Results 721 to 750 of 1472
Thread: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
-
2020-09-15, 03:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
No, we do not. We follow the evidence. With explicit indication that MitD has no cleric levels, and no evidence he has any other kind of level, we draw the line at not assuming he has anything there is no evidence he has. Could Rich have decided MitD was an ugly goblin/minortaur/human/etc. with 20 levels of sorcerer? Sure, but then Rich would not assure us we can figure out that he is a goblin/minortaur/human/etc because at that point, all the clues are rendered useless by the fact they have class levels that have never been hinted at.
This is not true. The girl is clearly disgusted, probably about to throw up.
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-15 at 03:59 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-15, 04:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
That's what I meant. I am, after all, one of the folks feeling that way.
I forget. Are the kids, on average, taking it better than the adults?
I still feel that scene is our best hint. Surely not many creatures can account for 'passive visual ability with a wide range of effects and acquired immunity' (in the revisiting goblins' case).
-
2020-09-15, 06:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
-
2020-09-16, 06:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Canadia
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I was thinking about the Glabrezu, and noticed a couple of interesting things (This may have been brought this up before, though I don't recall seeing it).
In the fluff for the 2E version of the Glabrezu, it notes that Glabrezu communicate using telepathy. Since SoD is in the past, is it possible the MitD was a 2E version that then later changed to 3E?
Additionally, as early as 3E Draegloth are creatures that are created by the unholy union of a Glabrezu and a Drow high priestess, which shows that they can reproduce. Now whether they can definitively produce other Glabrezu is not stated anywhere that I have found, but this does show that they have the capacity to be parents.
-
2020-09-16, 07:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-16, 09:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Snohomish, Washington
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I think that it might be worthwhile to circle back to the circus scene for some further discussion. That seems to be the primary objection to any new candidate for MitD.
Why do I think it's worthwhile? Because there seems to be a fixation that the effect is nausea, even though after rereading the section, I noted that there are clearly two characters in the strip that do not characterize it that way. In fact the only one who is definitely nauseous is the one losing his lunch on panel 1 of page 84 of SoD. The child in the center says that she feels funny looking at it, which isn't the same as nausea - it could indicate discomfort or being unsettled too.
So, the two characters commenting on it:
On page 84 of SoD, in panel 2, the ringmaster states "Look on in awe and terror folks..." Not exactly how I would expect something which induces nausea to be introduced. Terror.
On page 85 of SoD, in panel 2, Right-Eye states "Almost everyone else who spends a silver piece to get into the sideshow recoils in abject horror at the sight of you..." Again, not nausea. Horror.
If MitD had been described as grotesque nausea might fit, maybe. But terror and horror definitely suggest fear. Not nausea. And this is coming from two characters, in the comic, describing the expected and actual reaction to MitD's appearance.
I think that is a much stronger indication of what the reaction to MitD actually is than any speculation based on faces.
Admittedly, Xykon describes MitD as ugly later in the book, but he's also undead and couldn't be fearful or nauseated, so his reaction is kind of moot if we're talking about one of those two effects.
-
2020-09-16, 09:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
-
2020-09-16, 09:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Ehh... I feel you're stretching the little girl's statement somewhat. I feel like a kid that finds something scary or unsettling would say so rather than say a longer statement like that. Additionally, she is holding her hands over her stomach. If she was primarily scared, she would probably be hugging her mom or at least be closer to her or put her hands over her eyes. That is, her body language seems to indicate she's talking about an upset stomach.
mew
-
2020-09-17, 04:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
-
2020-09-17, 09:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Snohomish, Washington
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
If anything, it would suggest a horrific or unsettling appearance. Again horror, not nausea. As confirmed by both Right-Eye and the ringmaster.
Only one is reacting with what could be considered nausea. Out of over a dozen. That suggests pretty strongly that it isn't a nausea effect. A crowd reacting to an extremely horrific, unsettling, or grotesque appearance could be illustrated in the manner shown. Again horror, which is fear, not nausea.
