Results 241 to 270 of 609
-
2021-02-26, 03:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by hamishspence; 2021-02-26 at 03:19 PM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2021-02-26, 03:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Spoiler: SoDIn Eugene's conversation with Right-Eye he says he dropped the blood oath because his family was more important than adventuring and he encourages Right-Eye to settle down.
So ironically while that caused him to miss Roy's soccer game and widen the rift between the two, Eugene's intention for dropping the quest is at least Good-aligned.
-
2021-02-26, 03:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Beverly, MA, USA
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
SpoilerSure, but that was implied to be more of a last-minute-noticing thingy (sorry, I’m bad with words today). The page doesn’t read like the judgment is being interrupted in the middle; it reads like the deva was practically done and then noticed that one outstanding detail. It’s tough to read that page as “Eugene was still likely to be kicked out by something else unrelated to his Blood Oath.”Number of Character Appearances VII - To Absent Friends
Currently playing a level 20 aasimar necromancer named Zebulun Salathiel and a level 9 goliath diviner named Lo-Kag.
-
2021-02-26, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
- Not that Girard has any right to complain, but he seemed to think Soon would go after him over some "Greater Good" excuse.
- Soon prioritized sealing the Gate over not only his own, but also Kraagor's life, and the flashback says that this inflamed years of preexisting resentments.
- We know for a fact that the Sapphire Guard was willing to massacre entire innocent goblin villages just because a few goblin priests carrying out a reckless plan happened to live there.
You can argue that these deeds were necessary, but they don't make him look great.
-
2021-02-26, 03:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2020
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
I would say we have copious amounts of evidence that he did things that do not befit a LG man, and things like his superiority complex as a wizard (
) or abandoning responsibility after responsibility because he got bored were not things he picked up when he grew old or only did on the rare occasion.Spoiler: Originin Origin we learn that he apparently did not talk to his one and only son for three years due to Roy choosing a class he deemed inferior
That he is apparently eligible to enter Celestia is incredibly confusing and contradicts basically everything we know about him, especially since we also know that if big enough, a single mistake can easily constitute the difference between LG and TN.Last edited by Metastachydium; 2021-02-26 at 03:33 PM.
-
2021-02-26, 04:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Well said.
It's very human to judge people as if what we know of them represents everything about them, because we're first-person storytellers. And there are lots of good reasons - such as two-faced people, or our non-omniscience and limited lifespan to gather data. But as with any quick-and-dirty process it's prone to error, and it's very "hackable".
If I show you every good thing Belkar has ever done and leave out the rest, you might think him a saint. I suspect this will come into play when Minrah grieves for his death, not having seen most of his awful deeds.
If I do the converse with Roy, you might think he's a horrible person. And again, I suspect this will come into play with Minrah - who may be tempted to surreptitiously cast Detect Evil when she sees the party's apathy and joking about Belkar's death.
Be careful of how much data you take in from people* who routinely describe others in a manner that's reminiscent of The Blind Men And The Elephant. Judging others based on Why They're Evil (or Good), let alone a single instance thereof, is like judging "what happened" in an event based on a single photo.
* - I didn't want to leave any doubt - I don't mean this with respect to anyone here, because I don't believe it applies to anyone here. This is just general old-man-rambling-with-unwanted-advice. (^_^)°Last edited by arimareiji; 2021-02-26 at 04:18 PM. Reason: adding in "routinely" and a footnote, because the sentence was poorly-worded.
-
2021-02-26, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Girard also bet that Soon who violate his Oath under twelve weeks' time. The man did not know Soon as much as he thought.
We have no context for this resenments though.
EDIT: Okay, we do have some context: Girard didn't appreciate having to deal with all the mapmaking duties.
This attack happened 34 years ago (Source: SOD page 9) and Soon passed command of the SG back when Shojo was a little boy. Granted the chronology is wonky since only sixty-six/-seven years are supposed to have passed since Mijung's death and Shojo looks like an octegenarian, but it seems like soon wasn't in command at the timeLast edited by Fyraltari; 2021-02-26 at 04:19 PM.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2021-02-26, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- In a castle under the sea
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
PEDANTRY ALERT
Limbo's technically a separate plane in the D&D cosmology, not the antechamber to the afterlife. Moreover, in Dante's Inferno, Limbo was specifically the antechamber to hell. Discussing the broader meaning of Limbo would cross the line from arguably-just-literature* into no-that's-definitely-religion, but I think it's safe to say Limbo isn't ever an entrance into heaven.
