Results 31 to 60 of 1130
-
2013-05-05, 02:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
DM'ing Trouble In Orlane IC | OOC
Stick figure character portraits I've made for myself and others.
"I think most gamemasters would agree that their world functions significantly more smoothly before the PCs ever show up." -
-
2013-05-05, 02:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Not a houserule. The Dispel seed cares not for your "can't be dispelled" clauses. In fact, it even works on (Su).
-
2013-05-05, 02:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Florida, USA
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
I didn't realize the eyepatch was on the wrong eye, but I was pretty much certain it was an illusion by the second panel. Things were just moving way too fast.
But if things had gone on more for more than a page or so, we would have felt jipped when it turned out to be an illusion, so this was really the best way for it to go.Wolfen Houndog - The World in Revolt (4e)
The Mythic Warrior, a 3.5 base class that severs limbs and sunders armor
The Nameless One, converted to 3.5 and 5e
-
2013-05-05, 02:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Holy everloving crap. Giant you brilliant bastard. I'm sorry if I'm cursing more than this forum generally allows, but... hooooooly crap.
Also, the 'there's no way this is an illusion you foolish epileptic tree-huggers' crowd? Suck it.
-
2013-05-05, 02:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
That was a neat bit of storytelling explaining how the Order is still a threat, how the Order can beat Xykon, and yet still be a fake-out. The next time they fight him, I'm willing to bet this is how it goes before complications set in.i
-
2013-05-05, 02:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Internets
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Also, if I may say, it's so adorable that Roy hallucinates Xykon calling him by name. He really wants the guy to acknowledge him, doesn't he?
-
2013-05-05, 02:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
this comic also makes you wonder how much of 885 happened as well (ie when did the runes activate)
although the party order suggests its the second to last panel in 885
-
2013-05-05, 02:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Why would Roy think that Redcloak grew his eye back? All he knows is that he had his eye poked out. Since that missing eye has no ingame effect, he probably never gave it thought again and didn't stop to consider whether Redcloak would regenerate it or not. Also, notice that not only is the eyepatch on the wrong eye, but the phylactery is wrong. Redcloak has a square shaped holy symbol now.
-
2013-05-05, 02:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
1) I went back and checked. Obviously it's the Giant's comic, and he can write whatever he wants. But we all make mistakes, and in this instance he has made a mistake. Elan, V and Durkon all see Redcloak cast disintegrate on Hinjo (a 7th level spell), so they would have known he was of a sufficiently high level to use regeneration. In addition I'm not sure what level of summoning he needed for that Kraken, but I'm thinking that would be pretty high too. EDIT- and on checking it is also level 7, http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/summonMonsterVII.htm
2) No, the regular rules do not allow Superb Dispelling to dispel forcecage. If Rich wants to let it work in his comic, that's his business. I am just explaining that the regular rules simply don't support it, something others have also backed up.Last edited by Mage Paradox; 2013-05-05 at 02:41 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 02:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Phew. For a moment there, I thought Rich had written the comic while drunk or something...
Last edited by Chess Tyrant; 2013-05-05 at 02:41 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 02:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Started reading OOTS when it was like in it's 200-ish.
First time ever I have an urge to tell some unrelated person about all this.
-
2013-05-05, 02:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
I'm not sure how Redcloak's eyepatch (wrong eye/Right-Eye or not) is explained if the illusion is drawn from their memories -- perhaps were they informed of Redcloak's change in physical appearance through the Resistance-Hinjo-Order Sending network (as well as Vaarsuvius and O-chul's original accounts of how he lost it), offscreen? And if that's the case, and they should also know that Redcloak is using the new amulet, they may also be assuming that if Redcloak and Xykon were in the ziggurat at all at this point, they'd have already found the phylactery and Redcloak would have re-introduced the old amulet/phylactery back into his attire, rather than sticking with the new square one? The Order wouldn't know about the spat they had regarding that.
These are some big jumps I'm making about the Order's knowledge, though. If it's Girard-crafted, the spell may be Epic and work in an entirely different way.
Also, if I may say, it's so adorable that Roy hallucinates Xykon calling him by name. He really wants the guy to acknowledge him, doesn't he?
