes of precision damage.
So instead of the weird denied Dex to AC/flat-footed/paralyzed/flanked conglomerate mess that Sneak Attack is now, you say the following:
"Whenever a rogue flanks an enemy he adds xd6 damage to his attack rolls. Foes that are surprised or are unable to defend themselves--such as a bound or paralyzed foe, or a foe you attack from hiding or invisibility--are considered flanked for the purposes of this ability. A target without a discernible anatomy (such as an undead, construct, oozes, plant, or incorporeal creature) is not subject to this extra damage."
There. I've just condensed a horrendously worded ability into something a bit easier to understand, is far shorter, and is generally easier to use.
Compare:
Originally Posted by SRD
Sneak Attack
Whenever a rogue flanks an enemy he adds 1d6 damage to his attack rolls, +1d6 damage per two additional rogue levels. Foes that are surprised or are unable to defend themselves--such as a bound or paralyzed foe, or a foe you attack from hiding or invisibility--are considered flanked for the purposes of this ability.
A target without a discernible anatomy (such as an undead, construct, oozes, plant, or incorporeal creature) or a target immune to critical hits is not subject to this extra damage. Similarly, a rogue cannot Sneak Attack a foe with concealment, nor can he make a sneak attack with a weapon that does nonlethal damage.
As normal, extra dice of damage are not multiplied on a critical hit.
With a sap or an unarmed strike, a rogue can make a sneak attack that deals nonlethal damage instead of lethal damage.Last edited by Fax Celestis; 2007-10-09 at 03:39 PM.
Wiki - Q&A - FB - LIn - Tw
d20r Compilation PDF - last updated 9.11.14
d20r: Spells (I-L) - d20r: Spells (H) - d20r: Spells (G) - d20r: Spells (F) - d20r: Spells (E) - d20r: Spells (D) - d20r: Wizard class
-
2007-10-09, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
-
2007-10-09, 03:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Yes.
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Shiny! Mind if I borrow-with-no-intention-of-returning it?
"Of course you should fight fire with fire. You should fight everything with fire." - Jaya Ballard, task mage
STFUitP
-
2007-10-09, 03:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Fairfield, CA
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Go right ahead. I wouldn't do it otherwise. :P
Wiki - Q&A - FB - LIn - Tw
d20r Compilation PDF - last updated 9.11.14
d20r: Spells (I-L) - d20r: Spells (H) - d20r: Spells (G) - d20r: Spells (F) - d20r: Spells (E) - d20r: Spells (D) - d20r: Wizard class
-
2007-10-09, 03:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Australia, mate :P
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
rules compendium = one last money grab by wizards.
by the table of contents this is a collection of the most obscure or complex rules in D&D, which gaming groups have either ignored for a long time due to their obscureness or come to their own conclusions about how to use it at their table.
the only people who would gain value from this are RPGA players who would have to run off these interpretations of the rules during organized play.
a better option for a book might have been "the best of 3.5" and throw some of the most popular classes, feats, spells and items from all of 3.5 into a single book. its not like such a book is going to negatively impact sales of the original source at this point.Last edited by Jarlax; 2007-10-09 at 03:51 PM.
-
2007-10-09, 03:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
-
2007-10-09, 03:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Fairfield, CA
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Actually, you can "borrow" my revised sneak attack on one condition: you read the Medium in my sig and tell me what you think.
Wiki - Q&A - FB - LIn - Tw
d20r Compilation PDF - last updated 9.11.14
d20r: Spells (I-L) - d20r: Spells (H) - d20r: Spells (G) - d20r: Spells (F) - d20r: Spells (E) - d20r: Spells (D) - d20r: Wizard class
-
2007-10-09, 03:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Yep. "Flanked" is much easier to understand than "having lost their dexterity bonus to their AC regardless of whether they had such a bonus to begin with".
Also, is "flat footed" even a word? Other than applying to a medical condition, that is...
Oh and no, I have no desire whatsoever to buy what is effectively an errata book. Plenty of errata on the internet, and plenty of homebrew suggestions that are at times better than what WOTC comes up with.Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2007-10-09, 04:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: Opinions on the Rules Compendium
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2007-10-09, 04:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007