*And I will make that argument if I have to.
Nonetheless, she let [Roy] in anyway because he was trying to live up to the tenants of law and good and , for a mortal, that is enough.
I disagree. What we see of Eugene isn't his whole life, but it does likely indicate how he tends to act. We have evidence supporting this thanks to Roy's reactions to Eugene's actions, which indicate that the way he acts on-panel is how he acted off-panel while he was alive. And also on-panel while he was alive, for that matter.
It's your position that has no evidence, because it relies entirely on pointing at places we have no evidence and saying that all of Eugene's LG actions happened there, and that we can't prove otherwise. Granted, those are decade-sized holes, but we have zero reason to think the contents of those holes are radically different than the brief flashbacks we've seen in between.
-
2021-02-26, 05:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
And yet the Cosmos, when his whole life was over depostied him at the doorstep of Celestia.
I am back to "you can be LG and a jerk at the same time" since it fits the author's assignment of alignment.
I do, however, take bunsen_h's point: since he's been pulling shenanigans since he got put on hold, he may warrant a second review and get slapped with "Dude, you just ain't lawful" and sent on his merry way. But that's in the future, not now, and in any case it's after the blood oath is completed by his offspring. I get the idea that he's in some kind of odd purgatory equivalent, in that he knows that he Can't Get In and he has to watch as his offspring don't (so far) take care of his unfinished business.
Interesting points, but Girard and the rest hardly know about point 3, all they have is point 2, and your point 1 makes Girard not a credible witness. (And Soon didn't actually do that, did he? No, he didn't)
Your points, however, may get substantially greater support in subsequent strips as we learn more about the Scribblers from Serini - bearing in mind that she's careless with the truth as a habit.
As to this:
Originally Posted by MetastachydiumLast edited by KorvinStarmast; 2021-02-26 at 05:13 PM.
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-02-26, 05:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Just being picky, but ymmv on whether it's "carelessness" per se. Imagine you're watching someone walk toward you, and you expect them to take a straight path because that's the most efficient. Instead, they meander so haphazardly that you think they must be careless or drunk.
Then you get an overhead view, and see the pile of dog crap they avoided at the last moment, the puddle they walked around, the broken glass they picked their way through, etc. Not having a purpose that we expect doesn't mean they don't have one. (^_~)b
As to this:
Maybe the problem is the lens that you are looking through.
-
2021-02-26, 05:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-02-26, 05:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
-
2021-02-26, 05:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
He listed a bunch of characters with neutral alignments, but not necessarily all of them and Eugene was never on that list. I don’t think this means that Eugene wasn’t neutral, if Rich was planning say, a big dramatic emotional scene where Eugene discovers he’s not going to celestia, well maybe he wouldn’t want to say that outright.
Also my opinions on Eugenes alignment: he ain’t good, and he ain’t lawful, I can think of like, two things he’s ever done in his life or afterlife that fit the alignment, first is doing to Blood Oath, which he abandoned, and second, which is imo more good and lawful, is choosing to do right by Sara and Roy at the start of his fatherhood (and convincing Right Eye to give up on revenge), another thing he abandoned in favor of studying magic, something that led to the death of his youngest son.Arrrgh, here be me extended sig!
-
2021-02-26, 06:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Spoiler: Start of DarknessIt's not clear how far the Deva got through his review. Eugene asks "So... am I good here, or what?" and the Deva replies "That's what I'm trying to determine" and proceeds to look at the record. He notes a few fairly minor problems, then notices the outstanding Blood Oath of Vengeance. Was the check for Eugene being Lawful also under review at that point? -- the "am I good here" being ambiguous, regarding both alignment and being satisfactory. And his lying right at that point, claiming that he'd completed the Oath, would have been a new black mark.
-
2021-02-26, 06:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Hungary
- Gender
-
2021-02-26, 07:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
If memory serves, The Giant's quote is that Eugene had written "Lawful Good" on his character sheet, so he was sent to Celestia for his initial interview. Beyond that, we know the devas didn't immediately kick him somewhere else, so he at least has a case for LG.
Given his track record of abandoning his commitments, I think he's at best going to Bytopia. More likely somewhere further south.
-
2021-02-26, 07:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
It's likely Girard was projecting, if subconsciously. He would've acted similarly to the accusations he was throwing at Soon. It's telling even Haley who is firmly in Chaotic showed frustration at Girard's inability to understand Lawful folk. I think they really didn't take the time to know each other.