Look at it from a game mechanic standpoint too: We've got a bench full of commoners and some goblins, plus Right-Eye and the wizardy guy (and possibly a warrior-type in the second row). Does it make sense that only one of those individuals failed their save by enough to be nauseated?
Assuming that we're talking about an effect that does one thing if you fail the save, and another if you fail it by a higher amount. We're talking 10+ of them. Even if they had to roll a 6 or better (say a DC of 11 that does something more if they fail by 5) to not be nauseous (.25 chance of failure each), there's still a very hefty chance that multiple will fail and be affected. Even more so if the number is more realistic for a creature of the power level MitD is believed to have, such as 13+ or 16+. Crunch the numbers if you don't believe me.
Again, this is a fear effect, probably from MitD being hideous or grotesque.
-
2020-09-17, 09:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I too, like Ruck, would like to see where this idea that there is "a fixation" is coming from. It is weird to start an honest discussion about a topic with an ad hominem.
That would be telling instead of showing, and ignoring what the showing is depicting. The depictions are NOT consistent with fear: no white faces, no urinating on themselves, no running away, no other non-ambiguous indication that any of these people are in fear. The depiction is consistent with something stomach-churning, vomit-inducing.
I count at at least three. And I count 0 that are explicitly fear-looking. The one hiding his eyes could go either way. The rest are in various states of shock that could mean any number of emotions overwhelming them in the moment.
As to the actual words said, "Horrible" doesn't generally mean "causes horror", it means "ugly" (e.g. "that is a horrible haircut" doesn't mean "small children are going to run away from you", it means "small children are going to laugh at you"). And when used with that meaning, the counterpoint "And yet... beautiful" makes sense, since they are antonyms when "horrible" is using its "ugly" definition.
No, you are assuming your conclusion. 3 nausea depictions, 0 explicit fear depictions, and the rest are either neutral or could go either way. The depiction is far more aligned with disgust than it is with horror.
I see no reason to assume MitD has an actual mechanic to cause either. I think it is quite clear a clue depicting what he looks like, not what passive aura he has. He might have one, but equally, he might not.
Again, I see no reason to assume this.
No it is not. A hideous or grotesque image doesn't cause fear, it causes disgust, as depicted.
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-17 at 10:28 AM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-17, 10:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Snohomish, Washington
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Probably because nearly every new proposal gets shot down by the Circus Scene. And the insistence that it's a nausea effect. That's why I think there is a fixation on it.
One thing that those who believe insist that it is a nausea effect have not explained is why Right-Eye and the Ringmaster describe the reactions (expected and actual) as "awe and terror" and "recoils in abject horror." This is not one, but TWO different characters describing it.
Follow the evidence. These are Rich's own words that the characters are saying.
I've watched time and again many very good proposals refused simply because of the insistence that it doesn't fit causing nausea or sickness in the circus scene.
So, please account for the Ringmaster and Right-Eye's description of the reactions and I will gladly withdraw my comment regarding fixation. If these statements (note the plural - both of them) cannot be refuted in a credible manner, I think my point is made. Follow the evidence.
Please lay it out for me how those two quotes could possibly both be describing something that causes nausea or sickness without also invoking fear.
-
2020-09-17, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Which is a weird statement to make, because most proposals lately have had problems with strength and size - to the point where we just went through a rather contentious voting to adjust our approach to such creatures.
I do follow the evidence, and I trust what is shown more than what it is said, under the "show, don't tell" best practice for storytelling. Especially when one of them is the ringmaster who thought he could also pass a dwarf woman as the amazing bearded woman, so his words are easily explained as "building up to disappointment". If what people say (and are known to misrepresent) does not match what is depicted, I trust what is depicted. And that's not even mentioning that both Xykon and the public's words suggest ugliness, not horror, so I could even point out that not even in speech do all characters agree on the best way to describe MitD.
