Results 61 to 90 of 279
-
2013-07-24, 01:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
-
2013-07-24, 01:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
-
2013-07-24, 01:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by Inuzuka; 2013-07-24 at 01:29 PM.
-
2013-07-24, 01:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
ok, now what? Haley is in immediate danger, I still wonder how Belkar got into the mess, Roy ruins the day via reasoning...
An amazing strip.
-
2013-07-24, 01:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
And a mop instead of hair.
http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0235.html
-
2013-07-24, 01:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
The problem with your code here is the "isDead" attribute. Redcloak said "kill everyone, starting with the human with the greatsword." If they drop the sword, there will indeed be no more "human with the greatsword" but that won't actually stop the second half of his orders.
In other words, you are incorrectly assuming "death" is the only way there will no longer be a human with a greatsword.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2013-07-24, 01:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- The US of A
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
No, you can't.
My only regret is that if some one reads through the strips years from now, or in book form, they won't get the full weight of the joke.
But then again, it's probably at least a little presumptuous of me to assume the Giant is only speaking to us. The line certainly isn't out of place all on it's own.Last edited by Deepbluediver; 2013-07-24 at 01:37 PM.
-
2013-07-24, 01:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Maybe. The question is, assuming it no longer sees a "human with the greatsword" to attack, does it stop attacking (being unable to complete its first command) or does it assume the human with greatsword target has been eliminated and move on to the rest of everyone.
--- Ninjas! ---Last edited by FolcoTook; 2013-07-24 at 01:36 PM.
-
2013-07-24, 01:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Because (and I'm switching to BASIC here because, hey, it's a fantasy game) that's not the nuance of Redcloak's command. It was "Kill everyone, starting with the human with the greatsword."
So it's more like:
10 SET LIVINGPEOPLE = 4
20 FOR I = 1 to Livingpeople
30 IF WEAPON(I) != GREATSWORD THEN IGNORE
40 IF RACE(I) != HUMAN THEN IGNORE
50 ELSE SET TARGET=CHAR(I)
60 NEXT I
70 IF TARGET != 0 KILL TARGET
80 ELSE IF LIVINGPEOPLE > 0 KILL RANDOM PERSON
90 GOTO 20
God, we need lives.
-
2013-07-24, 01:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- TGaPT
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Come one, come all! GitP MLP Steam Group is open!
Current location of the last MLP Thread OP, too.
Want to ask me something? Use MAIL or message me on Steam!
"Well, the Great and Powerful Trixie can't actually transport you to Equestria... But!
The Great and Powerful Trixie can beat you over the head until you think that's what happened!"
-
2013-07-24, 01:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- The US of A
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
I don't know a lot about programming, but are you sure the spell specifies only 4 people? RC just said "kill everyone". In the absence of a limited duration or defeat, maybe the elemental would kill the OotS, then Tarquin & Co, then move on to the nearest city or town, work its way across the continent, then cross the ocean to get to the NEXT continent, etc etc etc.
Last edited by Deepbluediver; 2013-07-24 at 01:43 PM.
-
2013-07-24, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
-
2013-07-24, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Nice to see that we can still cut away from deadly combat and have a bit of silly fun at our own expense :)
-
2013-07-24, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
-
2013-07-24, 01:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Yeah, I've been on that date.
Of course. Did you read the title of the strip?
The INT score and stupidity have nothing to do with it. Redcloak could have meant either one. For instance, if the greatsword was +5 vs. Goblins, then clearly whichever person has it is the biggest threat against the one who summed the elemental. You and I know that's not the case, but the elemental doesn't.
The order was ambiguous. Note that Haley didn't say, "I'm the one you're supposed to kill first"; she said, "Are you sure I'm not the one you're supposed to kill first?"
She's trying to confuse it based on ambiguity.
-
2013-07-24, 01:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- England
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
You'd think that 6 int would be enough for an Elder Elemental to parse that command in the way it was intended, not be driven to switch targets whenever a new human picks up a greatsword. Though I do like that kind of cleverness, and this strip was funny. Elan has been a lot less annoying and a lot more amusing, recently :)
Also, to all the people that slight the order for not overcoming this thing's damage reduction in a more organized way, remember that both the PC's that are likely to have ranks in Knowledge: The Planes are indisposed right now.
-
2013-07-24, 01:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
All attempts to determine which precise computer code is equivalent to the order are equally incorrect.
It wasn't given in precise computer code; it was given in imprecise English. The order as given was ambiguous, and Haley is trying to exploit that ambiguity.
-
2013-07-24, 01:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
-
2013-07-24, 01:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Prediction for the next comic (Since I haven't made one before, I think, plus it doesn't seem anyone else has in this thread)
SpoilerNext comic, title "Die by the technicality", possibly. V realizes he/she will be killed by the rubble on top of his/her body when he/she is returned to it, and/or Belkar takes Roy's sword, only to be killed by the elemental who no longer has a human with a greatsword to kill (We are meant to spoiler predictions, right?)
-
2013-07-24, 01:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- The US of A
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Question: if the title of this thread is the first half of a phrase, and the second half is of course "Die by the Technicality", who do we think is going to bite it?
SpoilerBelkar is the obvious choice, but you know who's name hasn't been thrown around a lot? Haley. Which is what would make it such a shocker.
She's got a small-ish HD and probably not a ton of Con, so a few good hits or being buried in sand for to long and she's likely to be explaining herself to a Deva.
It would be the perfect way to cap off the depressing-as-heck set of events we've seen so far this arc.
-
2013-07-24, 01:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- TGaPT
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Come one, come all! GitP MLP Steam Group is open!
Current location of the last MLP Thread OP, too.
Want to ask me something? Use MAIL or message me on Steam!
"Well, the Great and Powerful Trixie can't actually transport you to Equestria... But!
The Great and Powerful Trixie can beat you over the head until you think that's what happened!"
-
2013-07-24, 01:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Huh? Roy is using a bow?!? Whaaat??? Although the whole "Haley grabbing the sword" thing was pretty clever. anyway: YAY AWESOME!!!
-
2013-07-24, 01:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
-
2013-07-24, 01:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
HUMANS....... ARE....... SUPERIORRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But she was naked! And all... articulate!!
-
2013-07-24, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Well, Tarquin lives by technicalities (in his words)...
-
2013-07-24, 02:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by Kish; 2013-07-24 at 02:21 PM.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2013-07-24, 02:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
-
2013-07-24, 02:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
If you like my thoughts, you'll love my writing. Visit me at www.mishahandman.com.
-
2013-07-24, 02:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- Somewhere on Earth
-
2013-07-24, 02:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Czech Republic
- Gender
Re: OOTS #904 - The Discussion Thread
Nice Just a few more rounds of sword-play and the sand dude is gone.
Edit: Also, the third-to-last panel is priceless.Last edited by Mike Havran; 2013-07-24 at 02:19 PM.
There must be some sense of order - personal, political or dramatic - and if no one else is going to bring it to this world, I will.
Silent member of Zz'dtri's #698 Scrying Sensor Explanation Club.