-
2013-05-05, 02:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Given Belkar "died" I wonder what his illusion is feeding him?
Bob
-
2013-05-05, 02:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
-
2013-05-05, 02:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Western Maryland
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Looks like all the people who suspected the runes were casting an illusion and that Xykon wasn't actually there were in fact correct. Very nice twist. Shame it really didn't happen though, would have been a pretty epic way to beat down Xykon for a little while(until he regenerates at his phylactery).
-
2013-05-05, 02:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
@ Mage Paradaox:
The thing with superd dispelling is not that simple. The discussion about the rules it uses is ancient. The fact that for some reason the EXAMPLE of a spell called Super Dispelling listed in SRD/ELH simply states it works like Dispel Magic doesn't change two facts:
1) It's based on the Dispel Seed which contradicts your statement and therefore
2) It's literally IMPOSSIBLE to make a Superb Dispelling spell that doesn't dispel Forcecage without using house rules.
-
2013-05-05, 02:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
What makes you think that Roy, Elan, and Haley even have the cleric's spell list memorized in the first place? All they know is that he got his eye poked out because their friend told them so. They almost certainly don't know how an epic spell like superb dispelling would work. Considering that everything they are seeing is an illusion based on the character's perception...rules lawyering is even less useful than usual.
There are a lot of options here. Claiming that the author made a mistake simply because it doesn't match up with your personal interpretation is obnoxious.Last edited by Anteros; 2013-05-05 at 02:50 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 02:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
First, it's a 6th level Wizard spell. Now, who, of the four characters here, do you think has enough ranks in Knowledge (Religion) to know that the spell is a higher level for clerics using it from the Destruction domain than it is for Vaarsuvius, their teammate, who uses it all the time? (Answer: None of them.)
And second, don't tell me I made a mistake in my own comic. I could not give one good goddamn what the rules say about anything. There are no mistakes, because there are no rules. NONE. No, not even that one. Further, I do not care what you think is a "reasonable" assumption for them to have made. This is the assumption they DID make. Period. End of discussion.Rich Burlew
Now Available: 2023 OOTS Holiday Ornament plus a big pile of new t-shirt designs (that you can also get on mugs and stuff)!
~~You can also support The Order of the Stick and the GITP forum at Patreon.~~
-
2013-05-05, 02:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Alright, the runes show the victims what they want to see. Either it takes a few rounds of perception checks to work or it gets activated by a trigger. So, in Roy's case, they stop fooling around with the LG and suddenly fight Xykon and Roy heroically takes Xykon out singlehandedly, while losing the one member of his team he both wanted and expected to die anyway.
Haley is probably seeing a vision of Durkula being devamped then blowing the gates and thwarting Xykon before running off with Elan to shtoink like bunnies. Elan is probably seeing Roy congratulating him and finally acknowledging that they couldn't have beaten Xykon without him, before running off with Haley to shtoink like bunnies.
Belkar is a bit tougher. He's probably getting to take out Durkon himself, then retiring at a ripe old age with the cat to enjoy more milk, woman and gold than he knows what to do with.
-
2013-05-05, 02:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
That's simply not true. This post explains it well:
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showp...5&postcount=94
-
2013-05-05, 02:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Wow, I almost had a heart attack when Belkar and Xykon both died in the course of two pages. I was thinking "no way, Belkar's death deserves at least a 10-page lead-up, and Xykon's should get at least fifty!". Then I got to the last panel...
and didn't understand what had happened, so I came to the forums and now I get it. :P
By the way, Xykon saying Roy's name was a nice touch.
P.S. Now that I've read it the second time, the illusion sequence gets progressively more purple-hued as the comic goes along. Subtle, but effective. Well done, Giant.
P.P.S. Mr. Scruffy dying in the 8th panel may be the saddest thing ever.Last edited by Wonton; 2013-05-05 at 02:55 AM.
Rules that supersede Rule 0:
Rule -1: You're all there to have fun. The GM and the players should never do anything that would limit people's fun, for any in-game or real-life reason.