Already have - they don't trump the actual shown, drawn evidence that what MitD causes is not fear but vomit-inducing, stomach-churning nausea.
No, instead what I will do is take note of the fact you are acknowledging and standing by your offensive characterisation of my position and therefore not talk to you further.
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-17 at 01:02 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-17, 11:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I mean, fear is known to cause nausea. I think its a fair question to ask how youre distinguishing between directly inducing nausea and fear inducing nausea. Especially because something gross cant really be described as beautiful, but something terrifying can.
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 11:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Fear causes a large number of involuntary reactions. I described a few of them in my first post. Fear, however, is not usually depicted in graphic form with vomiting, even if you can find "nausea" in laundry lists of biological effects of fear. On the other hand, nausea can be caused by disgust, and in the absence of any other fear consequences, I don't see why we'd conclude "fear caused them nausea, but not any of the other biological or classic depictions of fear" rather than the far more parsimonious "looking at MitD causes nausea, but not outright fear".
Something gross like a mould infestation can be both stomach-churning and be beautiful in terms of its colours or patterns. I find it as likely that something vomit inducing can be described as beautiful as something horror inducing - which is to say, not very likely, but can picture a handful of rare examples for both.
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-17 at 11:51 AM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-17, 11:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
-
2020-09-17, 11:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Location
- South France
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
There was a quote that I saw a while back that said that "gothic literature makes a distinction between terror and horror. Terror is the sense of dread and apprehension that precedes an experience, horror is the sense of revulsion after an experience." The two words may seem synonymous, but they are very distinct when put into a time frame.
It's "locksmith of LOVE!" not "LO!"
-
2020-09-17, 11:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- The sticks
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Its an interesting question. It certainly seems like fiends reproducing biologically would cause problems for the Stickverse cosmology, but the existence of Tieflings and Cambions (at least, in D&D. Citation needed for OotS) makes clear demons and devils can at least be *part* of the reproduction process. Plus, Slaads are outsiders and reproduce biologically (albeit in a really convoluted way) and it seems to be fine.
Edit - Also, Glasya is the daughter of Asmodeus and I can't find any reference to her as a Cambion, just a devil. Of course, maybe she's adopted rather than biological.Last edited by Crusher; 2020-09-17 at 11:57 AM.
"You are what you do. Choose again and change." - Miles Vorkosigan
-
2020-09-17, 11:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I concede the point on the mold, mostly out of a desire to get the image out of my head. But i disagree about fear commonly being portrayed with vomiting. Its generally used as the more persistent fear's counterpart to the jump scare pants wetting, at least in the media that im familiar with.
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 11:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I honestly cannot think of a single example. Is there any I missed, in OotS or other easily accessible webcomics? We
sawheard the CPPD rookie vomit at the entrail trail left by Nale - but again, that's nausea, not fear - and I can think of a handful of similar moments in other webcomics (including the CSI parody in Schlock Mercenary, in similar circumstances), but when has a comic strip depicted fear with vomiting?
(Please don't ask me to go out to buy Amazing SpiderMan #34726 from my local retailer, though)
GWLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-17 at 12:09 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-17, 12:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
In webcomics? not off hand, sorry. I think Questionable Content had a couple scenes of somebody dealing with severe fear and anxiety causing vomiting, but theres like 3000 pages of that, and filtering through them to find it would take a while. Having said that, i dont read very many webcomics, so i am probably not a particularly good source for that, in particular.
No, i was thinking more like books, where a character would emphasize their fear by describing their nausea, or TV shows, where a character would be anxious and afraid about something and running to the bathroom or, if it was a comedy, puking on somebody.