I suspect that if Soon died instead of Kraagor, then Girard might've driven a wedge between himself and the other Scribblers if he was insensitive about it.
As for the mapmaking duties, I think it's cause he was a ranger. And yeah, Soon was dead by the time Ronjo became the new leader of the Sapphire Guard and the troubles began with the arisocracy and so on.
-
2021-02-26, 07:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
The Giant was specifically talking about Roy, but I think it still fits:
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2021-02-26, 07:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
I've been saying that I'm waiting for something like this to happen. I can't square Eugene's alignment as Lawful Good with the selfish, irresponsible jerk who has nothing but disdain for the people he's supposed to have the most obligation toward, and every time we've seen in him on panel in life or death he's acted this way. He reads much more like True Neutral to me, not actively evil but totally selfish and self-involved.
-
2021-02-26, 08:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
The problem with that point of view is that Eugene's life is an entire pizza, and you are basing your judgment on a slice or two.
But Eugene isn't off the hook, LG jerk being a valid status or not.
The point that the review was never completed (thank you bunsen_h) isn't going to be good for Eugene if he really thinks that he's getting to Celestia, since after the review and his being put on hold, he's been up to some questionable shenanigans.
Given that the story isn't over yet, I don't get this rush to judgment (yeah, pun intended).Last edited by KorvinStarmast; 2021-02-26 at 08:10 PM.
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-02-26, 08:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
-
2021-02-26, 08:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
A few points:
- just because she considers it her own doesn't make it so.
- Law enforcement doesn't use tranquilizers and the like for a reason. There are reasons baton's (of course Serini did use the equivilent of a baton later, for no good reason), pepper spray and tasers are preferred - probably mostly because they are less dangerous and more harmful than tranquilizers. Even then, those means aren't usually the first point of call - usually warnings and such come first. Some people would even see these less harmful measure (like tasers) as too brutal.
- Even if the area was somehow Serini's personal property, that still doesn't justify kidnapping. If you drugged and kidnapped people on your property I don't think that would be justified.
But as I've said before, I could almost accept that Serini reluctantly kidnapped her victims because it was the only possible way she had to accomplish some greater goal. But if that was the case one might expect her to be remorseful or apologetic - "I'm sorry, i know it'snot ok to drug and kidnap people but I needed to do it because...". Instead, she went out of her way to mock her victims, teasing them with possible freedom.
Again, then why taunt her victims?
Your mileage may vary on whether it is or not. Since Lion King was released corporal punishment became illegal in my country, so I suppose society may look at it as the sort of thing which was ok by the standards of its time, but probably not any more. Personally, I had no problem with it though.
Pretty different context though. Rafiki and Simba knew each other well, had a relationship of trust, Simba always had the power to leave the situation (he was no chained up), and Rafiki was genuinely trying to help Simba at the time. That's pretty different from conking someone you've already drugged and kidnapped for you own amusement.
To be clear, I don't think the bang was a big deal on its own - if it was only slightly evil, and certainly not a strong indication of overall alignment. But it is part of a pattern of pretty poor treatment for prisoners who she probably had no right to kidnap at all, but even if she did have a right she should be pretty apologetic about it.
I agree it does seem to be a pattern.
In terms of the why, it seems people have a lot of trouble accepting that a woman can be evil. If a man in the same situation seemed evil nobody would deny it. That's my guess anyway.
Edit:
Rereading your post, I should clarify that I don't necessarily think all those people are evil:
- Hilgya seemed to have been, being an active member of the linear guild and killing Durkon. A good example of the phenomena I mention above where people seem to fall over themselves to make excuses for them (the femal frost giant being similar0
- Miko is complex, so different people may have different perspecitves.
- Oona we don't have much info on, but reasonable to presume she is evil (until proven otherwise) because she's helping the group literally called team evil.
- Not sure why anyone would say Bandana was evil.
Like Belkar.....Last edited by Pirate ninja; 2021-02-26 at 09:10 PM.
-
2021-02-26, 08:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
But Eugene is not a real person and those scenes are not chosen at random. He's a fictional character, created by an author, who deliberately chose to portray him acting a certain way, consistently, 100% of the time, in life, in death, to his wife, to his son, before he carelessly killed his other son, after he did so, etc. etc. (Indeed, if you really want to get meta-textual with it, you could make the case that, being a fictional character, he doesn't exist outside of those strips.) I don't think the argument that "Eugene behaves an entirely different way most of his life, and the author just chose scenes to portray him with a different set of values, attitudes, and actions as misdirection" holds much water.