Rule -0.5 (corollary): That means that if someone's fun is getting in the way of other people's fun, that person needs to change how they're playing.
-
2013-05-05, 02:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Here.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Ha! Oh man, when I saw he had the eyepatch I was sure they were real after all, but nope! Well played, Rich. Well played.
In retrospect, missing Blackwing should have been the giveaway. Everyone forgets about V's familiar, so of course the Order did.Last edited by DaggerPen; 2013-05-05 at 02:50 AM.
-
2013-05-05, 02:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
So is Mr Scruffy under the effects of the illusion as well?
-
2013-05-05, 02:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- California
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
The runes actually activate inbetween panels 4 and 5 of 886. Note the pallette swap at that point. So they are actually fighting Xykon, but Belkar isn't dead.
I wonder: is Xykon under the effect of the runes too?
-
2013-05-05, 02:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Rules that supersede Rule 0:
Rule -1: You're all there to have fun. The GM and the players should never do anything that would limit people's fun, for any in-game or real-life reason.
Rule -0.5 (corollary): That means that if someone's fun is getting in the way of other people's fun, that person needs to change how they're playing.
-
2013-05-05, 02:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- empty space
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
They also think Vaarsuvius is undamaged.
I like semicolons; they make me feel smart.
-
2013-05-05, 02:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
The eye-patch on the wrong eye was pretty brilliant. I'd never notice it without being told because I am so used to seeing sprites flipped.
So, I guess the fake Redcloak is the true wrong-eye.
I have to give props to the giant. While I was reading the dialogue, I had a feeling something was amiss. The illusory Xykon and Redcloak just don't have the same "voice" as the real ones. RC in particular talks just like he did in the dungeon of Dorukan, which makes since because the Order hasn't had much face-to-face contact with him since then. That didn't stop me from audibly gasping at Belkar's and then Xykno's death before the reveal.
I'm left puzzled what the fake RC was referring to when he says that Xykon "already used that line" though.
-
2013-05-05, 02:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
The Author responded to my initial remark about how it "seems like an error" by saying that the Order do not have any idea Redcloak is able to cast level 7 Cleric Spells. Redcloak has cast two level 7 Cleric spells in front of them though (one of which is in the general Cleric pool, not the Destruction Domain), so the remark the author made in response to my post technically was wrong, in the sense that the order have as much reason to think Redcloak is able to cast level 7 spells as they do to think he's missing an eye. Like I said, it's his comic, he can give whatever explanation he likes. I suspect when he wrote his reply he had simply forgotten those 2 instances.
-
2013-05-05, 02:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
It doesn't explain two things: 1) why it has correct Spellcraft DC for a Dispel Seed and 2) where is the mitigating factor for not having all the features of a Dispel Seed.
But if you want to go that way, the rules state simply that those are only examples of spells listed that STILL need to be researched. Since by the rules of researching and creating epic spells you cannot invent a Superb Dispelling spell without all the perks of Dispel Seed and without any house ruled mitigating factors, the only Superb Dispelling spell Xykon can research is one that dispels Forcecage.
-
2013-05-05, 02:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Gender
Re: OOTS #886 - The Discussion Thread
Great strip. Just...great. Before the update, I was pretty much torn on the whole Illusion/non-Illusion debate. When I say Reddie with his eyepatch, and not remembering the eye he lost, I thought, "Wow, real". Elan's song in the second panel made me doubt a little, but mostly made me laugh. When Belkar got toasted, I was still thinking it could be real, as I've long thought it will be Xykon who does for him. But when Mr. Scruffy was so causually and brutally snuffed out...then the pedulum swung. It had to be an illusion. Or at least, I was really hoping so!
(by the way, the art in the 6th panel is awesome.)
So when the Order started winning in the second page...yeah, pretty clear that it was not real! Great last frame.
(by the way, in Roy's list of people he's avenging, he starts with his Dad's master, but there is no mention of his master's son. I know the list is hardly exhaustive, but even so, worth noting, I thought.)Last edited by sam79; 2013-05-05 at 03:05 AM.
The prison was full of British officers who had sworn to die, rather than be captured.
Avatar by Rich Burlew: The Giant Stuck It To Me!