Also, as a personal anecdote, i get EXTREMELY nauseous whenever im having a fear response (usually to spiders). I have enough self control that i dont actually lose it every time i see a daddy longlegs or whatever, but if i were to look over and see, say, a wolf spider on my shoulder, i would absolutely throw up almost on the spot.“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 12:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
See, I understand that to describe more the anxiety than the fear. Yes, you can obviously have both at the same time, but while I acknowledge that fear can cause nausea, I'm referring to how it is usually depicted. And honestly, even trying to think of a book where that is the case, I can dredge maybe a couple of moments where "it's the smell" or because of a disgusting image, not the fear itself. They can go hand in hand, certainly, but when it comes to shorthand trope depictions, vomit is not what I generally see being a fear characteristic, sorry.
(To be clear, anxiety as usually depicted need not be caused by fear itself, but by the expectation that fear is coming - i.e. that you will be in fear/danger/etc, rather than those feeling themselves, so I consider it a separate feeling and indeed one that should precede fear rather than be caused by it)
Please do not misunderstand me - I am by no means suggesting that fear cannot cause nausea. I am quite aware it can. My argument instead rests on two assertions: (1) that vomiting is not usually the way a comic depicts fear - vomiting indicates, depending on context, disgust or some other cause of nausea (very commonly drunkness) and (2) that in absence of other generally recognized indications of fear (urination might be hard for PG-13 to depict, but say sweating; either running or being stuck in place incapable of moving; fainting; pale faces... which admittedly I'm not sure are compatible with OotS style, but Rich surprises me there often), it feels implausible that Rich was trying to depict fear, while it feels very likely that he was depicting disgust.
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-09-17 at 12:40 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2020-09-17, 02:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
-
2020-09-17, 02:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 02:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Yea, the only reason this gets to be in the discussion is that the Giant likes these 'rule vs reality' punchlines. But he uses it as punchlines, not a joke several years in the making nor a justifiable red herring.
Also, of all the words to describe the circus reactions, 'diverse' is likely the best. "Beautiful" aside, you have what looks like surprise, fear, puking, disgust, unspecified weirdness and, in the case of repeat customers, indifference.
On another consideration, this just hit me: we have two cases of stated recognition (positive or negative): one wizard has stated they don't recognize it, one cleric has stated they do. This might be reaching, on several layers (Redcloack's statement of recognition might not be a hint but a writer's permission to the following statement, and the wizard's half of the argument is not mechanically absolute), but what if this is a hint to type?
If Redcloack recognizes it (and it's a hint) it is the subject of one of clerics' class skill Knowledges: Arcana, Religion, History, Planes. History has no monster subjects. Arcana you would expect the wizard to have (who has everything as a class skill, so that's weak, but of all the knowledges to neglect, that's the least likely). This leaves us with Religion and Planes: Undead, Elementals and Outsiders.
On a third note, I think it is important that Ochul calls the MitD a good man rather than a good person. It should mean that whatever the species, it is gendered. Even if Ochul merely calls him that because of MitD's preference, "good boy" would be more likely (since, besides being obviously a kid, the MitD refers, for example, to their club's rule as "no girls allowed", indicating that he sees himself as a kid, and if Ochul picked up his preference so would he).
-
2020-09-17, 03:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
Apologies if you already know this, but in American English, calling somebody a "good boy/girl" is pretty condescending. Its what we typically use to give positive verbal reinforcement to pets. When applied to a person, it almost always implies a lack of maturity relative to your age, and while this is not always intended to be offensive, its never really used in a fully positive context. It is very rarely actually stated directly to children, mostly because of the pet thing, and partly because it establishes an "i am older and therefore superior to you" undercurrent to what is supposed to be a compliment.
Last edited by Keltest; 2020-09-17 at 03:05 PM.
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 03:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
-
2020-09-17, 03:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2020-09-17, 03:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One
I strongly suspect Good man would be the preferred choice of words even when addressing a being with no gender.
Last edited by Hardcore; 2020-09-22 at 04:48 PM.
-
2020-09-17, 03:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: MitD XV: The Other Dark One