-
2021-02-26, 09:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Conversely, "the character is a pizza and you've only seen a slice" is pretty much exactly what The Giant himself has said before:That being said, he's notably never spoken on Eugene's alignment, but "the slice vs the pizza" is a fair argument.
-
2021-02-26, 09:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
A single bonk, two lies (the other being about poison), one drugging, one kidnapping, a period of imprisonment, mockery, some teasing with promises of freedom (which overlaps with one of the lies to be fair), and a promise of a second drugging to come. Not bad for someone whose appeared in three or four strips - probably a higher rate of mischief to airtime than Belkar.
Last edited by Pirate ninja; 2021-02-26 at 09:10 PM.
-
2021-02-26, 09:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
Well, this brings up the question of alignment as descriptive vs. prescriptive. The Giant also says that when he refers to a character's alignment, he's referring to the perspective they view the world from and act from-- prescriptive-- and in that sense, we might see a slice of their decisions that looks more like another alignment than that their alignment. But that's different than looking at the sum total of someone's actions in their life and coming to a conclusion-- descriptive-- about how they lived their lives, regardless of how they thought they lived them.
Also, I can't really think of any examples besides Eugene where a character's supposed alignment didn't match with their actions. People argued if Therkla was True Neutral since she was working for a clearly Lawful Evil guy, or if Shojo was Chaotic Good given all the methods he used in ruling Azure City and the Sapphire Guard, but their actions don't contradict their stated alignments, either, and are quite explainable as fitting in their alignments. I'm just wondering what the actions are that make Eugene either Lawful or Good, because all I've ever seen is a selfish and self-interested guy who regularly abandons his responsibilities.
(If we're talking Giant quotes, we also have to mention that he pointedly avoided confirming Eugene's alignment and was rather coy about whether Eugene would actually be judged as Lawful Good in the end.)
-
2021-02-26, 09:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2020
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
New topic: Some people here have theorized that Serini captured the paladins because, like Girard, she distrusted Soon and thought he sent them there to interfere with her gate. They have further theorized that O-chul may be able to convince her that they're on her side once he explains all the facts about Xykon, the fall of Azure City, the gods' panic, and so forth.
Here is my alternate theory: Serini knows everything that we, the readers, know AND THEN SOME. After all, she would have known when Azure City fell, and (as has already been discussed) she apparently has a dragon or some other high-level mage-type on her payroll who can scry. If not, she could have gotten in touch with Girard's clan and asked them to scry for her.
Furthermore, since she's a high-level Rogue, she isn't just going to notice two paladins camping out on a ledge, eavesdrop invisibly for a few minutes until she overhears them talking about locating the gate, and then take them out. I'll bet she observed everything going on in the valley for days or weeks before making her move.
She probably knows about the gods' plan to destroy the world due to the "existing" comment. I think she considers Roy to be the paladins' "boss," not Hinjo or Soon. She may even know about the Order disabling her teleport trap.
I can't imagine what her reasons for taking out the paladins actually are. I just don't think that talking her out of it will be as simple as "give her some more facts." I think she's got most of the facts, and her plan makes sense to her because of them.
Furthermore, I think we will find this out in the next comic.
-
2021-02-26, 09:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
I think you are on the right track.
Clearly Serini could have ignored the pair of paladins. The worse thing that could happen is they are spotted and murdered.
What did she gain by nabbing them? This is likely to be something in the spirit of "they were in real danger of getting spotted, so I just saved their lives" or "Greenhilt will need your help, so I am dropping you two where and when he needs you".
Serini may not be nice, but her actions and even her story about the trolls hint that she has Good-ish intentions as a significant motivator.
I think it is worth revisiting her conversation in this comic. What is Serini doing but mocking Hinjo for being a LG who is somewhat myopic about how morality plays out in the real world? That is perfectly consistent with someone Wise But Good.I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2021-02-26, 10:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
And, importantly, it appears that she remains committed to defending the gate, even if 'the original plan' (as she mentions in panel 2) was for the gates to be well enough defended without her. Her casual "I belong up here with the monsters now" seems to me to have a slight double meaning.
Her monsters defend the gate.
She is up here, where she belongs, defending the gate.
But it might just be her self deprecating sense of humor regarding her looks now that she's got the troll augment going on.
Mind you, if she breaks out into a chorus of "It's not easy being green" I'll probably gag.Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2021-02-26, 10:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #1227 - The Discussion Thread
So what would happen if someone who wasn't maimed and close to death got an infusion of fresh troll blood?